Checkpoint inhibition for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2024.2370395
Ilana Schlam, Chiara Corti, Sarah Sammons, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Sara M Tolaney
{"title":"Checkpoint inhibition for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.","authors":"Ilana Schlam, Chiara Corti, Sarah Sammons, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Sara M Tolaney","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2370395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most patients with breast cancer have early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease. Even though the prognosis for most of these patients is good, there is a need to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes and to develop strategies to mitigate this risk.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The addition of immunotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy represents a promising option for select patients with HR-positive early breast cancer. Three randomized clinical trials have shown favorable results to date. In this review, we discuss the findings of I-SPY2, CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066), and KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite the promising results of these trials, there are unanswered questions that need to be considered before incorporating neo/adjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm of early-stage HR-positive breast cancer. One example of an unanswered question is patient selection. Because the regimens used in these protocols are associated with long-term toxicities, identifying the patients who are more likely to derive a benefit from these agents, such as through the use of biomarkers, is critical. A second example is the optimal integration of adjuvant therapies that improve invasive disease-free survival, such as abemaciclib and ribociclib, which are not safely administered concurrently with immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2370395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most patients with breast cancer have early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease. Even though the prognosis for most of these patients is good, there is a need to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes and to develop strategies to mitigate this risk.

Areas covered: The addition of immunotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy represents a promising option for select patients with HR-positive early breast cancer. Three randomized clinical trials have shown favorable results to date. In this review, we discuss the findings of I-SPY2, CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066), and KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059).

Expert opinion: Despite the promising results of these trials, there are unanswered questions that need to be considered before incorporating neo/adjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm of early-stage HR-positive breast cancer. One example of an unanswered question is patient selection. Because the regimens used in these protocols are associated with long-term toxicities, identifying the patients who are more likely to derive a benefit from these agents, such as through the use of biomarkers, is critical. A second example is the optimal integration of adjuvant therapies that improve invasive disease-free survival, such as abemaciclib and ribociclib, which are not safely administered concurrently with immunotherapy.

检查点抑制治疗早期激素受体阳性乳腺癌。
简介大多数乳腺癌患者为早期激素受体(HR)阳性、人类表皮生长因子受体-2(HER2)阴性。尽管这些患者中的大多数预后良好,但仍有必要识别有不良预后风险的患者,并制定减轻这种风险的策略:在标准新辅助化疗的基础上增加免疫疗法,对于HR阳性早期乳腺癌患者来说是一种很有前景的选择。迄今为止,已有三项随机临床试验显示了良好的效果。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了I-SPY2、CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066)和KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059)的研究结果:尽管这些试验结果令人鼓舞,但在将新/辅助免疫疗法纳入早期HR阳性乳腺癌的治疗模式之前,仍有一些未解之谜需要考虑。其中一个未解之谜就是患者的选择。由于这些方案中使用的治疗方案与长期毒性有关,因此通过使用生物标志物等方法确定更有可能从这些药物中获益的患者至关重要。第二个例子是如何优化整合可提高无侵袭性疾病生存率的辅助疗法,如 abemaciclib 和 ribociclib,这些疗法与免疫疗法同时使用并不安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信