Influence of the glutamate-glutamine cycle on valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2366920
Linfeng Ma, Jingwei Zhu, Xiaoni Kong, Li Chen, Jiangdong Du, Liping Yang, Dan Wang, Zhe Wang
{"title":"Influence of the glutamate-glutamine cycle on valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity in pediatric patients with epilepsy.","authors":"Linfeng Ma, Jingwei Zhu, Xiaoni Kong, Li Chen, Jiangdong Du, Liping Yang, Dan Wang, Zhe Wang","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2366920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although valproic acid is generally well tolerated, hepatotoxicity is a common side effect in patients receiving long-term treatment. However, the mechanisms underlying valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To investigate the mechanisms and explore the potential risk factors for valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity, 165 age-matched pediatric patients were recruited for laboratory tests and glutamate-glutamine cycle analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concentration of glutamate in patients with hepatotoxicity was significantly greater than that in control patients, while the concentration of glutamine in patients with hepatotoxicity was significantly lower than that in control patients (<i>P</i> <0.05). In addition, the frequencies of the heterozygous with one mutant allele and homozygous with two mutant alleles genotypes in <i>glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021</i> were significantly higher in the hepatotoxicity group than those in the control group (47.1 percent versus 32.5 percent, <i>P</i> = 0.010; 17.6 percent versus 5.2 percent, <i>P</i> = 0.001, respectively). Moreover, heterozygous carriers with one mutant allele and homozygous carriers with two mutant alleles genotypes of <i>glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021</i> exhibited significant differences in the concentrations of glutamine and glutamate concentrations (<i>P</i> ˂ 0.001 and <i>P</i> = 0.001, respectively) and liver function indicators (activities of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase, <i>P</i> <0.001, respectively). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis indicated that <i>glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021</i> (<i>P</i> = 0.002, odds ratio: 3.027, 95 percent confidence interval, 1.521 - 6.023) and glutamate (<i>P</i> = 0.001, odds ratio: 2.235, 95 percent confidence interval, 1.369 - 3.146) were associated with a greater risk for hepatotoxicity, while glutamine concentrations were negatively associated with hepatotoxicity (<i>P</i> = 0.001, odds ratio: 0.711, 95 percent confidence interval, 0.629 - 0.804).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Understanding pharmacogenomic risks for valproic acid induced hepatotoxicity might help direct patient specific care. Limitations of our study include the exclusive use of children from one location and concomitant medication use in many patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perturbation of the glutamate-glutamine cycle is associated with valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity. Moreover, <i>glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021</i>, glutamate and glutamine concentrations are potential risk factors for valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"364-371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2366920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although valproic acid is generally well tolerated, hepatotoxicity is a common side effect in patients receiving long-term treatment. However, the mechanisms underlying valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity remain elusive.

Methods: To investigate the mechanisms and explore the potential risk factors for valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity, 165 age-matched pediatric patients were recruited for laboratory tests and glutamate-glutamine cycle analysis.

Results: The concentration of glutamate in patients with hepatotoxicity was significantly greater than that in control patients, while the concentration of glutamine in patients with hepatotoxicity was significantly lower than that in control patients (P <0.05). In addition, the frequencies of the heterozygous with one mutant allele and homozygous with two mutant alleles genotypes in glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021 were significantly higher in the hepatotoxicity group than those in the control group (47.1 percent versus 32.5 percent, P = 0.010; 17.6 percent versus 5.2 percent, P = 0.001, respectively). Moreover, heterozygous carriers with one mutant allele and homozygous carriers with two mutant alleles genotypes of glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021 exhibited significant differences in the concentrations of glutamine and glutamate concentrations (P ˂ 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) and liver function indicators (activities of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase, P <0.001, respectively). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis indicated that glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021 (P = 0.002, odds ratio: 3.027, 95 percent confidence interval, 1.521 - 6.023) and glutamate (P = 0.001, odds ratio: 2.235, 95 percent confidence interval, 1.369 - 3.146) were associated with a greater risk for hepatotoxicity, while glutamine concentrations were negatively associated with hepatotoxicity (P = 0.001, odds ratio: 0.711, 95 percent confidence interval, 0.629 - 0.804).

Discussion: Understanding pharmacogenomic risks for valproic acid induced hepatotoxicity might help direct patient specific care. Limitations of our study include the exclusive use of children from one location and concomitant medication use in many patients.

Conclusion: Perturbation of the glutamate-glutamine cycle is associated with valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity. Moreover, glutamate-ammonia ligase rs10911021, glutamate and glutamine concentrations are potential risk factors for valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity.

谷氨酸-谷氨酰胺循环对小儿癫痫患者丙戊酸相关肝毒性的影响。
介绍:虽然丙戊酸一般耐受性良好,但肝毒性是长期接受治疗的患者常见的副作用。然而,丙戊酸相关肝毒性的发生机制仍然难以捉摸:为了研究丙戊酸相关肝毒性的机制并探索其潜在风险因素,我们招募了165名年龄匹配的儿科患者进行实验室检测和谷氨酸-谷氨酰胺循环分析:结果:肝毒性患者谷氨酸的浓度明显高于对照组患者,而肝毒性患者谷氨酰胺的浓度明显低于对照组患者(P ˂0.05)。此外,谷氨酸-氨连接酶 rs10911021 的一个突变等位基因杂合携带者和两个突变等位基因同源携带者的频率在肝毒性组中明显高于对照组(分别为 47.1% 对 32.5%,P = 0.010;17.6% 对 5.2%,P = 0.001)。此外,谷氨酸-氨连接酶 rs10911021 的一个突变等位基因杂合子携带者和两个突变等位基因基因型的同源携带者在谷氨酰胺浓度和谷氨酸浓度方面表现出显著差异(P ˂ 0.001 和 P = 0.001)和肝功能指标(天冬氨酸氨基转移酶、丙氨酸氨基转移酶和γ-谷氨酰转移酶的活性,P ˂ 0.001)存在显著差异。此外,逻辑回归分析表明,谷氨酸-氨基转移酶 rs10911021(P = 0.002,几率比:3.027,95%置信区间,1.521 - 6.023)和谷氨酸(P = 0.001,几率比:2.235,95%置信区间,1.369 - 3.146)与肝毒性风险较大相关,而谷氨酰胺浓度与肝毒性呈负相关(P = 0.001,几率比:0.711,95% 置信区间:0.629 - 0.804):讨论:了解丙戊酸诱发肝毒性的药物基因组风险有助于指导针对患者的治疗。我们研究的局限性包括:仅使用来自一个地方的儿童,以及许多患者同时使用药物:结论:谷氨酸-谷氨酰胺循环紊乱与丙戊酸相关性肝中毒有关。此外,谷氨酸-氨连接酶 rs10911021、谷氨酸和谷氨酰胺浓度也是丙戊酸相关肝毒性的潜在风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信