The impact of work-related wellbeing and workplace culture and climate on intention to leave in the early childhood sector

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rebecca Bull , Laura McFarland , Tamara Cumming , Sandie Wong
{"title":"The impact of work-related wellbeing and workplace culture and climate on intention to leave in the early childhood sector","authors":"Rebecca Bull ,&nbsp;Laura McFarland ,&nbsp;Tamara Cumming ,&nbsp;Sandie Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) enables families to participate in paid employment and promotes positive outcomes for children. Maintaining a stable ECEC workforce is critical to these endeavours. However, the retention of qualified early childhood educators is a pervasive problem globally. While much has been written about reasons for leaving the sector, there has been less attention to the ‘intention to leave’ stage. This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore how work culture and climate and work-related wellbeing support early childhood professionals’ decisions to stay in or leave the profession, and whether there are significant differences between educators’ and centre directors’ intention to leave. Quantitative findings of survey responses from 713 early childhood professionals suggest that one in three respondents intended to leave the profession, more than half of these within five years. Emotional exhaustion predicted intention to leave in both groups. For centre directors, higher personal accomplishment and older age also predicted higher likelihood of intending to leave. For educators, lower satisfaction with pay and benefits and lower qualification level predicted intention to leave. Qualitative findings highlighted participants’ (n = 97) reasons for intention to leave the sector: feeling undervalued, increased demands with inadequate support, and workforce issues. Understanding these factors may assist in designing interventions to prevent intention turning into a decision to leave, and therefore improve workforce stability. This is especially timely in the Australian context, when attention to supporting the ECEC workforce is high on the political agenda, and real structural and organisational change is possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000942/pdfft?md5=e61e9d1ef4b842df4680b0e436e267c9&pid=1-s2.0-S0885200624000942-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) enables families to participate in paid employment and promotes positive outcomes for children. Maintaining a stable ECEC workforce is critical to these endeavours. However, the retention of qualified early childhood educators is a pervasive problem globally. While much has been written about reasons for leaving the sector, there has been less attention to the ‘intention to leave’ stage. This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore how work culture and climate and work-related wellbeing support early childhood professionals’ decisions to stay in or leave the profession, and whether there are significant differences between educators’ and centre directors’ intention to leave. Quantitative findings of survey responses from 713 early childhood professionals suggest that one in three respondents intended to leave the profession, more than half of these within five years. Emotional exhaustion predicted intention to leave in both groups. For centre directors, higher personal accomplishment and older age also predicted higher likelihood of intending to leave. For educators, lower satisfaction with pay and benefits and lower qualification level predicted intention to leave. Qualitative findings highlighted participants’ (n = 97) reasons for intention to leave the sector: feeling undervalued, increased demands with inadequate support, and workforce issues. Understanding these factors may assist in designing interventions to prevent intention turning into a decision to leave, and therefore improve workforce stability. This is especially timely in the Australian context, when attention to supporting the ECEC workforce is high on the political agenda, and real structural and organisational change is possible.

与工作相关的福利以及工作场所文化和氛围对幼儿教育行业离职意向的影响
高质量的幼儿教育和保育(ECEC)使家庭能够参与有偿就业,并为儿童带来积极的成果。保持一支稳定的幼儿教育和保育队伍对这些努力至关重要。然而,留住合格的幼儿教育工作者是全球普遍存在的问题。虽然关于离开该行业的原因已有很多论述,但对 "离职意向 "阶段的关注却较少。本研究采用混合方法,探讨工作文化和氛围以及与工作相关的幸福感如何支持幼儿教育专业人员决定留在或离开这一行业,以及教育工作者和中心主任的离职意向之间是否存在显著差异。对 713 名幼儿教育专业人员的调查结果显示,每三名受访者中就有一人打算离开幼儿教育行业,其中一半以上的人将在五年内离开。两组受访者的离职意向都与情感疲惫有关。对于中心主任来说,个人成就感较高和年龄较大也预示着较高的离职意愿。对于教育工作者来说,对薪酬和福利的满意度较低以及资格水平较低也预示着离职意向。定性研究结果强调了参与者(n = 97)有意离开该行业的原因:感觉价值被低估、需求增加但支持不足以及劳动力问题。了解这些因素有助于设计干预措施,防止离职意向转化为离职决定,从而提高劳动力的稳定性。这在澳大利亚尤为及时,因为支持幼儿保育和教育工作队伍已成为政治议程上的优先事项,真正的结构和组织变革也已成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信