Factors Associated With Loss to Follow Up After Temporal Bone Fracture.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Aneesh A Patel, Peter C Weber
{"title":"Factors Associated With Loss to Follow Up After Temporal Bone Fracture.","authors":"Aneesh A Patel, Peter C Weber","doi":"10.1177/00034894241262589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inpatient and outpatient evaluation is important for management of temporal bone trauma due to the possible otologic complications that can result. However, there is limited literature on follow up rates following temporal bone fracture. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients lost to follow up after sustaining temporal bone fractures and identify factors associated with loss to follow up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of adult patients who sustained temporal bone fractures at a level I trauma center from January 1, 2019 to January 1, 2024 was completed (IRB H-44161). The primary outcome included prevalence of patient loss to follow up. Secondary variables included initial radiographic and exam findings, otologic complications, and demographic characteristics. Patients who were seen in follow up and lost to follow up were compared, and odds of loss to follow up was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria for this study, of which 30 patients (43.5%) were lost to follow up. Patients who were White had a significantly lower odds of loss to follow up than those who were not White (OR = 0.2506 (95% CI: 0.0706, 0.8067, <i>P</i> = .0024). While need for acute management was not significantly different between the groups, a significantly lower proportion of patients who were intubated on presentation (<i>P</i> = .0091), had abnormal otoscopic exam (<i>P</i> = .0211), and had otologic complications (<i>P</i> = .0056) were lost to follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost half of patients who sustained temporal bone fractures, including a significantly higher odds of minority race/ethnicity patients, were lost to follow up.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241262589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inpatient and outpatient evaluation is important for management of temporal bone trauma due to the possible otologic complications that can result. However, there is limited literature on follow up rates following temporal bone fracture. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients lost to follow up after sustaining temporal bone fractures and identify factors associated with loss to follow up.

Methods: Retrospective review of adult patients who sustained temporal bone fractures at a level I trauma center from January 1, 2019 to January 1, 2024 was completed (IRB H-44161). The primary outcome included prevalence of patient loss to follow up. Secondary variables included initial radiographic and exam findings, otologic complications, and demographic characteristics. Patients who were seen in follow up and lost to follow up were compared, and odds of loss to follow up was calculated.

Results: Sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria for this study, of which 30 patients (43.5%) were lost to follow up. Patients who were White had a significantly lower odds of loss to follow up than those who were not White (OR = 0.2506 (95% CI: 0.0706, 0.8067, P = .0024). While need for acute management was not significantly different between the groups, a significantly lower proportion of patients who were intubated on presentation (P = .0091), had abnormal otoscopic exam (P = .0211), and had otologic complications (P = .0056) were lost to follow up.

Conclusion: Almost half of patients who sustained temporal bone fractures, including a significantly higher odds of minority race/ethnicity patients, were lost to follow up.

颞骨骨折后失去随访的相关因素
简介由于颞骨骨折可能导致耳科并发症,因此住院和门诊评估对于颞骨创伤的治疗非常重要。然而,有关颞骨骨折后随访率的文献却很有限。本研究旨在确定颞骨骨折后失去随访机会的患者比例,并找出与失去随访机会相关的因素:方法:对2019年1月1日至2024年1月1日期间在一级创伤中心接受治疗的颞骨骨折成年患者进行回顾性研究(IRB H-44161)。主要结果包括患者失去随访的发生率。次要变量包括初始放射学和检查结果、耳科并发症和人口统计学特征。对接受随访和失去随访的患者进行比较,并计算失去随访的几率:69名患者符合本研究的纳入标准,其中30名患者(43.5%)失去了随访机会。白人患者失去随访机会的几率明显低于非白人患者(OR = 0.2506 (95% CI: 0.0706, 0.8067, P = .0024))。虽然两组患者对急性治疗的需求无明显差异,但在随访中,发病时插管(P = .0091)、耳镜检查异常(P = .0211)和出现耳科并发症(P = .0056)的患者比例明显较低:结论:近一半的颞骨骨折患者失去了随访机会,其中少数民族/族裔患者失去随访机会的几率明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信