Towards Reliable Detection of Introgression in the Presence of Among-Species Rate Variation.

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Thore Koppetsch, Milan Malinsky, Michael Matschiner
{"title":"Towards Reliable Detection of Introgression in the Presence of Among-Species Rate Variation.","authors":"Thore Koppetsch, Milan Malinsky, Michael Matschiner","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of interspecific hybridization has recently seen increasing attention, especially in the context of diversification dynamics. Genomic research has now made it abundantly clear that both hybridization and introgression-the exchange of genetic material through hybridization and backcrossing-are far more common than previously thought. Besides cases of ongoing or recent genetic exchange between taxa, an increasing number of studies report \"ancient introgression\"- referring to results of hybridization that took place in the distant past. However, it is not clear whether commonly used methods for the detection of introgression are applicable to such old systems, given that most of these methods were originally developed for analyses at the level of populations and recently diverged species, affected by recent or ongoing genetic exchange. In particular, the assumption of constant evolutionary rates, which is implicit in many commonly used approaches, is more likely to be violated as evolutionary divergence increases. To test the limitations of introgression detection methods when being applied to old systems, we simulated thousands of genomic datasets under a wide range of settings, with varying degrees of among-species rate variation and introgression. Using these simulated datasets, we showed that some commonly applied statistical methods, including the D-statistic and certain tests based on sets of local phylogenetic trees, can produce false-positive signals of introgression between divergent taxa that have different rates of evolution. These misleading signals are caused by the presence of homoplasies occurring at different rates in different lineages. To distinguish between the patterns caused by rate variation and genuine introgression, we developed a new test that is based on the expected clustering of introgressed sites along the genome and implemented this test in the program Dsuite.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of interspecific hybridization has recently seen increasing attention, especially in the context of diversification dynamics. Genomic research has now made it abundantly clear that both hybridization and introgression-the exchange of genetic material through hybridization and backcrossing-are far more common than previously thought. Besides cases of ongoing or recent genetic exchange between taxa, an increasing number of studies report "ancient introgression"- referring to results of hybridization that took place in the distant past. However, it is not clear whether commonly used methods for the detection of introgression are applicable to such old systems, given that most of these methods were originally developed for analyses at the level of populations and recently diverged species, affected by recent or ongoing genetic exchange. In particular, the assumption of constant evolutionary rates, which is implicit in many commonly used approaches, is more likely to be violated as evolutionary divergence increases. To test the limitations of introgression detection methods when being applied to old systems, we simulated thousands of genomic datasets under a wide range of settings, with varying degrees of among-species rate variation and introgression. Using these simulated datasets, we showed that some commonly applied statistical methods, including the D-statistic and certain tests based on sets of local phylogenetic trees, can produce false-positive signals of introgression between divergent taxa that have different rates of evolution. These misleading signals are caused by the presence of homoplasies occurring at different rates in different lineages. To distinguish between the patterns caused by rate variation and genuine introgression, we developed a new test that is based on the expected clustering of introgressed sites along the genome and implemented this test in the program Dsuite.

在存在物种间速率变异的情况下,实现可靠的引种检测。
近来,种间杂交的作用越来越受到关注,尤其是在物种多样化动态的背景下。基因组研究现在已经非常清楚地表明,杂交和引种--通过杂交和回交进行遗传物质交换--比以前想象的要普遍得多。除了类群之间正在进行的或最近发生的基因交流,越来越多的研究报告了 "古老的引入"--指的是远古时代发生的杂交结果。然而,目前还不清楚常用的检测引入的方法是否适用于这种古老的系统,因为这些方法最初大多是为分析受近期或正在进行的遗传交流影响的种群和新近分化的物种而开发的。特别是,许多常用方法中隐含的恒定进化速率假设,随着进化差异的增加更有可能被违反。为了检验引入检测方法在应用于旧系统时的局限性,我们模拟了数千个基因组数据集,这些数据集在各种设置下,物种间的进化率变化和引入程度各不相同。通过使用这些模拟数据集,我们发现一些常用的统计方法,包括 D 统计量和某些基于局部系统发生树的测试,会在具有不同进化速率的不同类群之间产生引入的假阳性信号。这些误导性信号是由于同源现象在不同品系中以不同的速度出现而造成的。为了区分由进化速率变化引起的模式和真正的引入,我们开发了一种新的检验方法,它基于引入位点沿基因组的预期聚类,并在 Dsuite 程序中实现了这一检验方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信