Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes Were Not Negatively Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Q3 Medicine
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2024-06-22 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1785661
Andrew J Stevens, Akshar V Patel, David Gibbs, Gregory Cvetanovich, Julie Y Bishop, Ryan C Rauck
{"title":"Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes Were Not Negatively Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Andrew J Stevens, Akshar V Patel, David Gibbs, Gregory Cvetanovich, Julie Y Bishop, Ryan C Rauck","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1785661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To investigate whether patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) between January and March 2020 experienced different postoperative outcomes than patients in 2019. We hypothesized that patients in 2020 would have less access to physical therapy (PT) and experience different postoperative outcomes. <b>Methods</b>  Records from patients who received ATSA between January 1st, 2019, and March 17th, 2019, and January 1st, 2020, to March 17th, 2020, were analyzed. Patient data, including demographic information, range of motion (ROM), strength, and PT was collected and compared between the two groups. The 2020 patients were contacted by phone during October 2022 and patient-reported metrics were gathered. <b>Results</b>  The present study identified 24 patients in 2019 and 27 patients in 2020 who underwent ATSA during the specified time frame and had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients in 2019 experienced improvements in forward elevation (FE) ROM (125.4° to 146.7°; <i>p</i>  = 0.008), external rotation (ER; 33.0° to 47.7°; <i>p</i>  < 0.001), and internal rotation (IR; S1 to L4; <i>p</i>  = 0.019). Patients in 2020 also experienced significant improvements in FE (120.2° to 141.1°; <i>p</i>  = 0.009), ER (32.9° to 42.0°; <i>p</i>  = 0.037), and IR (S1 to L3; <i>p</i>  = 0.002). Patients in 2020 terminated PT earlier (2019: 125.8 days; 2020: 91.1 days; <i>p</i>  = 0.046) and completed fewer sessions (2019: 21.4 sessions; 2020: 13.1 sessions; <i>p</i>  = 0.003). At the final follow-up, patients in 2020 reported an average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score of 1.67 ± 1.1. <b>Conclusion</b>  Despite decreased PT, patients who underwent ATSA in 2020 had significant improvements in ROM and strength and were comparable to patients in 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"59 3","pages":"e429-e434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  To investigate whether patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) between January and March 2020 experienced different postoperative outcomes than patients in 2019. We hypothesized that patients in 2020 would have less access to physical therapy (PT) and experience different postoperative outcomes. Methods  Records from patients who received ATSA between January 1st, 2019, and March 17th, 2019, and January 1st, 2020, to March 17th, 2020, were analyzed. Patient data, including demographic information, range of motion (ROM), strength, and PT was collected and compared between the two groups. The 2020 patients were contacted by phone during October 2022 and patient-reported metrics were gathered. Results  The present study identified 24 patients in 2019 and 27 patients in 2020 who underwent ATSA during the specified time frame and had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients in 2019 experienced improvements in forward elevation (FE) ROM (125.4° to 146.7°; p  = 0.008), external rotation (ER; 33.0° to 47.7°; p  < 0.001), and internal rotation (IR; S1 to L4; p  = 0.019). Patients in 2020 also experienced significant improvements in FE (120.2° to 141.1°; p  = 0.009), ER (32.9° to 42.0°; p  = 0.037), and IR (S1 to L3; p  = 0.002). Patients in 2020 terminated PT earlier (2019: 125.8 days; 2020: 91.1 days; p  = 0.046) and completed fewer sessions (2019: 21.4 sessions; 2020: 13.1 sessions; p  = 0.003). At the final follow-up, patients in 2020 reported an average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score of 1.67 ± 1.1. Conclusion  Despite decreased PT, patients who underwent ATSA in 2020 had significant improvements in ROM and strength and were comparable to patients in 2019.

解剖全肩关节置换术结果未受 COVID-19 大流行的负面影响。
目的 研究2020年1月至3月期间接受解剖型全肩关节置换术(ATSA)的患者与2019年的患者相比,术后效果是否有所不同。我们假设,2020 年的患者接受物理治疗(PT)的机会较少,术后效果也会不同。方法 分析了在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 17 日和 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 17 日期间接受 ATSA 的患者记录。收集并比较了两组患者的数据,包括人口统计学信息、活动范围(ROM)、力量和运动能力。2022 年 10 月,通过电话联系了 2020 年的患者,并收集了患者报告的指标。结果 本研究发现,2019 年和 2020 年分别有 24 名和 27 名患者在规定时间内接受了 ATSA 治疗,并进行了至少 1 年的随访。2019年的患者在前倾(FE)ROM(125.4°至146.7°;P = 0.008)、外旋(ER;33.0°至47.7°;P = 0.019)方面有所改善。2020 年的患者在 FE(120.2° 至 141.1°;p = 0.009)、ER(32.9° 至 42.0°;p = 0.037)和 IR(S1 至 L3;p = 0.002)方面也有明显改善。2020 年的患者终止 PT 的时间更早(2019 年:125.8 天;2020 年:91.1 天;p = 0.046),完成的疗程更少(2019 年:21.4 个疗程;2020 年:13.1 个疗程;p = 0.003)。在最终随访中,2020 年患者的平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分为 1.67 ± 1.1。结论 尽管 PT 减少,但 2020 年接受 ATSA 的患者在 ROM 和力量方面有显著改善,与 2019 年的患者不相上下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信