Effectiveness of Mesotherapy in Post-COVID Pain Syndrome: Retrospective Cohort Study of 96 Patients

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Effectiveness of Mesotherapy in Post-COVID Pain Syndrome: Retrospective Cohort Study of 96 Patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Musculoskeletal pain may occur after becoming infected with SARS-Cov2. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of mesotherapy in treating chronic pain following COVID-19 infection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>A retrospective review was conducted of the records of 96 patients with post-COVID pain syndrome. Those who were eligible for oral therapy or mesotherapy, included in the study. Patients receiving oral treatment with </span>diclofenac potassium, </span>thiocolchicoside<span><span> and cyanocobalamin<span> were included in one group (n = 46), and patients receiving intradermal mesotherapy with 2% lidocaine + cyanocobalamin were included in another group (n = 50). The results of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic </span></span>Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) were individually assessed before and one week after the treatment.</span></p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The participants were 40.2 ± 11.1 years old on average. Of the participants, 35.4% (n = 34) were male and 64.6% (n = 62) were female. Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference between the patients in terms of VAS and LANSS scores. Following the treatment, a notable positive response was observed in both groups. Nevertheless, when compared to the oral treatment group, the mesotherapy group exhibited a more pronounced enhancement in VAS and LANSS scores (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>While both mesotherapy and oral therapy offer benefits in reducing pain and alleviating neuropathic symptoms in post-COVID pain syndrome, mesotherapy stands out as an especially effective and well-tolerated treatment method, surpassing the efficacy of the oral alternative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291824001115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Musculoskeletal pain may occur after becoming infected with SARS-Cov2. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of mesotherapy in treating chronic pain following COVID-19 infection.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of the records of 96 patients with post-COVID pain syndrome. Those who were eligible for oral therapy or mesotherapy, included in the study. Patients receiving oral treatment with diclofenac potassium, thiocolchicoside and cyanocobalamin were included in one group (n = 46), and patients receiving intradermal mesotherapy with 2% lidocaine + cyanocobalamin were included in another group (n = 50). The results of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) were individually assessed before and one week after the treatment.

Findings

The participants were 40.2 ± 11.1 years old on average. Of the participants, 35.4% (n = 34) were male and 64.6% (n = 62) were female. Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference between the patients in terms of VAS and LANSS scores. Following the treatment, a notable positive response was observed in both groups. Nevertheless, when compared to the oral treatment group, the mesotherapy group exhibited a more pronounced enhancement in VAS and LANSS scores (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively).

Implications

While both mesotherapy and oral therapy offer benefits in reducing pain and alleviating neuropathic symptoms in post-COVID pain syndrome, mesotherapy stands out as an especially effective and well-tolerated treatment method, surpassing the efficacy of the oral alternative.

中胚层疗法对后科维德疼痛综合征的疗效:96名患者的回顾性队列研究。
目的:感染 SARS-Cov2 后可能会出现肌肉骨骼疼痛。 本研究旨在评估美塑疗法治疗 COVID-19 感染后慢性疼痛的疗效:方法:我们对 96 名 COVID 后疼痛综合征患者的病历进行了回顾性审查。符合口服治疗或美塑疗法条件的患者均被纳入研究范围。接受双氯芬酸钾、硫代阿糖苷和氰钴胺口服治疗的患者为一组(n = 46),接受2%利多卡因+氰钴胺皮内中胚层疗法的患者为另一组(n = 50)。在治疗前和治疗一周后分别对视觉模拟量表(VAS)和利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估(LANSS)结果进行评估:参与者平均年龄(40.2±11.1)岁。其中男性占 35.4%(34 人),女性占 64.6%(62 人)。治疗前,患者的 VAS 和 LANSS 评分在统计学上没有显著差异。治疗后,两组患者都出现了明显的积极反应。不过,与口服治疗组相比,美塑疗法组的 VAS 和 LANSS 评分有更明显的提高(分别为 P < 0.001 和 P < 0.001):尽管美塑疗法和口服疗法都能减轻COVID后疼痛综合征的疼痛和神经病理性症状,但美塑疗法是一种特别有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法,其疗效超过了口服疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信