Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury in Rat Models: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Yueying Wang, Yi Ding, Chenchen Guo
{"title":"Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury in Rat Models: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yueying Wang, Yi Ding, Chenchen Guo","doi":"10.1177/09636897241262992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is one of the hopeful treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI). Most current studies are in animals, and less in humans, and the optimal transplantation strategy for MSCs is still controversial. In this article, we explore the optimal transplantation strategy of MSCs through a network meta-analysis of the effects of MSCs on SCI in animal models. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed) databases were searched by computer for randomized controlled studies on MSCs for SCI. Two investigators independently completed the literature screening and data extraction based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.4 software was used to assess the quality of the included literature. Stata 16.0 software was used for standard meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous variables to combine the statistics and calculate 95% confidence interval (95% CI). <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. Cochrane's <i>Q</i> test and the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> value were used to indicate the magnitude of heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used if <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> > 50% and <i>P</i> < 0.10 indicated significant heterogeneity between studies, and conversely, a fixed-effects model was used. Evidence network diagrams were drawn based on direct comparisons between various interventions. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) was used to predict the ranking of the treatment effects of each intervention. A total of 32 animal studies were included in this article for analysis. The results of the standard meta-analysis showed that MSCs improved motor ability after SCI. The network meta-analysis showed that the best treatment effect was achieved for adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ADMSCs) in terms of cell source and intrathecal (IT) in terms of transplantation modality. For transplantation timing, the best treatment effect was achieved when transplantation was performed in the subacute phase. The available literature suggests that IT transplantation using ADMSCs in the subacute phase may be the best transplantation strategy to improve functional impairment after SCI. Future high-quality studies are still needed to further validate the results of this study to ensure the reliability of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9721,"journal":{"name":"Cell Transplantation","volume":"33 ","pages":"9636897241262992"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897241262992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is one of the hopeful treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI). Most current studies are in animals, and less in humans, and the optimal transplantation strategy for MSCs is still controversial. In this article, we explore the optimal transplantation strategy of MSCs through a network meta-analysis of the effects of MSCs on SCI in animal models. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed) databases were searched by computer for randomized controlled studies on MSCs for SCI. Two investigators independently completed the literature screening and data extraction based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.4 software was used to assess the quality of the included literature. Stata 16.0 software was used for standard meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous variables to combine the statistics and calculate 95% confidence interval (95% CI). P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. Cochrane's Q test and the I2 value were used to indicate the magnitude of heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used if I2 > 50% and P < 0.10 indicated significant heterogeneity between studies, and conversely, a fixed-effects model was used. Evidence network diagrams were drawn based on direct comparisons between various interventions. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) was used to predict the ranking of the treatment effects of each intervention. A total of 32 animal studies were included in this article for analysis. The results of the standard meta-analysis showed that MSCs improved motor ability after SCI. The network meta-analysis showed that the best treatment effect was achieved for adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ADMSCs) in terms of cell source and intrathecal (IT) in terms of transplantation modality. For transplantation timing, the best treatment effect was achieved when transplantation was performed in the subacute phase. The available literature suggests that IT transplantation using ADMSCs in the subacute phase may be the best transplantation strategy to improve functional impairment after SCI. Future high-quality studies are still needed to further validate the results of this study to ensure the reliability of the results.

间充质干细胞治疗大鼠脊髓损伤模型:系统综述与网络元分析》。
间充质干细胞(MSCs)移植是治疗脊髓损伤(SCI)的希望疗法之一。目前的研究多为动物实验,人体实验较少,间充质干细胞的最佳移植策略仍存在争议。在本文中,我们通过对间叶干细胞在动物模型中对 SCI 的影响进行网络荟萃分析,探讨间叶干细胞的最佳移植策略。我们通过计算机检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)和中国生物医学文献服务系统(SinoMed)等数据库中有关间充质干细胞治疗SCI的随机对照研究。两名研究人员根据纳入和排除标准独立完成文献筛选和数据提取。使用RevMan 5.4软件评估纳入文献的质量。使用Stata 16.0软件进行标准荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。连续变量采用标准化平均差(SMD)进行统计合并,并计算 95% 置信区间(95% CI)。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。Cochrane's Q 检验和 I2 值用于显示异质性的程度。如果 I2 > 50%且 P < 0.10 表明研究之间存在显著异质性,则使用随机效应模型;反之,则使用固定效应模型。根据各种干预措施之间的直接比较绘制证据网络图。累积排序曲线下表面积(SUCRA)用于预测每种干预措施治疗效果的排序。本文共纳入 32 项动物研究进行分析。标准荟萃分析的结果表明,间充质干细胞能改善脊髓损伤后的运动能力。网络荟萃分析表明,就细胞来源而言,脂肪组织间充质干细胞(ADMSCs)的治疗效果最佳,就移植方式而言,鞘内间质干细胞(IT)的治疗效果最佳。在移植时间方面,亚急性期移植的治疗效果最佳。现有文献表明,在亚急性期使用 ADMSCs 进行鞘内移植可能是改善 SCI 后功能障碍的最佳移植策略。未来仍需开展高质量的研究来进一步验证本研究的结果,以确保结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell Transplantation
Cell Transplantation 生物-细胞与组织工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cell Transplantation, The Regenerative Medicine Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that is published 12 times annually. Cell Transplantation is a multi-disciplinary forum for publication of articles on cell transplantation and its applications to human diseases. Articles focus on a myriad of topics including the physiological, medical, pre-clinical, tissue engineering, stem cell, and device-oriented aspects of the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and endothelial systems, as well as genetically engineered cells. Cell Transplantation also reports on relevant technological advances, clinical studies, and regulatory considerations related to the implantation of cells into the body in order to provide complete coverage of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信