Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review

Jean Hunleth , Sarah Burack , Lindsey Kaufman , Caroline Mohrmann , Thembekile Shato , Eric Wiedenman , Janet Njelesani
{"title":"Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review","authors":"Jean Hunleth ,&nbsp;Sarah Burack ,&nbsp;Lindsey Kaufman ,&nbsp;Caroline Mohrmann ,&nbsp;Thembekile Shato ,&nbsp;Eric Wiedenman ,&nbsp;Janet Njelesani","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An integral part of understanding and then designing programs to reduce childhood cancer inequities includes adequate representation of people with cancer in research, including children. A scoping review was carried out to understand how cancer research is oriented toward inequities and to identify who has participated in childhood qualitative cancer research. A systematic search identified 119 qualitative studies that met inclusion criteria, with most studies taking place in high-income countries (n=84). Overall, data were lacking on social determinants of health at multiple levels—structural, household, child, and guardian. Only 29 studies reported on race and/or ethnicity, with the majority of those including predominantly or all white children. Six articles included socioeconomic information, and across most articles, attention was absent to the financial ramifications of cancer care. Limited reporting of sociodemographics highlights a broader issue of neglecting key demographics and social factors that contribute to inequities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000308/pdfft?md5=d1dbc3ad73b75049f0309e8e65b7d4c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2772610X24000308-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An integral part of understanding and then designing programs to reduce childhood cancer inequities includes adequate representation of people with cancer in research, including children. A scoping review was carried out to understand how cancer research is oriented toward inequities and to identify who has participated in childhood qualitative cancer research. A systematic search identified 119 qualitative studies that met inclusion criteria, with most studies taking place in high-income countries (n=84). Overall, data were lacking on social determinants of health at multiple levels—structural, household, child, and guardian. Only 29 studies reported on race and/or ethnicity, with the majority of those including predominantly or all white children. Six articles included socioeconomic information, and across most articles, attention was absent to the financial ramifications of cancer care. Limited reporting of sociodemographics highlights a broader issue of neglecting key demographics and social factors that contribute to inequities.

儿童癌症研究中的不公平现象:范围审查
要了解并设计减少儿童癌症不公平现象的计划,其中一个不可或缺的部分就是让包括儿童在内的癌症患者充分参与研究。为了了解癌症研究是如何面向不公平现象的,并确定哪些人参与了儿童癌症定性研究,我们进行了一次范围界定审查。通过系统性检索,发现了 119 项符合纳入标准的定性研究,其中大部分研究发生在高收入国家(n=84)。总体而言,缺乏关于健康的社会决定因素在结构、家庭、儿童和监护人等多个层面的数据。仅有 29 项研究报告了种族和/或民族情况,其中大部分主要包括或全部包括白人儿童。有六篇文章包含了社会经济信息,大多数文章都没有关注癌症治疗的经济影响。对社会人口统计信息的有限报道凸显了一个更广泛的问题,即忽略了导致不平等的关键人口统计和社会因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信