Entre santé et science : littératie en santé et perception de la recherche médicale.

IF 0.3 4区医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Sante Publique Pub Date : 2024-01-01

Émilien Schultz, Jeremy K Ward, Rajae Touzani, Alexandra Rouquette, Julien Mancini

{"title":"Entre santé et science : littératie en santé et perception de la recherche médicale.","authors":"Émilien Schultz, Jeremy K Ward, Rajae Touzani, Alexandra Rouquette, Julien Mancini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Biomedical innovation plays an important role in health care pathways and public debates. Nevertheless, existing measures of health literacy take little account of medical research. In this article, we explore the relationship between health literacy and attitudes toward medical research, from clinical trials to more general attitudes toward science.Methods: We analyze the results of two self-administered questionnaires conducted on samples of the French adult population in 2020 and 2021 (N=2003 and N=2022). A series of twelve questions assessed health literacy (HLS19-Q12-EN) and ten questions addressed attitudes to clinical trials, medical research, and science in general. The analyses characterize the population’s perception of medical research issues and its association with health literacy.Results: There is a significant association between health literacy and perception of research. A low level of literacy is associated with lower knowledge of clinical trials and a more negative attitude toward them, less confidence in science and its contributions to society.Conclusions: Given the continuity between care and research, health literacy is likely to be a relevant measure for characterizing disparity in attitudes toward clinical trials and improving access to innovation.","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Biomedical innovation plays an important role in health care pathways and public debates. Nevertheless, existing measures of health literacy take little account of medical research. In this article, we explore the relationship between health literacy and attitudes toward medical research, from clinical trials to more general attitudes toward science.

Methods: We analyze the results of two self-administered questionnaires conducted on samples of the French adult population in 2020 and 2021 (N=2003 and N=2022). A series of twelve questions assessed health literacy (HLS19-Q12-EN) and ten questions addressed attitudes to clinical trials, medical research, and science in general. The analyses characterize the population’s perception of medical research issues and its association with health literacy.

Results: There is a significant association between health literacy and perception of research. A low level of literacy is associated with lower knowledge of clinical trials and a more negative attitude toward them, less confidence in science and its contributions to society.

Conclusions: Given the continuity between care and research, health literacy is likely to be a relevant measure for characterizing disparity in attitudes toward clinical trials and improving access to innovation.

本刊更多论文

在健康与科学之间：健康素养与对医学研究的认识。

目的：生物医学创新在医疗保健途径和公众辩论中发挥着重要作用。然而，现有的健康素养衡量标准很少考虑医学研究。在本文中，我们探讨了健康素养与医学研究态度之间的关系，从临床试验到对科学的一般态度：我们分析了 2020 年和 2021 年对法国成年人口样本（N=2003 和 N=2022）进行的两次自填式问卷调查的结果。其中12个问题评估健康素养（HLS19-Q12-EN），10个问题涉及对临床试验、医学研究和一般科学的态度。分析描述了人们对医学研究问题的看法及其与健康素养的关系：结果：健康素养与对研究的看法之间存在明显的关联。识字水平低的人对临床试验的了解较少，对临床试验的态度较为消极，对科学及其对社会的贡献信心不足：鉴于医疗与研究之间的连续性，健康素养很可能是衡量临床试验态度差异和改善创新机会的相关指标。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

33.30%

发文量

252

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc