Even a Low Comorbidity Burden Predicts Poor Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure.

Q3 Medicine
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000368
Catarina Elias, Ana Neves, Rita Gouveia, Sérgio Madureira, Pedro Ribeirinho-Soares, Marta Soares-Carreira, Joana Pereira, Jorge Almeida, Patrícia Lourenço
{"title":"Even a Low Comorbidity Burden Predicts Poor Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure.","authors":"Catarina Elias, Ana Neves, Rita Gouveia, Sérgio Madureira, Pedro Ribeirinho-Soares, Marta Soares-Carreira, Joana Pereira, Jorge Almeida, Patrícia Lourenço","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with heart failure often have multiple cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and comorbidities (CMBs). We evaluated the impact of additive CMB and CVRF on heart failure prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed ambulatory patients with systolic dysfunction between January 2012 and May 2018. Follow-up was until January 2021. The endpoint was all-cause death. CVRF analyzed arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. CMB evaluated coronary artery disease, noncoronary atherosclerotic disease, respiratory disease, dementia, anemia, chronic kidney disease, inflammatory/autoimmune disease, active cancer, and atrial fibrillation. Classification according to the number of CVRFs and/or CMBs is <2 and ≥2. The independent prognostic impact of CVRF/CMB burden was assessed with multivariate Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients had ≥2 CMBs (67.9%). Regarding CVRF, 14.9% presented none, 40.2% had 1, and 32.1% had 2. During a median 49-month follow-up, 419 (49.1%) patients died. Mortality was higher among patients with ≥2 CVRFs (56.1 versus 43.4% in those with <2) and in those with ≥2 CMBs (57.7 versus 31.0%). While patients with 1 CMB had similar mortality than those with none. Patients with ≥2 CMBs had higher long-term mortality risk: hazard ratio (HR), 2.47 (95% CI, 1.95-3.14). In patients with ≥2CVRFs, the HR of dying is 1.39 (95% CI, 1.14-1.70). When taken together, there was a clear survival disadvantage for patients with ≥2 CVRFs/CMBs-adjusted HR, 2.20 (95% CI, 1.45-3.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of only 2 CVRFs/CMBs more than doubles the patients´ risk of dying. CVRF and CMB should be assessed as part of routine patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with heart failure often have multiple cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and comorbidities (CMBs). We evaluated the impact of additive CMB and CVRF on heart failure prognosis.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed ambulatory patients with systolic dysfunction between January 2012 and May 2018. Follow-up was until January 2021. The endpoint was all-cause death. CVRF analyzed arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. CMB evaluated coronary artery disease, noncoronary atherosclerotic disease, respiratory disease, dementia, anemia, chronic kidney disease, inflammatory/autoimmune disease, active cancer, and atrial fibrillation. Classification according to the number of CVRFs and/or CMBs is <2 and ≥2. The independent prognostic impact of CVRF/CMB burden was assessed with multivariate Cox regression.

Results: Most patients had ≥2 CMBs (67.9%). Regarding CVRF, 14.9% presented none, 40.2% had 1, and 32.1% had 2. During a median 49-month follow-up, 419 (49.1%) patients died. Mortality was higher among patients with ≥2 CVRFs (56.1 versus 43.4% in those with <2) and in those with ≥2 CMBs (57.7 versus 31.0%). While patients with 1 CMB had similar mortality than those with none. Patients with ≥2 CMBs had higher long-term mortality risk: hazard ratio (HR), 2.47 (95% CI, 1.95-3.14). In patients with ≥2CVRFs, the HR of dying is 1.39 (95% CI, 1.14-1.70). When taken together, there was a clear survival disadvantage for patients with ≥2 CVRFs/CMBs-adjusted HR, 2.20 (95% CI, 1.45-3.34).

Conclusions: The presence of only 2 CVRFs/CMBs more than doubles the patients´ risk of dying. CVRF and CMB should be assessed as part of routine patient management.

即使合并症负担较低,也会导致慢性心力衰竭患者预后不佳。
背景:心力衰竭(HF)患者通常具有多种心血管风险因素(CVRF)和合并症(CMB)。我们评估了CMB和CVRF叠加对HF预后的影响:我们对 2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 5 月期间患有收缩功能障碍的流动患者进行了回顾性分析。随访:直至 2021 年 1 月。终点:全因死亡。分析了 CVRF:动脉高血压、糖尿病和吸烟。CMB评估:冠状动脉疾病、非冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病、呼吸系统疾病、痴呆、贫血、慢性肾脏疾病、炎症/自身免疫性疾病、活动性癌症和心房颤动。根据 CVRF 和/或 CMB 的数量进行分类:< 2 和 ≥ 2。通过多变量 Cox 回归评估了 CVRF/CMB 负担对预后的独立影响:大多数患者的CMB≥2(67.9%)。在CVRF方面,14.9%的患者无CVRF,40.2%的患者有1个,32.1%的患者有2个。在中位 49 个月的随访期间,419 名患者(49.1%)死亡。CVRF≥2个的患者死亡率更高(56.1%对43.4%):仅有 2 个 CVRF/CMB 会使患者的死亡风险增加一倍以上。CVRF和CMB应作为常规患者管理的一部分进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信