{"title":"The Current State of Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma","authors":"Elias A. T. Koch, Markus V. Heppt, Carola Berking","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00872-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Uveal melanoma (UM) is genetically a distinct tumor compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), and due to its low mutational burden, it is far less perceptible to the immune system. Thus, treatments that have revolutionized the treatment of CM remain widely inefficient in metastatic UM or only demonstrate effectiveness in a small subpopulation of patients. To this end, the therapeutic benefit of immune checkpoint blockade is very limited and may come at the expense of severe immune-related adverse events that could potentially affect all organ systems. Notably, tebentafusp, an entirely novel class of anti-cancer drugs, has received official authorization for the treatment of metastatic UM. It is the first agent that demonstrated a survival advantage in a randomized controlled trial of metastatic UM patients. Despite the survival benefit and approval, the restriction of tebentafusp to HLA-A*02:01-positive patients and the low objective response rate indicate the persistent need for additional therapies. Thus, liver-directed therapies are commonly used for tumor control of hepatic metastases and represent a central pillar of the daily management of liver-dominant disease. Further, promising data from targeted therapies independent of MEK-inhibitors, such as the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib, raise hope for additional options in metastatic UM in the future. This narrative review provides a timely and comprehensive overview of the current treatment landscape for metastatic UM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-024-00872-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is genetically a distinct tumor compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), and due to its low mutational burden, it is far less perceptible to the immune system. Thus, treatments that have revolutionized the treatment of CM remain widely inefficient in metastatic UM or only demonstrate effectiveness in a small subpopulation of patients. To this end, the therapeutic benefit of immune checkpoint blockade is very limited and may come at the expense of severe immune-related adverse events that could potentially affect all organ systems. Notably, tebentafusp, an entirely novel class of anti-cancer drugs, has received official authorization for the treatment of metastatic UM. It is the first agent that demonstrated a survival advantage in a randomized controlled trial of metastatic UM patients. Despite the survival benefit and approval, the restriction of tebentafusp to HLA-A*02:01-positive patients and the low objective response rate indicate the persistent need for additional therapies. Thus, liver-directed therapies are commonly used for tumor control of hepatic metastases and represent a central pillar of the daily management of liver-dominant disease. Further, promising data from targeted therapies independent of MEK-inhibitors, such as the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib, raise hope for additional options in metastatic UM in the future. This narrative review provides a timely and comprehensive overview of the current treatment landscape for metastatic UM.
葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)与皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)相比,在基因上是一种独特的肿瘤,而且由于其突变负荷低,免疫系统对它的感知能力要差得多。因此,已经彻底改变了皮肤黑色素瘤治疗方法的治疗方法在转移性皮肤黑色素瘤中仍然普遍无效,或者只在一小部分患者中有效。为此,免疫检查点阻断疗法的治疗效果非常有限,而且可能以可能影响所有器官系统的严重免疫相关不良事件为代价。值得注意的是,作为一种全新的抗癌药物,特本伐普已获得治疗转移性 UM 的正式授权。这是第一种在转移性 UM 患者随机对照试验中显示出生存优势的药物。尽管获得了生存优势和批准,但特本伐斯普仅限于 HLA-A*02:01 阳性患者使用,而且客观反应率较低,这表明仍然需要其他疗法。因此,肝脏靶向疗法通常用于控制肝转移瘤,是肝脏占位性疾病日常治疗的核心支柱。此外,独立于MEK抑制剂的靶向疗法(如darovasertib和crizotinib的联合疗法)也取得了令人鼓舞的数据,为未来转移性UM的更多选择带来了希望。这篇叙述性综述及时、全面地概述了目前转移性 UM 的治疗情况。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.