Investigating angiogenin/ribonuclease 5 as a diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer: In-depth analysis from a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Amir Hossein Aalami , Hossein Abdeahad , Farnoosh Aalami , Thozhukat Sathyapalan , Amirhossein Sahebkar
{"title":"Investigating angiogenin/ribonuclease 5 as a diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer: In-depth analysis from a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Amir Hossein Aalami ,&nbsp;Hossein Abdeahad ,&nbsp;Farnoosh Aalami ,&nbsp;Thozhukat Sathyapalan ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Sahebkar","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bladder cancer (BC) represents a prevalent malignancy in North America and Europe, posing significant health burdens. The identification of a reliable biomarker for early BC detection is imperative to enhance prognostic outcomes. Our aim for this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy and potential clinical utility of Angiogenin/Ribonuclease 5 (ANG/RNase 5) as a biomarker for detection of BC. A systematic literature search across multiple databases up to March 20, 2024, was conducted. CMA 3.7 and Meta-disk 1.4 were used to analyze specificity, sensitivity, AUC, DOR, LR+, LR-, Q*index, and SROC for ANG as a urinary biomarker in BC patients. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s regression asymmetry and Begg’s rank correlation tests. Additional diagnosing analyses were performed using Python programming language version 3.12.1. In this meta-analysis of seven case-control studies comprising 1,051 participants (576 cases and 481 controls), pooled sensitivity was 0.701 (95 % CI: 0.662–0.738), specificity was 0.787 (95 % CI: 0.752–0.819), LR + was 3.582 (95 % CI: 2.260–5.676), LR- was 0.398 (95 % CI: 0.327–0.485), and DOR was 10.637 (95 % CI: 6.106–18.529). The AUC and Q* index values were 0.823 and 0.756, respectively. Both Begg and Mazumdar Rank Correlation Test (p = 0.229) and Egger’s Test of the Intercept (p = 0.135) revealed no significant evidence of publication bias. Our meta-analysis confirms ANG/RNase 5 as a reliable biomarker for early bladder cancer detection, showing strong diagnostic accuracy and no publication bias.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) represents a prevalent malignancy in North America and Europe, posing significant health burdens. The identification of a reliable biomarker for early BC detection is imperative to enhance prognostic outcomes. Our aim for this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy and potential clinical utility of Angiogenin/Ribonuclease 5 (ANG/RNase 5) as a biomarker for detection of BC. A systematic literature search across multiple databases up to March 20, 2024, was conducted. CMA 3.7 and Meta-disk 1.4 were used to analyze specificity, sensitivity, AUC, DOR, LR+, LR-, Q*index, and SROC for ANG as a urinary biomarker in BC patients. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s regression asymmetry and Begg’s rank correlation tests. Additional diagnosing analyses were performed using Python programming language version 3.12.1. In this meta-analysis of seven case-control studies comprising 1,051 participants (576 cases and 481 controls), pooled sensitivity was 0.701 (95 % CI: 0.662–0.738), specificity was 0.787 (95 % CI: 0.752–0.819), LR + was 3.582 (95 % CI: 2.260–5.676), LR- was 0.398 (95 % CI: 0.327–0.485), and DOR was 10.637 (95 % CI: 6.106–18.529). The AUC and Q* index values were 0.823 and 0.756, respectively. Both Begg and Mazumdar Rank Correlation Test (p = 0.229) and Egger’s Test of the Intercept (p = 0.135) revealed no significant evidence of publication bias. Our meta-analysis confirms ANG/RNase 5 as a reliable biomarker for early bladder cancer detection, showing strong diagnostic accuracy and no publication bias.

研究作为膀胱癌诊断生物标志物的血管生成素/核糖核酸酶 5:系统综述和荟萃分析的深入分析。
膀胱癌(BC)是北美和欧洲的一种常见恶性肿瘤,给人们的健康造成了巨大负担。为提高预后效果,确定早期膀胱癌检测的可靠生物标志物势在必行。本研究旨在确定血管生成素/核糖核酸酶 5 (ANG/RNase 5) 作为检测 BC 的生物标记物的诊断准确性和潜在临床实用性。截至 2024 年 3 月 20 日,在多个数据库中进行了系统性文献检索。使用CMA 3.7和Meta-disk 1.4分析了ANG作为BC患者尿液生物标记物的特异性、灵敏度、AUC、DOR、LR+、LR-、Q*指数和SROC。采用Egger回归不对称、Begg秩相关以及修剪和填充法测试评估了发表偏倚。其他诊断分析使用 Python 编程语言 3.12.1 版本进行。在这项由 1,051 名参与者(576 例病例和 481 例对照)组成的七项病例对照研究的荟萃分析中,汇总灵敏度为 0.701(95 % CI:0.662-0.特异性为 0.787(95 % CI:0.752-0.819),LR + 为 3.582(95 % CI:2.260-5.676),LR- 为 0.398(95 % CI:0.327-0.485),DOR 为 10.637(95 % CI:6.106-18.529)。AUC 和 Q* 指数值分别为 0.823 和 0.756。Begg和Mazumdar秩相关检验(P = 0.229)和Egger截距检验(P = 0.135)均未显示明显的发表偏倚证据。我们的荟萃分析证实 ANG/RNase 5 是早期膀胱癌检测的可靠生物标记物,具有很高的诊断准确性,且无发表偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信