Effectiveness and Safety of Shengmai San for Viral Myocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bing-rui Zhang, Xue-han Liu, Yu-tong Ling, Chun-li Lu, Xin-yan Jin, Yi-ming Wei, Yi-qing Cai, Nicola Robinson, Jian-ping Liu
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety of Shengmai San for Viral Myocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Bing-rui Zhang,&nbsp;Xue-han Liu,&nbsp;Yu-tong Ling,&nbsp;Chun-li Lu,&nbsp;Xin-yan Jin,&nbsp;Yi-ming Wei,&nbsp;Yi-qing Cai,&nbsp;Nicola Robinson,&nbsp;Jian-ping Liu","doi":"10.1155/2024/2127018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Shengmai San (SMS) is a traditional Chinese medicine formula used for supplementing <i>Qi</i> and <i>Yin</i> and can mitigate symptoms related to malignant arrhythmia and heart failure. This systematic review aimed at exploring the effectiveness and safety of SMS for viral myocarditis (VMC).</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Eight databases from their inception to June 2023 were searched to identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on SMS for VMC. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess methodological quality. Mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and input into the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Forty-four RCTs were included involving 4298 participants. The interventions included 29 types of modified SMS decoctions and 15 patent medicines. Overall study quality was low. Compared with western medicine (WM), SMS was associated with higher recovery rate from palpitations (RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.59, 3.33, 2 RCTs, <i>n</i> = 89), chest pain (RR 1.57, 95% CI [1.17, 2.09], 2 RCTs, <i>n</i> = 89), and lower cTnI (MD −0.82 ng/ml, 95% CI −0.98, −0.66, 1 RCT, <i>n</i> = 60). SMS plus WM was more effective than WM in palpitation recovery rate (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.21, 1.92, 3 RCTs, <i>n</i> = 136), dyspnea recovery rate (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12, 1.94, 3 RCT, <i>n</i> = 267), ECG (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.32, 1.55, 20 RCT, <i>n</i> = 2035), CK-MB (MD −6.36, 95% CI −8.43, −4.28, 8 RCT, <i>n</i> = 946), and cTnI (MD −0.06, 95% CI −0.06, −0.05, 3 RCT, <i>n</i> = 307). No serious adverse events were reported using SMS alone or in combination with WM.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> SMS used alone or combined with WM may have potential effectiveness on symptom alleviation, ECG recovery rate, myocardial injury markers, and cardiac function, but the effectiveness is uncertain due to the low quality and absence of placebo-controlled trials. The exact efficacy of SMS for VMC needs to be confirmed by high-quality double-blind RCTs in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9582,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2127018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2127018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shengmai San (SMS) is a traditional Chinese medicine formula used for supplementing Qi and Yin and can mitigate symptoms related to malignant arrhythmia and heart failure. This systematic review aimed at exploring the effectiveness and safety of SMS for viral myocarditis (VMC).

Methods: Eight databases from their inception to June 2023 were searched to identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on SMS for VMC. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess methodological quality. Mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and input into the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.

Results: Forty-four RCTs were included involving 4298 participants. The interventions included 29 types of modified SMS decoctions and 15 patent medicines. Overall study quality was low. Compared with western medicine (WM), SMS was associated with higher recovery rate from palpitations (RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.59, 3.33, 2 RCTs, n = 89), chest pain (RR 1.57, 95% CI [1.17, 2.09], 2 RCTs, n = 89), and lower cTnI (MD −0.82 ng/ml, 95% CI −0.98, −0.66, 1 RCT, n = 60). SMS plus WM was more effective than WM in palpitation recovery rate (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.21, 1.92, 3 RCTs, n = 136), dyspnea recovery rate (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12, 1.94, 3 RCT, n = 267), ECG (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.32, 1.55, 20 RCT, n = 2035), CK-MB (MD −6.36, 95% CI −8.43, −4.28, 8 RCT, n = 946), and cTnI (MD −0.06, 95% CI −0.06, −0.05, 3 RCT, n = 307). No serious adverse events were reported using SMS alone or in combination with WM.

Conclusion: SMS used alone or combined with WM may have potential effectiveness on symptom alleviation, ECG recovery rate, myocardial injury markers, and cardiac function, but the effectiveness is uncertain due to the low quality and absence of placebo-controlled trials. The exact efficacy of SMS for VMC needs to be confirmed by high-quality double-blind RCTs in the future.

Abstract Image

生脉散治疗病毒性心肌炎的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析
背景:生脉散(SMS)是一种用于补气养阴的传统中药方剂,可减轻恶性心律失常和心力衰竭的相关症状。本系统综述旨在探讨生脉散治疗病毒性心肌炎(VMC)的有效性和安全性:方法:检索了从开始到2023年6月的8个数据库,以确定SMS治疗病毒性心肌炎的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。使用RevMan 5.4计算平均差(MD)、标准化平均差(SMD)、风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI),并将其输入荟萃分析:共纳入 44 项 RCT,涉及 4298 名参与者。干预措施包括 29 种改良 SMS 煎剂和 15 种中成药。总体研究质量较低。与西药(WM)相比,SMS 与更高的心悸恢复率(RR 2.3,95% CI 1.59,3.33,2 项 RCT,n = 89)、胸痛恢复率(RR 1.57,95% CI [1.17,2.09],2 项 RCT,n = 89)和更低的 cTnI(MD -0.82ng/ml,95% CI -0.98,-0.66,1 项 RCT,n = 60)相关。在心悸恢复率(RR 1.52,95% CI 1.21,1.92,3 项 RCT,n = 136)、呼吸困难恢复率(RR 1.47,95% CI 1.12,1.94,3 项 RCT,n = 267)、心电图(RR 1.43,95% CI 1.32,1.55,20 项 RCT,n = 2035)、CK-MB(MD -6.36,95% CI -8.43,-4.28,8 项 RCT,n = 946)和 cTnI(MD -0.06,95% CI -0.06,-0.05,3 项 RCT,n = 307)。单独使用SMS或与WM联合使用均未出现严重不良事件:SMS单独使用或与WM联合使用可能对症状缓解、心电图恢复率、心肌损伤标志物和心功能有潜在疗效,但由于安慰剂对照试验质量低且缺乏,疗效尚不确定。SMS对创伤性心肌梗死的确切疗效需要在未来通过高质量的双盲 RCT 试验来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Therapeutics 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Therapeutics (formerly Cardiovascular Drug Reviews) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on cardiovascular and clinical pharmacology, as well as clinical trials of new cardiovascular therapies. Articles on translational research, pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, device, gene and cell therapies, and pharmacoepidemiology are also encouraged. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Acute coronary syndrome Arrhythmias Atherosclerosis Basic cardiac electrophysiology Cardiac catheterization Cardiac remodeling Coagulation and thrombosis Diabetic cardiovascular disease Heart failure (systolic HF, HFrEF, diastolic HF, HFpEF) Hyperlipidemia Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Vascular biology Ventricular assist devices Molecular cardio-biology Myocardial regeneration Lipoprotein metabolism Radial artery access Percutaneous coronary intervention Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信