Geochronology of the Paleoproterozoic Helanshan ductile shear zones: Insights into temporal framework of polyphase deformation in the Khondalite Belt, North China Craton
Hengzhong Qiao , Guochun Zhao , Changqing Yin , Jiahui Qian , Shangjing Wu , Peipei Deng , Jiawei Li
{"title":"Geochronology of the Paleoproterozoic Helanshan ductile shear zones: Insights into temporal framework of polyphase deformation in the Khondalite Belt, North China Craton","authors":"Hengzhong Qiao , Guochun Zhao , Changqing Yin , Jiahui Qian , Shangjing Wu , Peipei Deng , Jiawei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Khondalite Belt has been regarded as a Paleoproterozoic collisional orogen in the northwestern North China Craton, but the geochronological framework of polyphase deformation in the Khondalite Belt still remains unclear, particularly the timing of orogen-parallel ductile shearing. In this study, we conducted field-based structural analysis and LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb geochronology on the Helanshan ductile shear zones (HDSZ) in the Khondalite Belt. The results show that three pre-kinematic leucocratic dykes have been reworked by the shear zones and yielded magmatic zircon ages of 1934 ± 13 Ma, 1924 ± 5 Ma and 1920 ± 24 Ma. Two <em>syn</em>-kinematic leucocratic dykes appeared along the mylonitic foliations and were dated at 1887 ± 21 Ma and 1871 ± 28 Ma. A post-kinematic leucocratic dyke cut the mylonitic foliations and gave a crystallization age of 1816 ± 28 Ma. These emplacement ages of shear zone-related dykes constrain the development of the HDSZ at some time between ∼ 1920 Ma and ∼ 1816 Ma. Meanwhile, zircon overgrowth rims from three intrusions that suffered the shear deformation exhibited metamorphic ages of 1904 ± 11 Ma, 1840 ± 13 Ma and 1826 ± 31 Ma. Similar metamorphic ages of 1901 ± 7 Ma, 1888 ± 8 Ma and 1849 ± 29 Ma were also obtained from high-temperature felsic, pelitic and calcitic mylonites. These results further unravel that the HDSZ most likely developed at ca. 1904–1826 Ma. Additionally, we have summarized available deformation-related geochronological data in the Khondalite Belt, and proposed that this belt underwent three major phases of deformation (D<sub>1</sub>-D<sub>3</sub>) in the Orosirian. D<sub>1</sub> mainly produced overturned to recumbent isoclinal folds F<sub>1</sub>, penetrative transposition foliations S<sub>1</sub> and mineral lineations L<sub>1</sub> at ca. 1.97–1.93 Ga. Subsequently, D<sub>2</sub> dominantly resulted in tight to open upright folds F<sub>2</sub> at ca. 1.93–1.90 Ga. Later, D<sub>3</sub> generated a series of NE- to E-trending orogen-parallel ductile shear zones at ca. 1.90–1.82 Ga. Together with multiple high-grade metamorphism and magmatism, the D<sub>1</sub>-D<sub>3</sub> deformation recorded a complex protracted orogeny (>100 Myr) in response to the collision between the Yinshan and Ordos blocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49674,"journal":{"name":"Precambrian Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precambrian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824001943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Khondalite Belt has been regarded as a Paleoproterozoic collisional orogen in the northwestern North China Craton, but the geochronological framework of polyphase deformation in the Khondalite Belt still remains unclear, particularly the timing of orogen-parallel ductile shearing. In this study, we conducted field-based structural analysis and LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb geochronology on the Helanshan ductile shear zones (HDSZ) in the Khondalite Belt. The results show that three pre-kinematic leucocratic dykes have been reworked by the shear zones and yielded magmatic zircon ages of 1934 ± 13 Ma, 1924 ± 5 Ma and 1920 ± 24 Ma. Two syn-kinematic leucocratic dykes appeared along the mylonitic foliations and were dated at 1887 ± 21 Ma and 1871 ± 28 Ma. A post-kinematic leucocratic dyke cut the mylonitic foliations and gave a crystallization age of 1816 ± 28 Ma. These emplacement ages of shear zone-related dykes constrain the development of the HDSZ at some time between ∼ 1920 Ma and ∼ 1816 Ma. Meanwhile, zircon overgrowth rims from three intrusions that suffered the shear deformation exhibited metamorphic ages of 1904 ± 11 Ma, 1840 ± 13 Ma and 1826 ± 31 Ma. Similar metamorphic ages of 1901 ± 7 Ma, 1888 ± 8 Ma and 1849 ± 29 Ma were also obtained from high-temperature felsic, pelitic and calcitic mylonites. These results further unravel that the HDSZ most likely developed at ca. 1904–1826 Ma. Additionally, we have summarized available deformation-related geochronological data in the Khondalite Belt, and proposed that this belt underwent three major phases of deformation (D1-D3) in the Orosirian. D1 mainly produced overturned to recumbent isoclinal folds F1, penetrative transposition foliations S1 and mineral lineations L1 at ca. 1.97–1.93 Ga. Subsequently, D2 dominantly resulted in tight to open upright folds F2 at ca. 1.93–1.90 Ga. Later, D3 generated a series of NE- to E-trending orogen-parallel ductile shear zones at ca. 1.90–1.82 Ga. Together with multiple high-grade metamorphism and magmatism, the D1-D3 deformation recorded a complex protracted orogeny (>100 Myr) in response to the collision between the Yinshan and Ordos blocks.
期刊介绍:
Precambrian Research publishes studies on all aspects of the early stages of the composition, structure and evolution of the Earth and its planetary neighbours. With a focus on process-oriented and comparative studies, it covers, but is not restricted to, subjects such as:
(1) Chemical, biological, biochemical and cosmochemical evolution; the origin of life; the evolution of the oceans and atmosphere; the early fossil record; palaeobiology;
(2) Geochronology and isotope and elemental geochemistry;
(3) Precambrian mineral deposits;
(4) Geophysical aspects of the early Earth and Precambrian terrains;
(5) Nature, formation and evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere and mantle including magmatic, depositional, metamorphic and tectonic processes.
In addition, the editors particularly welcome integrated process-oriented studies that involve a combination of the above fields and comparative studies that demonstrate the effect of Precambrian evolution on Phanerozoic earth system processes.
Regional and localised studies of Precambrian phenomena are considered appropriate only when the detail and quality allow illustration of a wider process, or when significant gaps in basic knowledge of a particular area can be filled.