Georgina Spies, Jessica Huss, Oscar Motswage, Soraya Seedat, Christiane Eichenberg
{"title":"Attitudes of patients and mental health professionals towards hypothetical use of serious games in psychotherapy.","authors":"Georgina Spies, Jessica Huss, Oscar Motswage, Soraya Seedat, Christiane Eichenberg","doi":"10.1177/14604582241259343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serious games are increasingly being applied within healthcare, but their integration in psychotherapeutic settings is less documented.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study sought to identify the attitudes of psychotherapists and patients towards the hypothetical use of serious games in psychotherapy in the South African context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online surveys assessed acceptance, experience, and requirements for the utilisation of serious games in therapeutic contexts. Clients utilising mental health services (<i>n</i> = 209) and psychotherapists delivering mental health services (<i>n</i> = 156) in South Africa completed the online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knowledge about serious games is limited with only 15% of clients and 16% of therapists reporting knowledge of the existence and application of serious games. Use of serious games is even more infrequent with only 1% of therapists and 6% of clients currently using serious games as an intervention. Despite this, our findings highlight an apparent demand for their use, with 71% of therapists indicating that serious games would be a suitable adjunct treatment modality for their patients. Our results show a general openness toward the use of serious games in psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of serious games as an e-mental health treatment modality is conceivable for both patients and therapists, particularly as a complementary strategy to traditional face-to-face psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 2","pages":"14604582241259343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241259343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Serious games are increasingly being applied within healthcare, but their integration in psychotherapeutic settings is less documented.
Objectives: The present study sought to identify the attitudes of psychotherapists and patients towards the hypothetical use of serious games in psychotherapy in the South African context.
Methods: Online surveys assessed acceptance, experience, and requirements for the utilisation of serious games in therapeutic contexts. Clients utilising mental health services (n = 209) and psychotherapists delivering mental health services (n = 156) in South Africa completed the online survey.
Results: Knowledge about serious games is limited with only 15% of clients and 16% of therapists reporting knowledge of the existence and application of serious games. Use of serious games is even more infrequent with only 1% of therapists and 6% of clients currently using serious games as an intervention. Despite this, our findings highlight an apparent demand for their use, with 71% of therapists indicating that serious games would be a suitable adjunct treatment modality for their patients. Our results show a general openness toward the use of serious games in psychotherapy.
Conclusion: The use of serious games as an e-mental health treatment modality is conceivable for both patients and therapists, particularly as a complementary strategy to traditional face-to-face psychotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.