Potassium-competitive acid blockers and proton-pump inhibitors for healing of erosive esophagitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-06-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241251567
Yin Liu, Zhifeng Gao, XiaoHua Hou
{"title":"Potassium-competitive acid blockers and proton-pump inhibitors for healing of erosive esophagitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yin Liu, Zhifeng Gao, XiaoHua Hou","doi":"10.1177/17562848241251567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are recommended for erosive esophagitis (EE), with good safety and tolerance. However, it is unclear which is the best treatment option for EE.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of P-CABs and PPIs for healing EE patients, seeking an appropriate treatment choice in the 4- or 8-week treatment and standard or double dose.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>Relevant databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of PPIs and P-CABs in the treatment of EE up to 31 May 2023. Studies on standard or double-dose PPIs or P-CABs which were published in English and assessed 4- or 8-week healing effects in EE were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments under the frequentist framework. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses of patients with different baseline EE were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 34 studies involving 25,054 patients and 9 PPIs, 6 P-CABs, or placebo treatment interventions were included. The pooled 4-week healing rate was significantly statistically lower than the pooled 8-week healing rate for most treatments. Besides, the higher healing rate of double-dose treatment than standard-dose treatment was not observed in the initial treatment of most drugs. The main analysis only included studies conducted for both patients with and without severe EE at baseline, and the proportion of severe EE included in the study was >10%, Keverprazan 20 mg qd ranked best with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 84.7, followed by Ilaprazole 10 mg qd with a SUCRA value of 82.0, for the healing rate at 8 weeks. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Subgroup analysis showed that most P-CABs had higher healing rates than PPIs, particularly for patients with severe EE. And the healing rate of Keverprazan 20 mg qd at 8 weeks ranked best in the subgroup without or with severe EE at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that an 8-week treatment seemed more effective than the 4-week treatment for healing EE patients. The healing effect of Keverprazan (20 mg qd) ranked best in 8-week treatment, for both severe and non-severe EE patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was registered with INPLASY (registration number INPLASY2023120053).</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241251567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are recommended for erosive esophagitis (EE), with good safety and tolerance. However, it is unclear which is the best treatment option for EE.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of P-CABs and PPIs for healing EE patients, seeking an appropriate treatment choice in the 4- or 8-week treatment and standard or double dose.

Design: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods: Relevant databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of PPIs and P-CABs in the treatment of EE up to 31 May 2023. Studies on standard or double-dose PPIs or P-CABs which were published in English and assessed 4- or 8-week healing effects in EE were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments under the frequentist framework. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses of patients with different baseline EE were also conducted.

Results: In all, 34 studies involving 25,054 patients and 9 PPIs, 6 P-CABs, or placebo treatment interventions were included. The pooled 4-week healing rate was significantly statistically lower than the pooled 8-week healing rate for most treatments. Besides, the higher healing rate of double-dose treatment than standard-dose treatment was not observed in the initial treatment of most drugs. The main analysis only included studies conducted for both patients with and without severe EE at baseline, and the proportion of severe EE included in the study was >10%, Keverprazan 20 mg qd ranked best with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 84.7, followed by Ilaprazole 10 mg qd with a SUCRA value of 82.0, for the healing rate at 8 weeks. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Subgroup analysis showed that most P-CABs had higher healing rates than PPIs, particularly for patients with severe EE. And the healing rate of Keverprazan 20 mg qd at 8 weeks ranked best in the subgroup without or with severe EE at baseline.

Conclusion: This study showed that an 8-week treatment seemed more effective than the 4-week treatment for healing EE patients. The healing effect of Keverprazan (20 mg qd) ranked best in 8-week treatment, for both severe and non-severe EE patients.

Trial registration: The study protocol was registered with INPLASY (registration number INPLASY2023120053).

治疗侵蚀性食管炎的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂和质子泵抑制剂:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)和钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CABs)是治疗侵蚀性食管炎(EE)的推荐药物,具有良好的安全性和耐受性。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种药物是治疗侵蚀性食管炎的最佳选择:本研究旨在评估P-CABs和PPIs对治愈EE患者的疗效比较,寻求4周或8周疗程、标准剂量或双剂量的合适治疗方案:设计:系统综述和网络荟萃分析:检索相关数据库,收集截至 2023 年 5 月 31 日的 PPIs 和 P-CABs 治疗 EE 的随机对照试验。纳入了用英语发表的关于标准剂量或双剂量 PPIs 或 P-CABs 的研究,这些研究对 EE 的 4 周或 8 周疗效进行了评估。在频数主义框架下进行了网络荟萃分析,以评估治疗效果。此外,还对基线EE不同的患者进行了敏感性分析和亚组分析:共纳入了 34 项研究,涉及 25054 名患者和 9 种 PPIs、6 种 P-CABs 或安慰剂治疗干预。从统计学角度看,大多数治疗方法的汇总 4 周愈合率明显低于汇总 8 周愈合率。此外,在大多数药物的初始治疗中,并未观察到双剂量治疗的愈合率高于标准剂量治疗的愈合率。主要分析只纳入了对基线时有和没有严重 EE 的患者进行的研究,且纳入研究的严重 EE 比例大于 10%。在 8 周治愈率方面,开瑞普拉赞 20 毫克/天的累积排名曲线下表面值(SUCRA)为 84.7,排名最佳,其次是伊拉普拉唑 10 毫克/天,SUCRA 值为 82.0。敏感性分析表明结果是可靠的。亚组分析表明,大多数 P-CABs 的治愈率高于 PPIs,尤其是对于重度 EE 患者。在基线无或有严重 EE 的亚组中,Keverprazan 20 毫克 qd 8 周疗程的治愈率最高:结论:这项研究表明,8 周治疗似乎比 4 周治疗对 EE 患者的治愈效果更好。对于重度和非重度胃食管返流患者,8周疗法中开瑞坦(20 毫克/天)的疗效最佳:该研究方案已在INPLASY注册(注册号为INPLASY2023120053)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信