Puncture Capsulotomy Technique During Hip Arthroscopy.

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00061
Stephen M Gillinov, Bilal S Siddiq, Nathan J Cherian, Scott D Martin
{"title":"Puncture Capsulotomy Technique During Hip Arthroscopy.","authors":"Stephen M Gillinov, Bilal S Siddiq, Nathan J Cherian, Scott D Martin","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of techniques have been described to enter the capsule and gain access to the hip joint during hip arthroscopy<sup>1,2</sup>. Among these, the interportal and T-capsulotomies are the most commonly utilized; however, these approaches transect the iliofemoral ligament, which normally resists anterior subluxation and stabilizes extension<sup>3</sup>. Thus, these approaches may introduce capsuloligamentous instability<sup>1,4-7</sup> and have been associated with complications such as dislocation, postoperative pain, microinstability, seroma, and heterotopic ossification<sup>5,8-12</sup>. Although prior literature has demonstrated durable mid-term results for patients undergoing capsulotomies with capsular closure<sup>6,13</sup>, avoidance of iatrogenic injury to the hip capsule altogether is preferable. Thus, the puncture capsulotomy technique we present is minimally invasive, preserves the biomechanics of the hip joint and capsule without disrupting the iliofemoral ligament, and allows for appropriate visualization of the joint through placement of multiple small portals.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Following induction of anesthesia and with the patient supine on a hip traction table, the nonoperative leg is positioned at 45° abduction with support of a well-padded perineal post, and the operative hip is placed into valgus against the post<sup>14</sup>. Intra-articular fluid distention with normal saline solution is utilized to achieve approximately 9 mm of inferior migration of the femoral head and decrease risk of iatrogenic nerve injury<sup>15</sup>. Then, under fluoroscopic guidance, an anterolateral portal is created 1 cm anterior and 1 cm superior to the greater trochanter at an approximately 15° to 20° angle. Second, via arthroscopic visualization, the anterior portal is created 1 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the intersection of a vertical line drawn at the anterior superior iliac spine and a horizontal line at the level of the anterolateral portal. Third, equidistant between the anterior and anterolateral portals, the mid-anterior portal is created distally. Finally, at one-third of the distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the anterolateral portal, the Dienst portal is created. Thus, these 4 portals form a quadrilateral arrangement through which puncture capsulotomy can be performed<sup>5</sup>.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternative approaches to the hip capsule include interportal and T-capsulotomies, with or without capsular closure<sup>1,2,4,6,7,16</sup>. Although the most frequently utilized, these approaches transect the iliofemoral ligament and thus may introduce capsuloligamentous instability<sup>1,4-7,17</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The puncture capsulotomy technique has the advantage of maintaining the integrity of the capsule through the placement of 4 small portals. The technique does not transect the iliofemoral ligament and thus does not introduce capsuloligamentous instability. Furthermore, although good mid-term outcomes have been reported with capsular closure<sup>6,13,18</sup>, the present technique avoids creating unnecessary injury to the capsule and complications of an unrepaired capsule or, conversely, of plication.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Patients who underwent the puncture capsulotomy technique showed significant improvements in multiple functional outcome scores at a mean follow-up of 30.4 months, including the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) (39.6 preoperatively to 76.1 postoperatively), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL) (70.0 to 89.3), HOS Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) (41.8 to 75.7), and modified Harris hip score (mHHS) (60.1 to 84.9). At 2 years postoperatively with respect to iHOT-33, 81.0% of patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference, 62.0% achieved the patient acceptable symptom state, and 58.9% achieved substantial clinical benefit. In addition, mean visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly over the follow-up period (6.3 to 2.2; p < 0.001). Finally, there were zero occurrences of infection, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, dislocation or instability, or femoral neck fracture in patients treated with puncture capsulotomy<sup>19,20</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Anterolateral portal placement should be performed using the intra-articular fluid distention technique with fluoroscopy to avoid risk of iatrogenic labral damage and distraction-induced neurapraxia. Subsequent portals must then be placed under direct arthroscopic visualization.On establishment of the anterolateral portal, the scope should be switched to the anterior portal to ensure that the anterolateral portal has not been placed through the labrum and to adjust its placement to better access pathology. This portal, as well as all others, may be subsequently modified by adjusting the angle of the cannula, without making a new skin incision.If a cam lesion is located more anteromedially or posterolaterally, an additional accessory portal may be made distal or proximal to the anterolateral portal, respectively, in order to enhance visualization.Intermittent traction is utilized throughout the surgery. No traction is utilized during preparing and draping, suture tensioning and tie-down, and femoroplasty, with minimal traction during acetabuloplasty; these precautions serve to prevent iatrogenic superficial peroneal nerve injury.There can be a steep learning curve for this technique. In particular, greater surgical experience is required to perform adequate femoral osteoplasty for large cam lesions with this approach<sup>21</sup>.Instrument maneuverability and visualization can be somewhat constrained with this approach.It is more difficult to perform certain procedures with this technique, including segmental and circumferential labral reconstructions, particularly with remote grafts<sup>5</sup>.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>iHOT-33 = International Hip Outcome Tool-33HOS-ADL = Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscaleHOS-SSS = Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific SubscaleAP = anteroposteriorMRA = magnetic resonance arthrogramMRI = magnetic resonance imagingCT = computed tomographyASIS = anterior superior iliac spinemHHS = modified Harris hip score.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A number of techniques have been described to enter the capsule and gain access to the hip joint during hip arthroscopy1,2. Among these, the interportal and T-capsulotomies are the most commonly utilized; however, these approaches transect the iliofemoral ligament, which normally resists anterior subluxation and stabilizes extension3. Thus, these approaches may introduce capsuloligamentous instability1,4-7 and have been associated with complications such as dislocation, postoperative pain, microinstability, seroma, and heterotopic ossification5,8-12. Although prior literature has demonstrated durable mid-term results for patients undergoing capsulotomies with capsular closure6,13, avoidance of iatrogenic injury to the hip capsule altogether is preferable. Thus, the puncture capsulotomy technique we present is minimally invasive, preserves the biomechanics of the hip joint and capsule without disrupting the iliofemoral ligament, and allows for appropriate visualization of the joint through placement of multiple small portals.

Description: Following induction of anesthesia and with the patient supine on a hip traction table, the nonoperative leg is positioned at 45° abduction with support of a well-padded perineal post, and the operative hip is placed into valgus against the post14. Intra-articular fluid distention with normal saline solution is utilized to achieve approximately 9 mm of inferior migration of the femoral head and decrease risk of iatrogenic nerve injury15. Then, under fluoroscopic guidance, an anterolateral portal is created 1 cm anterior and 1 cm superior to the greater trochanter at an approximately 15° to 20° angle. Second, via arthroscopic visualization, the anterior portal is created 1 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the intersection of a vertical line drawn at the anterior superior iliac spine and a horizontal line at the level of the anterolateral portal. Third, equidistant between the anterior and anterolateral portals, the mid-anterior portal is created distally. Finally, at one-third of the distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the anterolateral portal, the Dienst portal is created. Thus, these 4 portals form a quadrilateral arrangement through which puncture capsulotomy can be performed5.

Alternatives: Alternative approaches to the hip capsule include interportal and T-capsulotomies, with or without capsular closure1,2,4,6,7,16. Although the most frequently utilized, these approaches transect the iliofemoral ligament and thus may introduce capsuloligamentous instability1,4-7,17.

Rationale: The puncture capsulotomy technique has the advantage of maintaining the integrity of the capsule through the placement of 4 small portals. The technique does not transect the iliofemoral ligament and thus does not introduce capsuloligamentous instability. Furthermore, although good mid-term outcomes have been reported with capsular closure6,13,18, the present technique avoids creating unnecessary injury to the capsule and complications of an unrepaired capsule or, conversely, of plication.

Expected outcomes: Patients who underwent the puncture capsulotomy technique showed significant improvements in multiple functional outcome scores at a mean follow-up of 30.4 months, including the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) (39.6 preoperatively to 76.1 postoperatively), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL) (70.0 to 89.3), HOS Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) (41.8 to 75.7), and modified Harris hip score (mHHS) (60.1 to 84.9). At 2 years postoperatively with respect to iHOT-33, 81.0% of patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference, 62.0% achieved the patient acceptable symptom state, and 58.9% achieved substantial clinical benefit. In addition, mean visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly over the follow-up period (6.3 to 2.2; p < 0.001). Finally, there were zero occurrences of infection, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, dislocation or instability, or femoral neck fracture in patients treated with puncture capsulotomy19,20.

Important tips: Anterolateral portal placement should be performed using the intra-articular fluid distention technique with fluoroscopy to avoid risk of iatrogenic labral damage and distraction-induced neurapraxia. Subsequent portals must then be placed under direct arthroscopic visualization.On establishment of the anterolateral portal, the scope should be switched to the anterior portal to ensure that the anterolateral portal has not been placed through the labrum and to adjust its placement to better access pathology. This portal, as well as all others, may be subsequently modified by adjusting the angle of the cannula, without making a new skin incision.If a cam lesion is located more anteromedially or posterolaterally, an additional accessory portal may be made distal or proximal to the anterolateral portal, respectively, in order to enhance visualization.Intermittent traction is utilized throughout the surgery. No traction is utilized during preparing and draping, suture tensioning and tie-down, and femoroplasty, with minimal traction during acetabuloplasty; these precautions serve to prevent iatrogenic superficial peroneal nerve injury.There can be a steep learning curve for this technique. In particular, greater surgical experience is required to perform adequate femoral osteoplasty for large cam lesions with this approach21.Instrument maneuverability and visualization can be somewhat constrained with this approach.It is more difficult to perform certain procedures with this technique, including segmental and circumferential labral reconstructions, particularly with remote grafts5.

Acronyms and abbreviations: iHOT-33 = International Hip Outcome Tool-33HOS-ADL = Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscaleHOS-SSS = Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific SubscaleAP = anteroposteriorMRA = magnetic resonance arthrogramMRI = magnetic resonance imagingCT = computed tomographyASIS = anterior superior iliac spinemHHS = modified Harris hip score.

髋关节镜手术中的穿刺囊切开技术
背景:在髋关节镜检查中,进入关节囊并进入髋关节的技术有很多1,2。其中,门间切口和T形囊切开术是最常用的方法;然而,这些方法会切断髂股韧带,而髂股韧带通常能抵御前方脱位并稳定伸展3。因此,这些方法可能会导致髂骨韧带不稳定1,4-7 ,并与脱位、术后疼痛、微不稳定、血清肿和异位骨化等并发症有关5,8-12。虽然之前的文献已证明接受囊肿切开术并进行囊肿闭合的患者可获得持久的中期效果6,13,但最好还是避免对髋关节囊造成先天性损伤。因此,我们介绍的穿刺髋关节囊切开术是一种微创手术,在不破坏髂股韧带的情况下保留了髋关节和髋关节囊的生物力学特性,并可通过多个小孔对关节进行适当的观察:麻醉诱导后,患者仰卧在髋关节牵引台上,在填充良好的会阴支柱的支撑下,将非手术腿置于外展45°的位置,并将手术髋关节置于外翻位置,与支柱相抵14。使用生理盐水进行关节内液体膨胀,使股骨头下移约9毫米,降低先天性神经损伤的风险15。然后,在透视引导下,在股骨大转子前方 1 厘米和上方 1 厘米处创建一个前外侧入口,角度约为 15° 至 20°。其次,通过关节镜观察,在髂前上棘垂直线与前外侧入口水平线交点的远端和外侧各 1 厘米处创建前入口。第三,在前门和前外侧门之间等距的远端创建中前门。最后,在髂前上棘与前外侧门户之间距离的三分之一处,创建 Dienst 门户。这样,这 4 个入口就形成了一个四边形,可以通过它们进行穿刺髋关节囊切开术5:髋关节囊的替代方法包括门间和 T 型囊切开术,可进行或不进行囊闭合1,2,4,6,7,16。理由:穿刺髋关节囊切开术的优点是通过放置 4 个小孔保持髋关节囊的完整性。该技术不会切断髂股韧带,因此不会造成囊韧带不稳定。此外,尽管有报道称囊袋闭合术的中期疗效良好6、13、18,但本技术避免了对囊袋造成不必要的损伤,也避免了未修复囊袋或反之,植入囊袋的并发症:预期结果:接受穿刺囊切开术的患者在平均 30.4 个月的随访中,多项功能结果评分均有显著改善,包括国际髋关节结果工具(iHOT-33)(39.6到术后76.1)、髋关节结果评分-日常生活活动分量表(HOS-ADL)(70.0到89.3)、HOS运动专项分量表(HOS-SSS)(41.8到75.7)和改良哈里斯髋关节评分(mHHS)(60.1到84.9)。术后 2 年,81.0% 的患者达到了 iHOT-33 的最小临床重要性差异,62.0% 的患者达到了患者可接受的症状状态,58.9% 的患者获得了实质性临床获益。此外,平均视觉模拟量表疼痛评分在随访期间也有明显改善(从 6.3 分降至 2.2 分;P < 0.001)。最后,在接受穿刺囊切开术治疗的患者中,感染、股骨头坏死、脱位或不稳定或股骨颈骨折的发生率为零19,20:重要提示:应在透视下使用关节腔内液体膨胀技术进行前外侧入路置入,以避免唇缘先天性损伤和牵拉引起的神经麻痹风险。随后的入口必须在关节镜直视下置入。在建立前外侧入口后,应将显微镜切换到前方入口,以确保前外侧入口没有穿过唇缘,并调整其位置以更好地进入病变部位。如果凸轮病变位于前内侧或后外侧,可分别在前外侧入口的远端或近端再做一个辅助入口,以增强可视性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信