Severe (>100 Degrees) Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis - A Comparison of Surgical Approaches.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1177/21925682241264768
Lauren E Stone, Peter O Newton, Anthony A Catanzano, Hiroki Oba, Lawrence G Lenke, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, Michael P Kelly, Munish C Gupta
{"title":"Severe (>100 Degrees) Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis - A Comparison of Surgical Approaches.","authors":"Lauren E Stone, Peter O Newton, Anthony A Catanzano, Hiroki Oba, Lawrence G Lenke, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, Michael P Kelly, Munish C Gupta","doi":"10.1177/21925682241264768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective.ObjectiveSevere curves >100° in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are rare and require careful operative planning. The aim of this study was to assess baseline, perioperative, and 2-year differences between anterior release with posterior instrumentation (AP), posterior instrumentation with posterior column osteotomies (P), and posterior instrumentation with 3-column vertebral osteotomies (VCR).MethodsTwo scoliosis datasets were queried for primary cases of severe thoracic AIS (≥100°) with 2-year follow-up. Pre- and 2-year postoperative radiographic measures (2D and estimated 3D kyphosis), clinical measurements, and SRS-22 outcomes were compared between three approaches.ResultsSixty-one patients were included: 16 AP (26%), 38 P (62%), 7 VCR (11%). Average age was 14.4 ± 2.0 years; 75.4% were female. Preoperative thoracic curve magnitude (AP: 112°, P: 115°, VCR: 126°, <i>P</i> = 0.09) and T5-T12 kyphosis (AP: 38°, P: 59°, VCR: 70°, <i>P</i> = 0.057) were similar between groups. Estimated 3D kyphosis was less in AP vs P (-12° vs 4°, <i>P</i> = 0.016). Main thoracic curves corrected to 36° in AP vs 49° and 48° for P and VCR, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Change in estimated 3D kyphosis was greater in AP vs P and VCR (34° vs 13°, <i>P</i> = 0.009; 34° vs 7°, <i>P</i> = 0.046). One incomplete spinal cord injury had residual deficits (P; 1/61, 1.6%). All SRS-22 domains improved postoperatively.ConclusionAll approaches obtained satisfactory coronal and sagittal correction, but AP had smaller residual coronal deformity and greater kyphosis restoration than the other approaches. This information may help inform the decision of whether to include an anterior release for large thoracic AIS curves.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1773-1782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241264768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective.ObjectiveSevere curves >100° in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are rare and require careful operative planning. The aim of this study was to assess baseline, perioperative, and 2-year differences between anterior release with posterior instrumentation (AP), posterior instrumentation with posterior column osteotomies (P), and posterior instrumentation with 3-column vertebral osteotomies (VCR).MethodsTwo scoliosis datasets were queried for primary cases of severe thoracic AIS (≥100°) with 2-year follow-up. Pre- and 2-year postoperative radiographic measures (2D and estimated 3D kyphosis), clinical measurements, and SRS-22 outcomes were compared between three approaches.ResultsSixty-one patients were included: 16 AP (26%), 38 P (62%), 7 VCR (11%). Average age was 14.4 ± 2.0 years; 75.4% were female. Preoperative thoracic curve magnitude (AP: 112°, P: 115°, VCR: 126°, P = 0.09) and T5-T12 kyphosis (AP: 38°, P: 59°, VCR: 70°, P = 0.057) were similar between groups. Estimated 3D kyphosis was less in AP vs P (-12° vs 4°, P = 0.016). Main thoracic curves corrected to 36° in AP vs 49° and 48° for P and VCR, respectively (P = 0.02). Change in estimated 3D kyphosis was greater in AP vs P and VCR (34° vs 13°, P = 0.009; 34° vs 7°, P = 0.046). One incomplete spinal cord injury had residual deficits (P; 1/61, 1.6%). All SRS-22 domains improved postoperatively.ConclusionAll approaches obtained satisfactory coronal and sagittal correction, but AP had smaller residual coronal deformity and greater kyphosis restoration than the other approaches. This information may help inform the decision of whether to include an anterior release for large thoracic AIS curves.

严重(>100 度)胸廓青少年特发性脊柱侧凸--手术方法比较。
研究设计回顾性研究:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)中大于 100° 的严重弯曲非常罕见,需要仔细制定手术计划。本研究旨在评估前路松解联合后路器械植入术(AP)、后路器械植入联合后柱截骨术(P)和后路器械植入联合三柱椎体截骨术(VCR)之间的基线、围手术期和两年差异:方法:对两个脊柱侧弯数据集进行了查询,以了解随访 2 年的重度胸椎 AIS(≥100°)的主要病例。比较了三种方法的术前和术后 2 年的影像学测量(二维和估计三维驼背)、临床测量和 SRS-22 结果:结果:共纳入 61 名患者:16例AP(26%)、38例P(62%)、7例VCR(11%)。平均年龄为(14.4 ± 2.0)岁;75.4%为女性。术前胸椎曲线幅度(AP:112°,P:115°,VCR:126°,P = 0.09)和T5-T12椎体后凸(AP:38°,P:59°,VCR:70°,P = 0.057)在各组之间相似。AP组与P组相比,估计的三维后凸较小(-12° vs 4°,P = 0.016)。AP组的主要胸椎曲线矫正为36°,而P组和VCR组分别为49°和48°(P = 0.02)。AP与P和VCR相比,估计三维后凸的变化更大(34° vs 13°,P = 0.009;34° vs 7°,P = 0.046)。一名不完全脊髓损伤患者有残余功能障碍(P;1/61,1.6%)。所有SRS-22指标在术后均有所改善:结论:所有方法都能获得令人满意的冠状面和矢状面矫正效果,但与其他方法相比,AP法的残余冠状面畸形更小,駝背恢复程度更高。这些信息可能有助于决定是否对大胸廓AIS曲线进行前路松解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信