Risk analysis index predicts mortality and non-home discharge following posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis of 429,380 patients (2019-2020).

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08373-9
Michael M Covell, Kranti C Rumalla, Shubhang Bhalla, Christian A Bowers
{"title":"Risk analysis index predicts mortality and non-home discharge following posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis of 429,380 patients (2019-2020).","authors":"Michael M Covell, Kranti C Rumalla, Shubhang Bhalla, Christian A Bowers","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08373-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes following spine surgery. The ability of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) to predict adverse outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has not been studied extensively and may improve preoperative risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing PLIF were queried from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2019-2020). The relationship between RAI-measured preoperative frailty and primary outcomes (mortality, non-home discharge (NHD)) and secondary outcomes (extended length of stay (eLOS), complication rates) was assessed via multivariate analyses. The discriminatory accuracy of the RAI for primary outcomes was measured in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429,380 PLIF patients (mean age = 61y) were identified, with frailty cohorts stratified by standard RAI convention: 0-20 \"robust\" (R)(38.3%), 21-30 \"normal\" (N)(54.3%), 31-40 \"frail\" (F)(6.1%) and 41+ \"very frail\" (VF)(1.3%). The incidence of primary and secondary outcomes increased as frailty thresholds increased: mortality (R 0.1%, N 0.1%, F 0.4%, VF 1.3%; p < 0.001), NHD (R 6.5%, N 18.1%, F 36.9%, VF 42.0%; p < 0.001), eLOS (R 18.0%, N 21.9%, F 31.6%, VF 43.8%; p < 0.001) and complication rates (R 6.6%, N 8.8%, F 11.1%, VF 12.2%; p < 0.001). The RAI demonstrated acceptable discrimination for NHD (C-statistic: 0.706) and mortality (C-statistic: 0.676) in AUROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing RAI-measured frailty is significantly associated with increased NHD, eLOS, complication rates, and mortality following PLIF. The RAI demonstrates acceptable discrimination for predicting NHD and mortality, and may be used to improve frailty-based risk assessment for spine surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08373-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes following spine surgery. The ability of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) to predict adverse outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has not been studied extensively and may improve preoperative risk stratification.

Methods: Patients undergoing PLIF were queried from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2019-2020). The relationship between RAI-measured preoperative frailty and primary outcomes (mortality, non-home discharge (NHD)) and secondary outcomes (extended length of stay (eLOS), complication rates) was assessed via multivariate analyses. The discriminatory accuracy of the RAI for primary outcomes was measured in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis.

Results: A total of 429,380 PLIF patients (mean age = 61y) were identified, with frailty cohorts stratified by standard RAI convention: 0-20 "robust" (R)(38.3%), 21-30 "normal" (N)(54.3%), 31-40 "frail" (F)(6.1%) and 41+ "very frail" (VF)(1.3%). The incidence of primary and secondary outcomes increased as frailty thresholds increased: mortality (R 0.1%, N 0.1%, F 0.4%, VF 1.3%; p < 0.001), NHD (R 6.5%, N 18.1%, F 36.9%, VF 42.0%; p < 0.001), eLOS (R 18.0%, N 21.9%, F 31.6%, VF 43.8%; p < 0.001) and complication rates (R 6.6%, N 8.8%, F 11.1%, VF 12.2%; p < 0.001). The RAI demonstrated acceptable discrimination for NHD (C-statistic: 0.706) and mortality (C-statistic: 0.676) in AUROC curve analysis.

Conclusion: Increasing RAI-measured frailty is significantly associated with increased NHD, eLOS, complication rates, and mortality following PLIF. The RAI demonstrates acceptable discrimination for predicting NHD and mortality, and may be used to improve frailty-based risk assessment for spine surgeons.

风险分析指数可预测后路腰椎椎间融合术后的死亡率和非居家出院情况:对 429,380 名患者的全国住院样本分析(2019-2020 年)。
目的:虚弱是脊柱手术后不良预后的独立风险因素。风险分析指数(RAI)预测后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)术后不良预后的能力尚未得到广泛研究,该指数可改善术前风险分层:从全国住院患者样本(NIS)(2019-2020年)中查询了接受PLIF手术的患者。通过多变量分析评估了 RAI 测定的术前虚弱程度与主要结局(死亡率、非居家出院(NHD))和次要结局(延长住院时间(eLOS)、并发症发生率)之间的关系。RAI 对主要结果的判别准确性通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分析进行测量:结果:共确定了 429,380 名 PLIF 患者(平均年龄 = 61 岁),按照标准 RAI 惯例对虚弱队列进行了分层:0-20岁为 "强壮"(R)(38.3%),21-30岁为 "正常"(N)(54.3%),31-40岁为 "虚弱"(F)(6.1%),41岁以上为 "非常虚弱"(VF)(1.3%)。随着虚弱阈值的增加,主要和次要结果的发生率也随之增加:死亡率(R 0.1%,N 0.1%,F 0.4%,VF 1.3%;P 结论:RAI 测定的虚弱程度的增加与 PLIF 术后 NHD、eLOS、并发症发生率和死亡率的增加密切相关。RAI 在预测 NHD 和死亡率方面具有可接受的辨别能力,可用于改善脊柱外科医生基于虚弱程度的风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信