Minority stress and romantic relationship functioning among young sexual minority women.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1037/fam0001250
Sarah W Whitton, Elissa L Sarno, Michael E Newcomb
{"title":"Minority stress and romantic relationship functioning among young sexual minority women.","authors":"Sarah W Whitton, Elissa L Sarno, Michael E Newcomb","doi":"10.1037/fam0001250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing research suggests that minority stress adversely affects relationship functioning among same-gender couples. However, studies have predominantly focused on concurrent, between-persons associations and neglected the relationships sexual minority people have with partners of other genders. We used multiwave longitudinal data from 200 young sexual minority women in relationships with cisgender men, cisgender women, and transgender or nonbinary individuals to assess between- and within-person associations between minority stress and relationship functioning and to test for differences in these associations by partner gender. Participants reported on minority stressors (couple marginalization; microaggressions; internalized heterosexism) and relationship functioning (quality; destructive conflict) from the same partnership at 3-7 assessments (<i>M</i> = 4.44), collected at 6-month intervals. Multilevel models assessing each minority stressor separately revealed between-person associations of each stressor with worse relationship quality and conflict; however, only couple marginalization showed within-person associations with relationship functioning. In multilevel models including all three minority stressors, couple marginalization showed unique within- and between-persons associations with worse relationship functioning; microaggressions were only uniquely associated with couple conflict at the between-persons level. Moderation analyses revealed a negative between-persons association of microaggressions with relationship quality only for participants with cisgender male partners, and a <i>positive</i> within-person association of microaggressions with relationship quality only for those with cisgender female partners. Several associations were weaker for participants with transgender or nonbinary compared to cisgender partners. Findings highlight the importance of couple-level minority stress and partner gender in understanding how sexual minority stress affects relationship functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing research suggests that minority stress adversely affects relationship functioning among same-gender couples. However, studies have predominantly focused on concurrent, between-persons associations and neglected the relationships sexual minority people have with partners of other genders. We used multiwave longitudinal data from 200 young sexual minority women in relationships with cisgender men, cisgender women, and transgender or nonbinary individuals to assess between- and within-person associations between minority stress and relationship functioning and to test for differences in these associations by partner gender. Participants reported on minority stressors (couple marginalization; microaggressions; internalized heterosexism) and relationship functioning (quality; destructive conflict) from the same partnership at 3-7 assessments (M = 4.44), collected at 6-month intervals. Multilevel models assessing each minority stressor separately revealed between-person associations of each stressor with worse relationship quality and conflict; however, only couple marginalization showed within-person associations with relationship functioning. In multilevel models including all three minority stressors, couple marginalization showed unique within- and between-persons associations with worse relationship functioning; microaggressions were only uniquely associated with couple conflict at the between-persons level. Moderation analyses revealed a negative between-persons association of microaggressions with relationship quality only for participants with cisgender male partners, and a positive within-person association of microaggressions with relationship quality only for those with cisgender female partners. Several associations were weaker for participants with transgender or nonbinary compared to cisgender partners. Findings highlight the importance of couple-level minority stress and partner gender in understanding how sexual minority stress affects relationship functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

性少数群体年轻女性的少数群体压力和恋爱关系功能。
越来越多的研究表明,少数群体的压力会对同性配偶之间的关系功能产生不利影响。然而,这些研究主要关注的是并发的、人与人之间的关系,而忽视了性少数群体与其他性别伴侣的关系。我们使用了 200 名年轻的性少数群体女性与同性别的男性、同性别的女性、跨性别或非二元性个体之间关系的多波纵向数据,来评估少数群体压力与关系功能之间的人际关系和人内关系,并检验这些关系在伴侣性别上的差异。参与者在 3-7 次评估(M = 4.44)中报告了同一伴侣关系中的少数群体压力源(夫妻边缘化;微观诽谤;内化异性恋主义)和关系功能(质量;破坏性冲突),每隔 6 个月收集一次。分别评估每种少数群体压力源的多层次模型显示,每种压力源都与关系质量和冲突的恶化存在人际关系;但是,只有夫妻边缘化与关系功能存在人际关系。在包含所有三种少数群体压力源的多层次模型中,夫妻边缘化与关系功能变差的人内和人际关系有独特的关联;微小辱骂仅在人际关系层面与夫妻冲突有独特的关联。调节分析显示,只有与同性别的男性伴侣在人与人之间的微观诽谤与关系质量存在负相关,只有与同性别的女性伴侣在人与人之间的微观诽谤与关系质量存在正相关。与双性恋伴侣相比,变性或非二元性别伴侣的参与者的几种关联较弱。研究结果凸显了夫妻层面的少数群体压力和伴侣性别在理解性少数群体压力如何影响关系功能方面的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信