Traditional Nostril Yoga Breathing Practices and Oxygen Consumption: A Randomized, Cross-over Study.

IF 1.1 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
International Journal of Yoga Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_248_23
Alok Singh, Sachin Kumar Sharma, Shirley Telles, Acharya Balkrishna
{"title":"Traditional Nostril Yoga Breathing Practices and Oxygen Consumption: A Randomized, Cross-over Study.","authors":"Alok Singh, Sachin Kumar Sharma, Shirley Telles, Acharya Balkrishna","doi":"10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_248_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional yoga texts describe \"cross nostril breathing,\" with inhalation and exhalation through different nostrils. Previous research reported no clear differences in oxygen consumption during uninostril breathing (i.e., inhalation and exhalation through the same nostril), hence not supporting right and left uninostril breathing as activating or relaxing, respectively, with no research on oxygen consumed in \"cross nostril breathing.\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oxygen consumed during \"cross nostril breathing\" was measured in healthy participants (<i>n</i> = 47, males, 26.3 ± 6.4 years). Five sessions (viz., right nostril inspiration yoga breathing [RNIYB], left nostril inspiration yoga breathing [LNIYB], alternate nostril yoga breathing [ANYB], breath awareness (BAW), and quiet rest (QR) were conducted on separate days in random order. Sessions were 33 min in duration with pre, during, and post states.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volume of oxygen consumed (VO<sub>2</sub>) and carbon dioxide eliminated (VCO<sub>2</sub>) increased during RNIYB (9.60% in VO<sub>2</sub> and 23.52% in VCO<sub>2</sub>), LNIYB (9.42% in VO<sub>2</sub> and 21.20% in VCO<sub>2</sub>) and ANYB (10.25% in VO<sub>2</sub> and 22.72% in VCO<sub>2</sub>) with no significant change in BAW and QR. Diastolic blood pressure decreased during BAW and QR and after all five sessions (<i>P</i> < 0.05; in all cases). All comparisons were with the respective preceding state.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the three yoga breathing practices, the volume of oxygen consumed increased irrespective of the nostril breathed through, possibly associated with (i) conscious regulation of the breath; (ii) attention directed to the breath, and (iii) \"respiration-locked cortical activation.\" Restriction of the study to males reduces the generalizability of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14436,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Yoga","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Yoga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_248_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional yoga texts describe "cross nostril breathing," with inhalation and exhalation through different nostrils. Previous research reported no clear differences in oxygen consumption during uninostril breathing (i.e., inhalation and exhalation through the same nostril), hence not supporting right and left uninostril breathing as activating or relaxing, respectively, with no research on oxygen consumed in "cross nostril breathing."

Methods: Oxygen consumed during "cross nostril breathing" was measured in healthy participants (n = 47, males, 26.3 ± 6.4 years). Five sessions (viz., right nostril inspiration yoga breathing [RNIYB], left nostril inspiration yoga breathing [LNIYB], alternate nostril yoga breathing [ANYB], breath awareness (BAW), and quiet rest (QR) were conducted on separate days in random order. Sessions were 33 min in duration with pre, during, and post states.

Results: Volume of oxygen consumed (VO2) and carbon dioxide eliminated (VCO2) increased during RNIYB (9.60% in VO2 and 23.52% in VCO2), LNIYB (9.42% in VO2 and 21.20% in VCO2) and ANYB (10.25% in VO2 and 22.72% in VCO2) with no significant change in BAW and QR. Diastolic blood pressure decreased during BAW and QR and after all five sessions (P < 0.05; in all cases). All comparisons were with the respective preceding state.

Conclusion: During the three yoga breathing practices, the volume of oxygen consumed increased irrespective of the nostril breathed through, possibly associated with (i) conscious regulation of the breath; (ii) attention directed to the breath, and (iii) "respiration-locked cortical activation." Restriction of the study to males reduces the generalizability of the findings.

传统鼻孔瑜伽呼吸法与耗氧量:随机交叉研究。
背景介绍传统瑜伽经文描述了 "跨鼻孔呼吸",即通过不同鼻孔吸气和呼气。之前的研究报告显示,在非鼻孔呼吸(即通过同一鼻孔吸气和呼气)时,氧气消耗量没有明显差异,因此不支持左右非鼻孔呼吸分别作为激活或放松呼吸,也没有关于 "交叉鼻孔呼吸 "时氧气消耗量的研究:测量健康参与者(n = 47,男性,26.3 ± 6.4 岁)在 "跨鼻孔呼吸 "时消耗的氧气。五次训练(即右鼻孔吸气瑜珈呼吸[RNIYB]、左鼻孔吸气瑜珈呼吸[LNIYB]、交替鼻孔瑜珈呼吸[ANYB]、呼吸意识(BAW)和安静休息(QR))在不同的日子以随机顺序进行。每节课持续 33 分钟,包括课前、课中和课后状态:结果:在 RNIYB(VO2 增加了 9.60%,VCO2 增加了 23.52%)、LNIYB(VO2 增加了 9.42%,VCO2 增加了 21.20%)和 ANYB(VO2 增加了 10.25%,VCO2 增加了 22.72%)期间,耗氧量(VO2)和二氧化碳排出量(VCO2)均有所增加,而在 BAW 和 QR 期间则无明显变化。在 BAW 和 QR 期间以及所有五个疗程后,舒张压均有所下降(P < 0.05;在所有情况下)。所有比较均与之前的状态相同:结论:在三种瑜伽呼吸练习中,无论用哪个鼻孔呼吸,消耗的氧气量都会增加,这可能与(i)有意识地调节呼吸;(ii)注意力集中在呼吸上;以及(iii)"呼吸锁定皮质激活 "有关。这项研究仅限于男性,这降低了研究结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Yoga
International Journal of Yoga INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信