Developing an eDNA approach for wetland biomonitoring: Insights on technical and conventional approaches

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1002/edn3.574
Starsha Bird, Paul Dutton, Shaun Wilkinson, Josh Smith, Ian Duggan, Angela McGaughran
{"title":"Developing an eDNA approach for wetland biomonitoring: Insights on technical and conventional approaches","authors":"Starsha Bird,&nbsp;Paul Dutton,&nbsp;Shaun Wilkinson,&nbsp;Josh Smith,&nbsp;Ian Duggan,&nbsp;Angela McGaughran","doi":"10.1002/edn3.574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wetlands are ecologically and culturally significant ecosystems that are experiencing biodiversity declines globally. Biomonitoring techniques that use environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect and monitor biodiversity are well established in lake, riverine, and marine ecosystems. However, their use in wetlands requires further development due to the presence of sediments that block eDNA filters to limit water filtration, alongside a lack of standardized methodology. In this study, we examined eDNA dynamics to understand spatiotemporal biodiversity patterns in an Aotearoa New Zealand wetland and to optimize their application to wetland-specific challenges. We sampled four sites across Opuatia Wetland at three time points during an austral spring. We conducted conventional taxonomic surveys, tested three different filter sizes (1.2 μm, 5 μm, and semi-quantitative dacron filters), and assessed our ability to detect foreign DNA (from kea; <i>Nestor notabilis</i>) at different time points and distances post-release. We found significant differences in DNA sequence composition across time and space, and when using different sized filters. eDNA data generally complemented (versus replaced) conventional survey and identification methods, with certain species only detected by one method or the other. Taxonomic resolution of conventional sampling and identification methods often exceeded that of eDNA. Foreign DNA was detectable 10 m from its release point for up to 1 week post-release. Our results provide new considerations for future eDNA research in wetland environments, where rapid biomonitoring techniques are needed to support conservation and preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wetlands are ecologically and culturally significant ecosystems that are experiencing biodiversity declines globally. Biomonitoring techniques that use environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect and monitor biodiversity are well established in lake, riverine, and marine ecosystems. However, their use in wetlands requires further development due to the presence of sediments that block eDNA filters to limit water filtration, alongside a lack of standardized methodology. In this study, we examined eDNA dynamics to understand spatiotemporal biodiversity patterns in an Aotearoa New Zealand wetland and to optimize their application to wetland-specific challenges. We sampled four sites across Opuatia Wetland at three time points during an austral spring. We conducted conventional taxonomic surveys, tested three different filter sizes (1.2 μm, 5 μm, and semi-quantitative dacron filters), and assessed our ability to detect foreign DNA (from kea; Nestor notabilis) at different time points and distances post-release. We found significant differences in DNA sequence composition across time and space, and when using different sized filters. eDNA data generally complemented (versus replaced) conventional survey and identification methods, with certain species only detected by one method or the other. Taxonomic resolution of conventional sampling and identification methods often exceeded that of eDNA. Foreign DNA was detectable 10 m from its release point for up to 1 week post-release. Our results provide new considerations for future eDNA research in wetland environments, where rapid biomonitoring techniques are needed to support conservation and preservation.

Abstract Image

开发用于湿地生物监测的 eDNA 方法:对技术和传统方法的见解
湿地是具有重要生态和文化意义的生态系统,但其生物多样性正在全球范围内不断减少。利用环境 DNA(eDNA)检测和监测生物多样性的生物监测技术已在湖泊、河流和海洋生态系统中得到广泛应用。然而,由于沉积物的存在会阻挡 eDNA 过滤器,从而限制水的过滤,再加上缺乏标准化的方法,在湿地中使用这些技术还需要进一步发展。在本研究中,我们研究了 eDNA 的动态,以了解新西兰奥特亚罗瓦湿地的时空生物多样性模式,并优化其在湿地特定挑战中的应用。我们在澳大利亚春季的三个时间点对奥普阿蒂亚湿地的四个地点进行了采样。我们进行了传统的分类调查,测试了三种不同尺寸的过滤器(1.2 μm、5 μm 和半定量达克龙过滤器),并评估了我们在不同时间点和释放后不同距离检测外来 DNA(来自 kea;Nestor notabilis)的能力。我们发现,不同时间、不同空间以及使用不同尺寸的过滤器时,DNA 序列组成存在明显差异。eDNA 数据通常是对传统调查和鉴定方法的补充(而非替代),某些物种只能通过其中一种方法检测到。传统取样和鉴定方法的分类分辨率往往超过 eDNA。外来 DNA 在释放后的 1 周内都能在距离释放点 10 米的地方被检测到。我们的研究结果为今后在湿地环境中开展 eDNA 研究提供了新的思路,在湿地环境中需要快速的生物监测技术来支持保护和保存工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信