GIRFT and Measuring Outcomes in MCNs: endodontics in 646 teeth treated in Tier 2 (Primary Care) and Tier 3 (Secondary Care) settings in England.

Shiyana Eliyas, Kewal Shah, Nalin Dhamecha, Tapasya Jayaram, Aaron Yusuf, Vishal Jasani, Nirvair Kaur
{"title":"GIRFT and Measuring Outcomes in MCNs: endodontics in 646 teeth treated in Tier 2 (Primary Care) and Tier 3 (Secondary Care) settings in England.","authors":"Shiyana Eliyas, Kewal Shah, Nalin Dhamecha, Tapasya Jayaram, Aaron Yusuf, Vishal Jasani, Nirvair Kaur","doi":"10.1177/20501684241230799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper aims to assess the complexity, quality and outcome of endodontic treatment provided in Managed Clinical Networks (MCNs) in England to understand if we are \"getting it right first time\" (GIRFT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a convenient sample of endodontic treatments provided between May 2011 and April 2017, the complexity of teeth treated, the quality of treatment procedure, the radiographic appearance of root fillings, as well as clinical and radiographic healing were retrospectively assessed using records taken as part of treatment. Trained, calibrated examiners independently scored radiographs using previously published scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>646 teeth were followed up for 24.7 months (standard deviation [SD] 17.08). The average age of those patients treated was 46.7 years (SD 15.38) with 48.3% being male. Of teeth treated, 70.4% were of complexity level 3. 88.2% of teeth were asymptomatic, and 80% demonstrated complete radiographic healing. Procedural errors inhibited achieving correct working length and taper, with more voids within root canal fillings. When patency filing was reported as being carried out, complete radiographic healing was more likely.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible to collate outcome data in the NHS system, especially if there is provision for ongoing follow up and time allocated for collection of data. Endodontic treatment provided within primary and secondary care settings are of high quality, with outcomes being better with single operators carrying out high volumes of endodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":519951,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501684241230799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This paper aims to assess the complexity, quality and outcome of endodontic treatment provided in Managed Clinical Networks (MCNs) in England to understand if we are "getting it right first time" (GIRFT).

Methods: In a convenient sample of endodontic treatments provided between May 2011 and April 2017, the complexity of teeth treated, the quality of treatment procedure, the radiographic appearance of root fillings, as well as clinical and radiographic healing were retrospectively assessed using records taken as part of treatment. Trained, calibrated examiners independently scored radiographs using previously published scoring systems.

Results: 646 teeth were followed up for 24.7 months (standard deviation [SD] 17.08). The average age of those patients treated was 46.7 years (SD 15.38) with 48.3% being male. Of teeth treated, 70.4% were of complexity level 3. 88.2% of teeth were asymptomatic, and 80% demonstrated complete radiographic healing. Procedural errors inhibited achieving correct working length and taper, with more voids within root canal fillings. When patency filing was reported as being carried out, complete radiographic healing was more likely.

Conclusions: It is possible to collate outcome data in the NHS system, especially if there is provision for ongoing follow up and time allocated for collection of data. Endodontic treatment provided within primary and secondary care settings are of high quality, with outcomes being better with single operators carrying out high volumes of endodontic treatment.

GIRFT 和 MCN 中的成果衡量:英格兰二级(初级医疗)和三级(二级医疗)医疗机构中 646 颗牙齿的牙髓治疗。
目的:本文旨在评估英格兰托管临床网络(MCN)提供的牙髓治疗的复杂性、质量和结果,以了解我们是否 "第一次就做对了"(GIRFT):在 2011 年 5 月至 2017 年 4 月期间提供的牙髓治疗的方便样本中,使用治疗过程中的记录对所治疗牙齿的复杂性、治疗过程的质量、根充填的放射学外观以及临床和放射学愈合情况进行了回顾性评估。训练有素、经过校准的检查人员使用之前公布的评分系统对射线照片进行独立评分:对 646 颗牙齿进行了 24.7 个月的随访(标准差 [SD] 17.08)。接受治疗的患者平均年龄为 46.7 岁(标准差 15.38),48.3% 为男性。在接受治疗的牙齿中,70.4%的牙齿复杂程度为 3 级。88.2%的牙齿无症状,80%的牙齿在X光片上显示完全愈合。程序错误阻碍了实现正确的工作长度和锥度,根管填充物中的空隙较多。据报告,如果进行了通畅锉,则更有可能获得完全的X光片愈合:在国家医疗服务系统中整理结果数据是可行的,特别是如果有持续的随访和用于收集数据的时间。在初级和二级医疗机构中提供的牙髓治疗都是高质量的,而由单一操作者进行大量牙髓治疗的结果会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信