Treatment of common femoral artery steno-occlusive disease: a comprehensive review of anatomical and hemodynamic considerations.

Adam T Geale, Hany Zayed, Pablo Lamata, Jordi Alastruey, Rachel E Clough
{"title":"Treatment of common femoral artery steno-occlusive disease: a comprehensive review of anatomical and hemodynamic considerations.","authors":"Adam T Geale, Hany Zayed, Pablo Lamata, Jordi Alastruey, Rachel E Clough","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13073-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open surgical repair, often in the form of endarterectomy, is still the gold standard for steno-occlusive disease in the common femoral artery, despite the success of lower-risk endovascular alternatives in other peripheral arterial regions. Stenting in the common femoral artery is not widely adopted due to the proximity of the artery to the mobile hip joint, and the perceived risk this has on the stent structure due to kinking. The purpose of this review was to assess how hip movement contributes to the anatomical and biomechanical challenges proposed in the common femoral artery, and how these challenges impact the hemodynamics with both open surgical and endovascular stent treatments. The findings demonstrated that the common femoral artery is a fixed arterial segment which does not bend or twist as previously perceived. However, high degrees of bending and twisting are evident in the vessels directly proximal and distal to the common femoral artery. Mechanical testing suggests that the latest generation braided Nitinol stents could be well-suited to these challenges. Both endarterectomy and stenting provide good hemodynamic results regarding limb perfusion. However, other hemodynamic parameters, such as wall shear stress, may not be optimized with either modality, increasing the risk of chronic restenosis. As a high proportion of common femoral artery disease extends into the adjacent arterial segments, further research is warranted to ascertain the optimum hemodynamic stent configuration, as a lower-risk alternative to open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"313-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13073-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open surgical repair, often in the form of endarterectomy, is still the gold standard for steno-occlusive disease in the common femoral artery, despite the success of lower-risk endovascular alternatives in other peripheral arterial regions. Stenting in the common femoral artery is not widely adopted due to the proximity of the artery to the mobile hip joint, and the perceived risk this has on the stent structure due to kinking. The purpose of this review was to assess how hip movement contributes to the anatomical and biomechanical challenges proposed in the common femoral artery, and how these challenges impact the hemodynamics with both open surgical and endovascular stent treatments. The findings demonstrated that the common femoral artery is a fixed arterial segment which does not bend or twist as previously perceived. However, high degrees of bending and twisting are evident in the vessels directly proximal and distal to the common femoral artery. Mechanical testing suggests that the latest generation braided Nitinol stents could be well-suited to these challenges. Both endarterectomy and stenting provide good hemodynamic results regarding limb perfusion. However, other hemodynamic parameters, such as wall shear stress, may not be optimized with either modality, increasing the risk of chronic restenosis. As a high proportion of common femoral artery disease extends into the adjacent arterial segments, further research is warranted to ascertain the optimum hemodynamic stent configuration, as a lower-risk alternative to open surgery.

股总动脉狭窄闭塞症的治疗:解剖学和血液动力学考虑因素的全面回顾。
尽管风险较低的血管内治疗方法在其他外周动脉区域取得了成功,但股总动脉狭窄闭塞性疾病的金标准仍然是开放手术修复(通常是动脉内膜切除术)。股总动脉支架置入术并未被广泛采用,原因是股总动脉靠近活动的髋关节,而且支架结构可能因扭结而面临风险。本综述的目的是评估髋关节运动如何导致股总动脉面临解剖和生物力学挑战,以及这些挑战如何影响开放手术和血管内支架治疗的血流动力学。研究结果表明,股总动脉是一个固定的动脉节段,不会像以前认为的那样弯曲或扭转。然而,股总动脉直接近端和远端的血管明显存在高度弯曲和扭曲。机械测试表明,最新一代的编织镍钛诺支架可以很好地应对这些挑战。在肢体灌注方面,动脉内膜切除术和支架植入术都能提供良好的血液动力学效果。然而,其他血流动力学参数,如壁剪应力,可能无法通过这两种方式达到最佳效果,从而增加了慢性再狭窄的风险。由于股总动脉疾病有很大一部分会延伸到邻近的动脉段,因此有必要进一步研究确定最佳的血流动力学支架配置,作为开放手术的低风险替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信