Mindfulness-Based Group Medical Visits: Strategies to Improve Equitable Access and Inclusion for Diverse Patients in Cancer Treatment.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241263486
Kavita K Mishra, Ivan C Leung, Maria T Chao, Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Christine Pollak, Anand Dhruva, Wendy Hartogensis, Michael Lister, Stephanie W Cheng, Chloe E Atreya
{"title":"Mindfulness-Based Group Medical Visits: Strategies to Improve Equitable Access and Inclusion for Diverse Patients in Cancer Treatment.","authors":"Kavita K Mishra, Ivan C Leung, Maria T Chao, Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Christine Pollak, Anand Dhruva, Wendy Hartogensis, Michael Lister, Stephanie W Cheng, Chloe E Atreya","doi":"10.1177/27536130241263486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are supported by clinical practice guidelines as effective non-pharmacologic interventions for common symptoms experienced by cancer patients, including anxiety, depression, and fatigue. However, the evidence predominately derives from White breast cancer survivors. Racial and ethnic minority patients have less access to integrative oncology care and worse cancer outcomes. To address these gaps, we designed and piloted a series of mindfulness-based group medical visits (MB-GMVs), embedded into comprehensive cancer care, for racially and ethnically diverse patients in cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a quality improvement project, we launched a telehealth MB-GMV series for patients undergoing cancer treatment, delivered as four weekly 2-hour visits billable to insurance. Content was concordant with evidence-based guidelines and established MBIs and adapted to improve cultural relevance and fit (eg, access-centered, trauma-informed, with inclusive communication practices). Program structure was adapted to address barriers to participation, with ≥50% slots per series reserved for racial and ethnic minority patients. Intake surveys incorporated a demographic questionnaire and symptom assessments. Evaluations were sent following the visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our first ten cohorts (n = 78), 80% of referred patients enrolled. Participants were: 22% Asian, 14% Black, 17% Latino, 45% non-Latino White; 65% female; with a median age of 54 years (range 27-79); and 80% had metastatic cancer. Common baseline symptoms included lack of energy, difficulty sleeping, and worrying. Most patients (90%) attended ≥3 visits. On final evaluations, 87% patients rated the series as \"excellent\"; 81% \"strongly agreed\" that they liked the GMV format; and 92% would \"definitely\" recommend the series to others. Qualitative themes included empowerment and connectedness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telehealth GMVs are a feasible, acceptable, and financially sustainable model for increasing access to MBIs. Diverse patients in active cancer treatment were able to participate and reported high levels of satisfaction with this series that was tailored to center health equity and inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":"13 ","pages":"27536130241263486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241263486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are supported by clinical practice guidelines as effective non-pharmacologic interventions for common symptoms experienced by cancer patients, including anxiety, depression, and fatigue. However, the evidence predominately derives from White breast cancer survivors. Racial and ethnic minority patients have less access to integrative oncology care and worse cancer outcomes. To address these gaps, we designed and piloted a series of mindfulness-based group medical visits (MB-GMVs), embedded into comprehensive cancer care, for racially and ethnically diverse patients in cancer treatment.

Methods: As a quality improvement project, we launched a telehealth MB-GMV series for patients undergoing cancer treatment, delivered as four weekly 2-hour visits billable to insurance. Content was concordant with evidence-based guidelines and established MBIs and adapted to improve cultural relevance and fit (eg, access-centered, trauma-informed, with inclusive communication practices). Program structure was adapted to address barriers to participation, with ≥50% slots per series reserved for racial and ethnic minority patients. Intake surveys incorporated a demographic questionnaire and symptom assessments. Evaluations were sent following the visits.

Results: In our first ten cohorts (n = 78), 80% of referred patients enrolled. Participants were: 22% Asian, 14% Black, 17% Latino, 45% non-Latino White; 65% female; with a median age of 54 years (range 27-79); and 80% had metastatic cancer. Common baseline symptoms included lack of energy, difficulty sleeping, and worrying. Most patients (90%) attended ≥3 visits. On final evaluations, 87% patients rated the series as "excellent"; 81% "strongly agreed" that they liked the GMV format; and 92% would "definitely" recommend the series to others. Qualitative themes included empowerment and connectedness.

Conclusion: Telehealth GMVs are a feasible, acceptable, and financially sustainable model for increasing access to MBIs. Diverse patients in active cancer treatment were able to participate and reported high levels of satisfaction with this series that was tailored to center health equity and inclusion.

以正念为基础的集体就医:改善癌症治疗中不同患者的公平就医和包容策略。
背景:临床实践指南支持正念干预(MBI)作为有效的非药物干预方法,用于治疗癌症患者的常见症状,包括焦虑、抑郁和疲劳。然而,这些证据主要来自于白人乳腺癌幸存者。少数种族和少数族裔患者获得综合肿瘤治疗的机会较少,癌症治疗效果也较差。为了弥补这些差距,我们设计并试行了一系列基于正念的团体医疗访问(MB-GMVs),并将其嵌入癌症综合治疗中,为不同种族和族裔的癌症患者提供治疗:作为一个质量改进项目,我们为接受癌症治疗的患者推出了一系列远程医疗 MB-GMV,每周四次,每次 2 小时,可向保险公司付费。其内容与循证指南和既定的 MBI 相一致,并进行了调整,以提高文化相关性和适应性(例如,以就医为中心、创伤知情、具有包容性的沟通实践)。对计划结构进行了调整,以解决参与障碍,每个系列为少数种族和少数民族患者保留≥50%的名额。入院调查包括人口统计学问卷和症状评估。访问结束后发送评估报告:在我们的前十个组别(n = 78)中,80% 的转诊患者参加了治疗。参与者包括亚裔占 22%,黑人占 14%,拉丁裔占 17%,非拉丁裔白人占 45%;65% 为女性;中位年龄为 54 岁(27-79 岁不等);80% 患有转移性癌症。常见的基线症状包括乏力、睡眠困难和忧虑。大多数患者(90%)接受了≥3次治疗。在最终评估中,87% 的患者将该系列评为 "优秀";81% 的患者 "非常同意 "他们喜欢 GMV 的形式;92% 的患者 "肯定 "会向他人推荐该系列。定性主题包括授权和联系:结论:远程医疗全球监测视频是一种可行的、可接受的、经济上可持续的模式,可提高 MBIs 的可及性。正在接受癌症治疗的不同患者都能参与其中,并对这一系列以健康公平和包容为中心的活动表示高度满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信