Validation of the Korean version of the Sleep Hygiene Practice Scale in a Non-Clinical Population.

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Behavioral Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1080/15402002.2024.2367461

Dongyeop Kim, Ji Young Yun, Hye Ah Lee, Pamela Song, Heeyoung Ahn, Chien-Ming Yang, Jee Hyun Kim

{"title":"Validation of the Korean version of the Sleep Hygiene Practice Scale in a Non-Clinical Population.","authors":"Dongyeop Kim, Ji Young Yun, Hye Ah Lee, Pamela Song, Heeyoung Ahn, Chien-Ming Yang, Jee Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2024.2367461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the sleep hygiene practice scale (SHPS-K) and determine its effectiveness in screening poor sleepers with insomnia.Methods: Online survey was conducted using translated SHPS in Korean, the Korean versions of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-K), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (KESS) in a non-clinical population. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SHPS-K were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation analyses with other questionnaires and confirmatory factor analysis. We determined the cutoff values that could identify poor sleepers with insomnia symptoms (PSQI-K > 5 and ISI-K ≥ 15) using receiver operating characteristic analysis.Results: A total of 484 participants (242 women, mean age of 43.8 years) were enrolled. The average SHPS-K score was 71.2, with no significant sex differences. Women had poorer sleep scheduling and timing behaviors, and men had poorer eating and drinking behaviors. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.80) were observed. The SHPS-K was positively correlated with the PSQI-K (r = 0.55), ISI-K (r = 0.54), and KESS (r = 0.42). A cutoff value of 73 identified poor sleepers with insomnia (area under the curve = 0.828).Conclusions: The SHPS-K is a reliable instrument for evaluating sleep hygiene in non-clinical Korean populations.","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"791-802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2024.2367461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the sleep hygiene practice scale (SHPS-K) and determine its effectiveness in screening poor sleepers with insomnia.

Methods: Online survey was conducted using translated SHPS in Korean, the Korean versions of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-K), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (KESS) in a non-clinical population. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SHPS-K were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation analyses with other questionnaires and confirmatory factor analysis. We determined the cutoff values that could identify poor sleepers with insomnia symptoms (PSQI-K > 5 and ISI-K ≥ 15) using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: A total of 484 participants (242 women, mean age of 43.8 years) were enrolled. The average SHPS-K score was 71.2, with no significant sex differences. Women had poorer sleep scheduling and timing behaviors, and men had poorer eating and drinking behaviors. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.80) were observed. The SHPS-K was positively correlated with the PSQI-K (r = 0.55), ISI-K (r = 0.54), and KESS (r = 0.42). A cutoff value of 73 identified poor sleepers with insomnia (area under the curve = 0.828).

Conclusions: The SHPS-K is a reliable instrument for evaluating sleep hygiene in non-clinical Korean populations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在非临床人群中验证韩国版睡眠卫生实践量表。

研究目的本研究旨在验证韩文版睡眠卫生实践量表（SHPS-K），并确定其在筛查睡眠质量差的失眠患者方面的有效性：方法：在非临床人群中使用翻译成韩文的 SHPS、韩文版匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQI-K）、失眠严重程度指数（ISI-K）和爱普沃斯嗜睡量表（KESS）进行在线调查。SHPS-K的内部一致性和重复测试可靠性分别采用Cronbach's alpha和类内相关系数（ICC）进行评估。结构效度则通过与其他问卷的相关性分析和确证因子分析进行评估。我们采用接收器操作特征分析法确定了可识别有失眠症状的睡眠不良者的临界值（PSQI-K > 5 和 ISI-K ≥ 15）：共有 484 名参与者（女性 242 人，平均年龄 43.8 岁）参加了研究。SHPS-K平均分为71.2分，无明显性别差异。女性的睡眠安排和时间行为较差，男性的饮食行为较差。SHPS-K具有良好的内部一致性（Cronbach's alpha = 0.88）和重测可靠性（ICC = 0.80）。SHPS-K与PSQI-K（r = 0.55）、ISI-K（r = 0.54）和KESS（r = 0.42）呈正相关。73 的临界值可识别出睡眠质量差的失眠者（曲线下面积 = 0.828）：结论：SHPS-K 是评估韩国非临床人群睡眠卫生状况的可靠工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral Sleep Medicine CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHIATRY

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.