The use of artificial intelligence to detect voided medication orders in oral and maxillofacial surgery inpatients.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
John M Nathan, Kevin Arce, Vitaly Herasevich
{"title":"The use of artificial intelligence to detect voided medication orders in oral and maxillofacial surgery inpatients.","authors":"John M Nathan, Kevin Arce, Vitaly Herasevich","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01267-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine if supervised machine learning algorithms can accurately predict voided computerized physician order entry in oral and maxillofacial surgery inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Electronic Medical Record included patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, vital signs, laboratory values, and medication orders were retrospectively collected. Predictor variables included patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, vital signs, and laboratory values. Outcome of interest is if a medication order was voided or not. Data was cleaned and processed using Microsoft Excel and Python v3.12. Gradient Boosted Decision Trees, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Naïve Bayes were trained, validated, and tested for accuracy of the prediction of voided medication orders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37,493 medication orders from 1,204 patient admissions over 5 years were used for this study. 3,892 (10.4%) medication orders were voided. Gradient Boosted Decision Trees, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Naïve Bayes had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve of 0.802 with 95% CI [0.787, 0.825], 0.746 with 95% CI [0.722, 0.765], 0.685 with 95% CI [0.667, 0.699], and 0.505 with 95% CI [0.489, 0.539], respectively. Area Under the Precision Recall Curve was 0.684 with 95% CI [0.679, 0.702], 0.647 with 95% CI [0.638, 0.664], 0.429 with 95% CI [0.417, 0.434], and 0.551 with 95% CI [0.551, 0.552], respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gradient Boosted Decision Trees was the best performing model of the supervised machine learning algorithms with satisfactory outcomes in the test cohort for predicting voided Computerized Physician Order Entry in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery inpatients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01267-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if supervised machine learning algorithms can accurately predict voided computerized physician order entry in oral and maxillofacial surgery inpatients.

Methods: Data from Electronic Medical Record included patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, vital signs, laboratory values, and medication orders were retrospectively collected. Predictor variables included patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, vital signs, and laboratory values. Outcome of interest is if a medication order was voided or not. Data was cleaned and processed using Microsoft Excel and Python v3.12. Gradient Boosted Decision Trees, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Naïve Bayes were trained, validated, and tested for accuracy of the prediction of voided medication orders.

Results: 37,493 medication orders from 1,204 patient admissions over 5 years were used for this study. 3,892 (10.4%) medication orders were voided. Gradient Boosted Decision Trees, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Naïve Bayes had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve of 0.802 with 95% CI [0.787, 0.825], 0.746 with 95% CI [0.722, 0.765], 0.685 with 95% CI [0.667, 0.699], and 0.505 with 95% CI [0.489, 0.539], respectively. Area Under the Precision Recall Curve was 0.684 with 95% CI [0.679, 0.702], 0.647 with 95% CI [0.638, 0.664], 0.429 with 95% CI [0.417, 0.434], and 0.551 with 95% CI [0.551, 0.552], respectively.

Conclusion: Gradient Boosted Decision Trees was the best performing model of the supervised machine learning algorithms with satisfactory outcomes in the test cohort for predicting voided Computerized Physician Order Entry in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery inpatients.

使用人工智能检测口腔颌面外科住院病人的无效用药指令。
研究目的本研究旨在确定有监督的机器学习算法能否准确预测口腔颌面外科住院患者的计算机医嘱输入无效:回顾性收集电子病历数据,包括患者人口统计学特征、合并症、手术、生命体征、实验室值和医嘱。预测变量包括患者人口统计学特征、合并症、手术、生命体征和实验室值。关注的结果是药单是否作废。数据使用 Microsoft Excel 和 Python v3.12 进行清理和处理。对梯度提升决策树、随机森林、K-近邻和奈夫贝叶斯进行了训练、验证,并测试了预测药物订单作废的准确性:本研究使用了 5 年内收治的 1,204 名患者的 37,493 份用药单。有 3,892 份(10.4%)药单被作废。梯度提升决策树、随机森林、K-最近邻和 Naïve Bayes 的接收器工作曲线下面积分别为 0.802(95% CI)[0.787, 0.825]、0.746(95% CI)[0.722, 0.765]、0.685(95% CI)[0.667, 0.699]和 0.505(95% CI)[0.489, 0.539]。精确度回收率曲线下面积分别为 0.684(95% CI [0.679,0.702])、0.647(95% CI [0.638,0.664])、0.429(95% CI [0.417,0.434])和 0.551(95% CI [0.551,0.552]):梯度提升决策树是监督机器学习算法中性能最好的模型,在预测口腔颌面外科住院病人的计算机医嘱输入排空情况的测试队列中取得了令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信