Challenges with two epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a patient with lumbar adhesions: a case report.

Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1186/s40981-024-00724-1
Yuki Hosokawa, Rie Kato, Eriko Ohsugi, Michiko Sugita
{"title":"Challenges with two epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a patient with lumbar adhesions: a case report.","authors":"Yuki Hosokawa, Rie Kato, Eriko Ohsugi, Michiko Sugita","doi":"10.1186/s40981-024-00724-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of neuraxial analgesia varies with spinal canal pathology. Notably, a secondary epidural catheter has been shown to increase neuraxial labor analgesia in women with spinal lesions. Therefore, we present a case in which catheter withdrawal played a critical role in achieving effective labor analgesia in a woman with epidural adhesions after lumbar discectomy who had inadequate analgesia with two epidural catheters.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We encountered a patient with L5 lumbar epidural adhesions who reported pain even after receiving two epidural catheters. The catheters were placed in the L1/2 and L5/S intervertebral spaces. Analgesic effects were exerted when the L5/S catheter was withdrawn by 1 cm, suggesting that the catheter tip was initially placed inside the adhesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful consideration of catheter placement and adjustments by withdrawing the catheter are crucial in managing labor analgesia in patients with known epidural adhesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00724-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of neuraxial analgesia varies with spinal canal pathology. Notably, a secondary epidural catheter has been shown to increase neuraxial labor analgesia in women with spinal lesions. Therefore, we present a case in which catheter withdrawal played a critical role in achieving effective labor analgesia in a woman with epidural adhesions after lumbar discectomy who had inadequate analgesia with two epidural catheters.

Case presentation: We encountered a patient with L5 lumbar epidural adhesions who reported pain even after receiving two epidural catheters. The catheters were placed in the L1/2 and L5/S intervertebral spaces. Analgesic effects were exerted when the L5/S catheter was withdrawn by 1 cm, suggesting that the catheter tip was initially placed inside the adhesion.

Conclusions: Careful consideration of catheter placement and adjustments by withdrawing the catheter are crucial in managing labor analgesia in patients with known epidural adhesions.

分享
查看原文
腰椎粘连患者使用两种硬膜外导管分娩镇痛的挑战:病例报告。
背景:神经镇痛的效果因椎管病变而异。值得注意的是,在脊柱病变的产妇中,二次硬膜外导管已被证明可增加神经镇痛的效果。因此,我们介绍了一例腰椎间盘切除术后硬膜外粘连的产妇,在使用两根硬膜外导管镇痛不足的情况下,导管撤出在实现有效分娩镇痛方面发挥了关键作用:我们遇到了一名腰椎间盘切除术后硬膜外粘连的患者,她在使用了两根硬膜外导管后仍报告疼痛。导管分别置入 L1/2 和 L5/S 椎间隙。当将 L5/S 导管抽出 1 厘米时,镇痛效果显现,这表明导管尖端最初位于粘连处内部:结论:在管理已知硬膜外粘连患者的分娩镇痛时,仔细考虑导管放置位置并通过抽出导管进行调整至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信