Machine Learning to Predict Prostate Artery Embolization Outcomes.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
G Vigneswaran, N Doshi, D Maclean, T Bryant, M Harris, N Hacking, K Farrahi, M Niranjan, S Modi
{"title":"Machine Learning to Predict Prostate Artery Embolization Outcomes.","authors":"G Vigneswaran, N Doshi, D Maclean, T Bryant, M Harris, N Hacking, K Farrahi, M Niranjan, S Modi","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03776-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study leverages pre-procedural data and machine learning (ML) techniques to predict outcomes at one year following prostate artery embolization (PAE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis combines data from the UK-ROPE registry and patients that underwent PAE at our institution between 2012 and 2023. Traditional ML approaches, including linear regression, lasso regression, ridge regression, decision trees and random forests, were used with leave-one-out cross-validation to predict international prostate symptom score (IPSS) at baseline and change at 1 year. Predictors included age, prostate volume, Qmax (maximum urinary flow rate), post-void residual volume, Abrams-Griffiths number (urodynamics score) and baseline IPSS (for change at 1 year). We also independently confirmed our findings using a separate dataset. An interactive digital user interface was developed to facilitate real-time outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data were available in 128 patients (66.7 ± 6.9 years). All models predicting IPSS demonstrated reasonable performance, with mean absolute error ranging between 4.9-7.3 for baseline IPSS and 5.2-8.2 for change in IPSS. These numbers represent the differences between the patient-reported and model-predicted IPSS scores. Interestingly, the model error in predicting baseline IPSS (based on objective measures alone) significantly correlated with the change in IPSS at 1-year post-PAE (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.2, p < 0.001), forming the basis for our digital user interface.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study uses ML methods to predict IPSS improvement at 1 year, integrated into a user-friendly interface for real-time prediction. This tool could be used to counsel patients prior to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03776-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study leverages pre-procedural data and machine learning (ML) techniques to predict outcomes at one year following prostate artery embolization (PAE).

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis combines data from the UK-ROPE registry and patients that underwent PAE at our institution between 2012 and 2023. Traditional ML approaches, including linear regression, lasso regression, ridge regression, decision trees and random forests, were used with leave-one-out cross-validation to predict international prostate symptom score (IPSS) at baseline and change at 1 year. Predictors included age, prostate volume, Qmax (maximum urinary flow rate), post-void residual volume, Abrams-Griffiths number (urodynamics score) and baseline IPSS (for change at 1 year). We also independently confirmed our findings using a separate dataset. An interactive digital user interface was developed to facilitate real-time outcome prediction.

Results: Complete data were available in 128 patients (66.7 ± 6.9 years). All models predicting IPSS demonstrated reasonable performance, with mean absolute error ranging between 4.9-7.3 for baseline IPSS and 5.2-8.2 for change in IPSS. These numbers represent the differences between the patient-reported and model-predicted IPSS scores. Interestingly, the model error in predicting baseline IPSS (based on objective measures alone) significantly correlated with the change in IPSS at 1-year post-PAE (R2 = 0.2, p < 0.001), forming the basis for our digital user interface.

Conclusion: This study uses ML methods to predict IPSS improvement at 1 year, integrated into a user-friendly interface for real-time prediction. This tool could be used to counsel patients prior to treatment.

Abstract Image

通过机器学习预测前列腺动脉栓塞术的结果。
目的:本研究利用手术前数据和机器学习(ML)技术预测前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)一年后的预后:这项回顾性分析结合了英国-ROPE登记处的数据以及2012年至2023年期间在我院接受前列腺动脉栓塞术的患者数据。采用传统的 ML 方法(包括线性回归、套索回归、脊回归、决策树和随机森林)和留空交叉验证来预测基线时的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和 1 年后的变化。预测因素包括年龄、前列腺体积、Qmax(最大尿流率)、排尿后残余尿量、Abrams-Griffiths 数字(尿动力学评分)和基线 IPSS(1 年后的变化)。我们还使用另一个数据集独立证实了我们的研究结果。我们开发了一个交互式数字用户界面,以方便实时预测结果:128 名患者(66.7 ± 6.9 岁)的完整数据。所有预测 IPSS 的模型都表现出合理的性能,基线 IPSS 的平均绝对误差在 4.9-7.3 之间,IPSS 变化的平均绝对误差在 5.2-8.2 之间。这些数字代表了患者报告的 IPSS 评分与模型预测的 IPSS 评分之间的差异。有趣的是,预测基线 IPSS 的模型误差(仅基于客观测量)与 PAE 后 1 年的 IPSS 变化有显著相关性(R2 = 0.2,p 结论:本研究使用 ML 方法预测 1 年后 IPSS 的改善情况,并将其集成到用户友好的界面中进行实时预测。该工具可用于在治疗前为患者提供咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信