Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes Using Low-Cost Dual Dye Technique: Identifying Factors Associated with Adequate False Negative Rate Threshold.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Care Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1159/000538654
Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Jayesh Chavda, Arpan Mishra, Dhananjaya Sharma, Shyam Ji Rawat, Rajesh Jain
{"title":"Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes Using Low-Cost Dual Dye Technique: Identifying Factors Associated with Adequate False Negative Rate Threshold.","authors":"Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Jayesh Chavda, Arpan Mishra, Dhananjaya Sharma, Shyam Ji Rawat, Rajesh Jain","doi":"10.1159/000538654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate (SLN-IR) of fluorescein-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in combination with methylene blue dye (MBD) and factors which can lead to a false negative rate (FNR) threshold of 10%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cross-sectional non-randomized validation study in patients with post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) clinically node negative axilla who were node positive prior to start of NACT. Patients underwent validation of SLNB using fluorescein (and blue LED light) and MBD. Axillary dissection was performed irrespective of SLNB histology. SLIN-IR and FNR were assessed and compared with various molecular subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SLNs were identified in 102 out of 120 (85%) post-NACT patients. The median number of sentinel lymph nodes identified was 2 (range 1-3). The SLN-IR using MBD was 85%, FD was 82.5%, and combined MBD FD was 85%. Two or more SLNs were removed in 72 patients and 11 patients had tumor in the rest of the axilla, resulting in an FNR of 17.4%. An FNR was 25% in case only one SLN was found, and it was 11.42% if two or more than two SLNs were excised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cohort study found that use of low-cost dual dyes in patients with positive axillary disease, rendered cN0 with NACT, with 2 or more negative SLNs with SLNB alone, results in an FNR of 11.4%. Her 2 positive and TNBC with 2 or more negative SLNs are associated with an FNR of <10%. However, the number of such patients was small and further studies with larger sample size are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate (SLN-IR) of fluorescein-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in combination with methylene blue dye (MBD) and factors which can lead to a false negative rate (FNR) threshold of 10%.

Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional non-randomized validation study in patients with post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) clinically node negative axilla who were node positive prior to start of NACT. Patients underwent validation of SLNB using fluorescein (and blue LED light) and MBD. Axillary dissection was performed irrespective of SLNB histology. SLIN-IR and FNR were assessed and compared with various molecular subtypes.

Results: The SLNs were identified in 102 out of 120 (85%) post-NACT patients. The median number of sentinel lymph nodes identified was 2 (range 1-3). The SLN-IR using MBD was 85%, FD was 82.5%, and combined MBD FD was 85%. Two or more SLNs were removed in 72 patients and 11 patients had tumor in the rest of the axilla, resulting in an FNR of 17.4%. An FNR was 25% in case only one SLN was found, and it was 11.42% if two or more than two SLNs were excised.

Conclusions: This cohort study found that use of low-cost dual dyes in patients with positive axillary disease, rendered cN0 with NACT, with 2 or more negative SLNs with SLNB alone, results in an FNR of 11.4%. Her 2 positive and TNBC with 2 or more negative SLNs are associated with an FNR of <10%. However, the number of such patients was small and further studies with larger sample size are warranted to confirm these findings.

使用低成本双染技术对新辅助化疗后淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者进行前哨淋巴结活检:确定与适当假阴性率阈值相关的因素。
背景:在这项研究中,我们评估了荧光素引导下前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)结合亚甲蓝染料(MBD)的前哨淋巴结(SLN)识别率(SLN-IR)的可行性,以及可能导致假阴性率(FNR)阈值达到10%的因素:这是一项前瞻性横断面非随机验证研究,研究对象为新辅助化疗(NACT)后临床腋窝结节阴性、NACT开始前结节阳性的患者。患者使用荧光素(和蓝色 LED 灯)和 MBD 接受了 SLNB 验证。无论 SLNB 组织学如何,均进行腋窝解剖。对SLIN-IR和FNR进行评估,并与各种分子亚型进行比较:结果:120 例 NACT 后患者中有 102 例(85%)确定了 SLN。确定的前哨淋巴结中位数为 2 个(1-3 个不等)。使用 MBD 的 SLN-IR 率为 85%,FD 为 82.5%,而联合 MBD 的 FD 率为 85%。72名患者切除了两个或两个以上的SLN,11名患者的肿瘤位于腋窝的其他部位,因此FNR为17.4%。只发现一个SLN的FNR为25%,切除两个或两个以上SLN的FNR为11.42%:这项队列研究发现,对于腋窝病变阳性、NACT检查结果为cN0、有2个或2个以上阴性SLN的患者,使用低成本的双染料单独进行SLNB,其FNR为11.4%。Her 2 阳性和 TNBC 有 2 个或 2 个以上 SLN 阴性的患者的 FNR 为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信