Measuring Intellectual Capital Performance of Indian Private Sector Banks Using WASPAS

R. Sunitha
{"title":"Measuring Intellectual Capital Performance of Indian Private Sector Banks Using WASPAS","authors":"R. Sunitha","doi":"10.46632/tfe/2/2/31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indian private sector banks are currently showing excellent performance. Their success is largely attributed to strong management practises, customer-centric strategies, technical breakthroughs, and risk management techniques. Indian private sector banks are quickly adopting digital transformation, responding to shifting market circumstances, and providing cutting-edge banking solutions. This has aided in expanding their customer base and raising client contentment. To inspire client confidence, they have also concentrated on enhancing service quality, offering individualised services, and putting in place robust security measures. Policy makers, regulators, and business experts can benefit from studies regarding the performance of Indian private sector banks and a knowledge of the elements that contribute to their growth and success. This makes it possible for them to locate best practises and methods that may be used repeatedly to enhance the general wellbeing and effectiveness of the banking industry. Comparative evaluations with public sector banks are possible by investigating the efficiency of private sector banks. The usefulness of various ownership structures and management philosophies in promoting financial performance, client satisfaction, and general competitiveness is evaluated through this comparison. The Weighted Aggregate Product Assessment (WASPAS) approach is a making decisions methodology which employs the Weighted Sum Model (WSM) as well as the Weighted Product Model (WPM) to rank and evaluate alternatives based on many criteria, each of which is weighted to reflect its relative relevance. An overall rating for each alternative is then determined by evaluating and combining the criteria utilising either additive or multiplicative techniques. This strategy enables decision-makers to consider both the advantages and disadvantages of each criterion among the possibilities. KAL has got first ranking and KMB has got lowest ranking in the Indian private sector banks. In this paper, The Performance of Indian private sector banks KAL has got first ranking and KMB has got lowest ranking.","PeriodicalId":498004,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Finance and Economics","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/tfe/2/2/31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indian private sector banks are currently showing excellent performance. Their success is largely attributed to strong management practises, customer-centric strategies, technical breakthroughs, and risk management techniques. Indian private sector banks are quickly adopting digital transformation, responding to shifting market circumstances, and providing cutting-edge banking solutions. This has aided in expanding their customer base and raising client contentment. To inspire client confidence, they have also concentrated on enhancing service quality, offering individualised services, and putting in place robust security measures. Policy makers, regulators, and business experts can benefit from studies regarding the performance of Indian private sector banks and a knowledge of the elements that contribute to their growth and success. This makes it possible for them to locate best practises and methods that may be used repeatedly to enhance the general wellbeing and effectiveness of the banking industry. Comparative evaluations with public sector banks are possible by investigating the efficiency of private sector banks. The usefulness of various ownership structures and management philosophies in promoting financial performance, client satisfaction, and general competitiveness is evaluated through this comparison. The Weighted Aggregate Product Assessment (WASPAS) approach is a making decisions methodology which employs the Weighted Sum Model (WSM) as well as the Weighted Product Model (WPM) to rank and evaluate alternatives based on many criteria, each of which is weighted to reflect its relative relevance. An overall rating for each alternative is then determined by evaluating and combining the criteria utilising either additive or multiplicative techniques. This strategy enables decision-makers to consider both the advantages and disadvantages of each criterion among the possibilities. KAL has got first ranking and KMB has got lowest ranking in the Indian private sector banks. In this paper, The Performance of Indian private sector banks KAL has got first ranking and KMB has got lowest ranking.
利用 WASPAS 衡量印度私营部门银行的智力资本绩效
印度私营银行目前表现出色。它们的成功主要归功于强大的管理实践、以客户为中心的战略、技术突破和风险管理技术。印度私营银行正在迅速采用数字化转型,应对不断变化的市场环境,并提供最先进的银行解决方案。这有助于扩大客户群,提高客户满意度。为了增强客户信心,它们还致力于提高服务质量,提供个性化服务,并采取强有力的安全措施。政策制定者、监管者和商业专家可以从有关印度私营银行业绩的研究中获益,了解促进其发展和成功的因素。这使他们有可能找到可反复使用的最佳做法和方法,以提高银行业的总体福利和效率。通过调查私营银行的效率,可以与公共部门银行进行比较评估。通过这种比较,可以评估各种所有制结构和管理理念在促进财务业绩、客户满意度和总体竞争力方面的作用。加权综合产品评估法(WASPAS)是一种决策方法,它采用加权总和模型(WSM)和加权产品模型(WPM),根据多项标准对备选方案进行排序和评估,每项标准都经过加权以反映其相对相关性。然后,通过利用加法或乘法技术对标准进行评估和组合,确定每个备选方案的总体评级。这种策略使决策者能够在各种可能性中考虑每项标准的优缺点。在印度私营银行中,KAL 排名第一,KMB 排名最低。在本文《印度私营银行的绩效》中,KAL 排名第一,KMB 排名最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信