{"title":"Patient safety — Are we speaking the same language?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Since the radical years following the <em>To Err is Human</em><span> report, patient safety<span> research has become settled on standardisation and audit<span> cultures. Recent work suggests a change in direction. Current efforts exploring the intricate relationship between stability and change within organisations establish a more balanced patient safety perspective. Frontline staff insights are key to this new knowledge.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p><span>This study aims to explore the patient safety perceptions of registered nurses working directly with patients in </span>acute care settings.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Facilitated reflexive workshops were conducted with nine wards from October to November 2022. Data analysis explored creative works and reflective notes of group discussions with frontline registered nurses using a critical lens.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We offer four analytical interpretations of how frontline registered nurses understand and experience patient safety. These are as follows: buzzwords, keep ME safe, listen to US, and this is MY role. These manifest the business of patient safety where nurses are, under siege, the silenced team member and experience tension between accountability and responsibility.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Critical questioning and reappraisal of patient safety practices require the vast knowledge of frontline staff to be fully utilised.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research reveals much of what is avoided in patient safety literature — the tension between what registered nurses understand, experience, and can deliver in patient safety practice. It challenges organisational leaders to enable and support frontline nurses in driving local change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 5","pages":"Pages 284-291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Since the radical years following the To Err is Human report, patient safety research has become settled on standardisation and audit cultures. Recent work suggests a change in direction. Current efforts exploring the intricate relationship between stability and change within organisations establish a more balanced patient safety perspective. Frontline staff insights are key to this new knowledge.
Aim
This study aims to explore the patient safety perceptions of registered nurses working directly with patients in acute care settings.
Method
Facilitated reflexive workshops were conducted with nine wards from October to November 2022. Data analysis explored creative works and reflective notes of group discussions with frontline registered nurses using a critical lens.
Findings
We offer four analytical interpretations of how frontline registered nurses understand and experience patient safety. These are as follows: buzzwords, keep ME safe, listen to US, and this is MY role. These manifest the business of patient safety where nurses are, under siege, the silenced team member and experience tension between accountability and responsibility.
Discussion
Critical questioning and reappraisal of patient safety practices require the vast knowledge of frontline staff to be fully utilised.
Conclusion
This research reveals much of what is avoided in patient safety literature — the tension between what registered nurses understand, experience, and can deliver in patient safety practice. It challenges organisational leaders to enable and support frontline nurses in driving local change.
期刊介绍:
Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN).
The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues.
Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor.
The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription.
ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.