‘Raskolniks ’ and ‘Inorodtsy ’: A Mutual Attraction

Q2 Social Sciences
Elena Danilko
{"title":"‘Raskolniks ’ and ‘Inorodtsy ’: A Mutual Attraction","authors":"Elena Danilko","doi":"10.2478/jef-2024-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Old Belief emerged as a broad social and religious movement in the second half of the 17th century as a result of church reform. The Old Believers who did not adopt the reforms were forced to flee to the outer reaches of Russia and were persecuted by both the church and secular powers until the beginning of the 20th century. This contributed to a great extent to the development of eschatological opinions and the striving for social and general isolation. A distinctive feature of the Old Believers’ culture is traditionalism, which is expressed in both everyday and religious practice. Old Belief, as a form of Christianity, is seen among most scholars and the general public as an exclusively Russian phenomenon. However, it was also quite widespread among a number of Finno-Ugric peoples; in the territory of the Ural and Volga region most of the non-Russian Old Believers were Mordovians or Komi-Permyaks. The main reasons for the process of transition from ‘inorodtsy’ (‘infidels’) to ‘raskolniks’1 (‘schismatics’) were the lack of social barriers (both were religious outsiders) and the conflict caused by the State’s policy of violent Christianisation. There were many different nuances in this process related to the problem of language, the perception among Finno-Ugrians of the use of books, and the closed nature of the group. In this paper, I would like to describe this based on archival documents and my own field research.","PeriodicalId":37405,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics","volume":"3 4","pages":"20 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jef-2024-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Old Belief emerged as a broad social and religious movement in the second half of the 17th century as a result of church reform. The Old Believers who did not adopt the reforms were forced to flee to the outer reaches of Russia and were persecuted by both the church and secular powers until the beginning of the 20th century. This contributed to a great extent to the development of eschatological opinions and the striving for social and general isolation. A distinctive feature of the Old Believers’ culture is traditionalism, which is expressed in both everyday and religious practice. Old Belief, as a form of Christianity, is seen among most scholars and the general public as an exclusively Russian phenomenon. However, it was also quite widespread among a number of Finno-Ugric peoples; in the territory of the Ural and Volga region most of the non-Russian Old Believers were Mordovians or Komi-Permyaks. The main reasons for the process of transition from ‘inorodtsy’ (‘infidels’) to ‘raskolniks’1 (‘schismatics’) were the lack of social barriers (both were religious outsiders) and the conflict caused by the State’s policy of violent Christianisation. There were many different nuances in this process related to the problem of language, the perception among Finno-Ugrians of the use of books, and the closed nature of the group. In this paper, I would like to describe this based on archival documents and my own field research.
拉斯科尼克 "和 "伊诺洛奇":相互吸引
摘要 旧信仰是 17 世纪下半叶因教会改革而兴起的一场广泛的社会和宗教运动。不接受改革的旧信仰者被迫逃往俄罗斯外围地区,并受到教会和世俗势力的迫害,直至 20 世纪初。这在很大程度上助长了末世论观点的发展以及争取社会和整体孤立的努力。旧教徒文化的一个显著特点是传统主义,这表现在日常生活和宗教实践中。旧信仰作为基督教的一种形式,被大多数学者和公众视为俄罗斯独有的现象。然而,它在一些芬兰-乌戈尔民族中也相当普遍;在乌拉尔和伏尔加地区,大多数非俄罗斯旧教徒是莫尔多维亚人或科米-百慕大人。从 "异教徒"(inorodtsy)到 "分裂者"(raskolniks)1 的转变过程的主要原因是缺乏社会障碍(两者都是宗教外来者)以及国家暴力基督教化政策造成的冲突。在这一过程中,有许多不同的细微差别,涉及语言问题、芬兰-乌戈尔人对书籍使用的看法以及该群体的封闭性。在本文中,我将根据档案文件和自己的实地调查对此进行描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics
Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics (JEF) is a multidisciplinary forum for scholars. Addressed to an international scholarly audience, JEF is open to contributions from researchers all over the world. JEF publishes articles in the research areas of ethnology, folkloristics, museology, cultural and social anthropology. It includes both studies focused on the empirical analysis of particular cases as well as those that are more theoretically oriented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信