Effect of pneumatic leg compression on phenylephrine dose for hypotension prophylaxis via variable rate infusion at cesarean delivery: an unblinded randomized controlled trial

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
{"title":"Effect of pneumatic leg compression on phenylephrine dose for hypotension prophylaxis via variable rate infusion at cesarean delivery: an unblinded randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Phenylephrine infusion is recommended to prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery (CD) but may be associated with dose-dependent side effects. We hypothesized that adding intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) of the lower legs to a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion will reduce the dose of phenylephrine required during CD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seventy-six healthy women undergoing elective CD under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to IPC or control groups (<em>n</em><span> = 38 per group). After spinal anesthesia, IPC of the lower legs was initiated in the IPC group, and all women received a phenylephrine infusion starting at 25 μg·min</span><sup>−1</sup> and increasing by 16.7 μg·min<sup>−1</sup> for systolic blood pressure (SAP) &lt; 90% baseline. If hypotension (SAP &lt; 80% baseline) occurred, 100 μg phenylephrine bolus was administered. The primary outcome was the dose of phenylephrine per minute.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The dose of phenylephrine per minute (34.4 ± 7.3 μg·min<sup>−1</sup> vs. 40.9 ± 9.5 μg·min<sup>−1</sup>, <em>P</em> = 0.001; mean difference −6.6 μg·min<sup>−1</sup>, 95% CI −10.5 to −2.7 μg·min<sup>−1</sup>) and the incidence of hypotension (24% vs. 55%, <em>P</em> = 0.005) were lower in the IPC group than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the total dose of phenylephrine (603.2 ± 217.1 μg vs. 706.2 ± 247.5 μg, <em>P</em> = 0.058; mean difference −102.9 μg, 95% CI −209.4 to 3.5 μg), maternal side effects, or neonatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intermittent pneumatic compression combined with a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion reduced the phenylephrine dose per minute and the incidence of hypotension during CD under spinal anesthesia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24002309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Phenylephrine infusion is recommended to prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery (CD) but may be associated with dose-dependent side effects. We hypothesized that adding intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) of the lower legs to a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion will reduce the dose of phenylephrine required during CD.

Methods

Seventy-six healthy women undergoing elective CD under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to IPC or control groups (n = 38 per group). After spinal anesthesia, IPC of the lower legs was initiated in the IPC group, and all women received a phenylephrine infusion starting at 25 μg·min−1 and increasing by 16.7 μg·min−1 for systolic blood pressure (SAP) < 90% baseline. If hypotension (SAP < 80% baseline) occurred, 100 μg phenylephrine bolus was administered. The primary outcome was the dose of phenylephrine per minute.

Results

The dose of phenylephrine per minute (34.4 ± 7.3 μg·min−1 vs. 40.9 ± 9.5 μg·min−1, P = 0.001; mean difference −6.6 μg·min−1, 95% CI −10.5 to −2.7 μg·min−1) and the incidence of hypotension (24% vs. 55%, P = 0.005) were lower in the IPC group than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the total dose of phenylephrine (603.2 ± 217.1 μg vs. 706.2 ± 247.5 μg, P = 0.058; mean difference −102.9 μg, 95% CI −209.4 to 3.5 μg), maternal side effects, or neonatal outcomes.

Conclusions

Intermittent pneumatic compression combined with a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion reduced the phenylephrine dose per minute and the incidence of hypotension during CD under spinal anesthesia.
气动腿部加压对剖宫产时通过变速输注预防低血压的苯肾上腺素剂量的影响:非盲随机对照试验
背景建议在剖宫产(CD)过程中输注苯肾上腺素以预防脊柱低血压,但可能会产生剂量依赖性副作用。我们假设,在输注可变速率的苯肾上腺素的同时对小腿进行间歇性气压按压(IPC),可减少 CD 期间所需的苯肾上腺素剂量。脊髓麻醉后,IPC 组开始对小腿进行 IPC,所有女性均接受苯肾上腺素输注,输注量从 25 μg-min-1 开始,以 16.7 μg-min-1 为基线增加收缩压(SAP)< 90%。如果出现低血压(SAP 大于 80% 基线),则注射 100 μg 苯肾上腺素。结果IPC组每分钟的苯肾上腺素剂量(34.4 ± 7.3 μg-min-1 vs. 40.9 ± 9.5 μg-min-1,P = 0.001;平均差异-6.6 μg-min-1,95% CI -10.5 to -2.7 μg-min-1)和低血压发生率(24% vs. 55%,P = 0.005)均低于对照组。两组的苯肾上腺素总剂量无明显差异(603.2 ± 217.1 μg vs. 706.2 ± 247.5 μg,P = 0.058;平均差异 -102.9 μg,95% CI -209.4 to 3.结论间歇性气压加压结合可变速率的苯肾上腺素输注降低了每分钟的苯肾上腺素剂量和脊髓麻醉下 CD 期间低血压的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信