Association between neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and efficacy outcomes with avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: post hoc analyses from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial

M. Tucker, Yu-Wei Chen, Martin H Voss, Bradley A McGregor, M. Bilen, Marc-Oliver Grimm, Paul Nathan, C. Kollmannsberger, Yoshihiko Tomita, Bo Huang, Robert Amezquita, M. Mariani, A. di Pietro, Brian Rini
{"title":"Association between neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and efficacy outcomes with avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: post hoc analyses from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial","authors":"M. Tucker, Yu-Wei Chen, Martin H Voss, Bradley A McGregor, M. Bilen, Marc-Oliver Grimm, Paul Nathan, C. Kollmannsberger, Yoshihiko Tomita, Bo Huang, Robert Amezquita, M. Mariani, A. di Pietro, Brian Rini","doi":"10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report post hoc analyses of efficacy with first-line avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib according to baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from the JAVELIN Renal 101 phase 3 trial.Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response per baseline NER were analysed in the overall population and in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1+) tumours. Multivariable Cox regression analyses to assess the effect of NER after adjustment for other baseline variables were conducted.In NER <median versus ≥median subgroups of the avelumab plus axitinib arm, HRs for PFS and OS were 0.81 (95% CI 0.630 to 1.035) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.481 to 0.940), and objective response rates (ORRs) were 63.9% vs 55.2%, respectively. The HR for PFS in the PD-L1+ subgroup was 0.72 (95% CI 0.520 to 0.986). Comparing NER-defined subgroups in the sunitinib arm, HRs for PFS and OS were 0.93 (95% CI 0.728 to 1.181) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.424 to 0.779), and ORRs were 32.8% versus 30.8%, respectively. Within NER subgroups, analyses of PFS, OS and ORR favoured avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib treatment. Interaction tests that assessed the association between treatment and NER yielded conflicting results when NER was assessed as a dichotomised variable (median cut-off) or continuous variable.Hypothesis-generating analyses suggest that baseline NER may be prognostic for longer OS irrespective of treatment. Analyses of the association between NER level and treatment outcomes with avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib were inconclusive.NCT02684006.","PeriodicalId":505335,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Oncology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report post hoc analyses of efficacy with first-line avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib according to baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from the JAVELIN Renal 101 phase 3 trial.Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response per baseline NER were analysed in the overall population and in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1+) tumours. Multivariable Cox regression analyses to assess the effect of NER after adjustment for other baseline variables were conducted.In NER
晚期肾细胞癌患者中性粒细胞与嗜酸性粒细胞比率与阿维列单抗加阿西替尼或舒尼替尼疗效之间的关系:JAVELIN肾101试验的事后分析
我们报告了根据基线中性粒细胞与嗜酸性粒细胞比率(NER)对JAVELIN肾101 3期试验中晚期肾细胞癌(aRCC)患者一线阿维单抗联合阿西替尼或舒尼替尼疗效进行的事后分析。我们分析了总体人群和程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1+)肿瘤患者的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和基线NER客观反应。在NER<中位数与≥中位数的阿维单抗加阿西替尼治疗组亚组中,PFS和OS的HR分别为0.81(95% CI 0.630~1.035)和0.67(95% CI 0.481~0.940),客观反应率(ORR)分别为63.9% vs 55.2%。PD-L1+亚组的PFS HR为0.72(95% CI 0.520至0.986)。比较舒尼替尼治疗组中的NER定义亚组,PFS和OS的HR分别为0.93(95% CI 0.728至1.181)和0.57(95% CI 0.424至0.779),ORR分别为32.8%和30.8%。在NER亚组中,PFS、OS和ORR分析结果显示,阿维单抗联合阿西替尼治疗优于舒尼替尼治疗。当NER被评估为二分变量(中位数截点)或连续变量时,评估治疗与NER之间关系的交互检验产生了相互矛盾的结果。假设生成分析表明,无论治疗与否,基线NER可能是延长OS的预后因素。NCT02684006.NCT02684006.NCT02684006.NCT02684006.NCT02684006.NCT02684006.NCT02684006.NCT02684006.NCT02684006.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信