Therapy-as-Theatre: Porosity and Circulations of Feeling in Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s An Octoroon (2014) and Duncan Macmillan’s Every Brilliant Thing (2013)

Sarah Busch, Heidi Lucja Liedke
{"title":"Therapy-as-Theatre: Porosity and Circulations of Feeling in Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s An Octoroon (2014) and Duncan Macmillan’s Every Brilliant Thing (2013)","authors":"Sarah Busch, Heidi Lucja Liedke","doi":"10.1515/zaa-2024-2013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines how theatre works as a form of therapy using Duncan Macmillan’s Every Brilliant Thing and Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s An Octoroon. Both depict fictional representations of psychotherapy but also use concepts from narrative therapy as developed by White and Epston (1990), such as the audience as witnesses and creators of their own story. We argue that therapy-as-theatre exerts a pull on the audience, which invites them to empathize, identify and understand, and draws them into the “affective arrangement” of the plays as defined by Slaby, Mühlhoff, and Wüschner (2019). The two plays bring together the therapeutic and the theatrical both in terms of content and form: in Every Brilliant Thing, the performer explicitly re-enacts conversations with a counsellor and mimics the therapy setting by sharing with the audience their feelings concerning the suicide of their mother. Similarly, in An Octoroon, the playwright’s alter ego BJJ makes himself vulnerable to the audience. However, the play also confronts spectators with hard truths about the history and topicality of racism that they may not be prepared to hear. Within the specific time frame of the shows, similar to the frame of a psychotherapy session, the two plays create self-contained affective spaces where feelings and emotions circulate between performers, spectators and among audience members.","PeriodicalId":293840,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik","volume":"5 4","pages":"179 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2024-2013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how theatre works as a form of therapy using Duncan Macmillan’s Every Brilliant Thing and Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s An Octoroon. Both depict fictional representations of psychotherapy but also use concepts from narrative therapy as developed by White and Epston (1990), such as the audience as witnesses and creators of their own story. We argue that therapy-as-theatre exerts a pull on the audience, which invites them to empathize, identify and understand, and draws them into the “affective arrangement” of the plays as defined by Slaby, Mühlhoff, and Wüschner (2019). The two plays bring together the therapeutic and the theatrical both in terms of content and form: in Every Brilliant Thing, the performer explicitly re-enacts conversations with a counsellor and mimics the therapy setting by sharing with the audience their feelings concerning the suicide of their mother. Similarly, in An Octoroon, the playwright’s alter ego BJJ makes himself vulnerable to the audience. However, the play also confronts spectators with hard truths about the history and topicality of racism that they may not be prepared to hear. Within the specific time frame of the shows, similar to the frame of a psychotherapy session, the two plays create self-contained affective spaces where feelings and emotions circulate between performers, spectators and among audience members.
治疗即戏剧:布兰登-雅各布斯-詹金斯的《一个百灵鸟》(2014)和邓肯-麦克米伦的《每件灿烂的事》(2013)中的多孔性和情感循环
摘要 本文通过邓肯-麦克米伦(Duncan Macmillan)的《每件灿烂的事》(Every Brilliant Thing)和布兰登-雅各布斯-詹金斯(Branden Jacobs-Jenkins)的《百灵鸟》(An Octoroon),探讨戏剧如何作为一种治疗形式发挥作用。这两部作品都虚构了心理疗法,但也使用了怀特和埃普斯顿(1990 年)提出的叙事疗法概念,如观众是自己故事的见证者和创作者。我们认为,"治疗即戏剧 "对观众产生了一种牵引力,促使他们产生共鸣、认同和理解,并将他们吸引到斯拉比、米尔霍夫和沃施纳(2019)所定义的戏剧的 "情感安排 "中。这两部戏剧在内容和形式上都将治疗和戏剧结合在一起:在《每件灿烂的事》中,表演者明确地重演了与辅导员的对话,并模仿治疗环境,与观众分享他们对母亲自杀的感受。同样,在《一个百灵鸟》中,剧作家的另一个自我 "BJJ "向观众展示了自己的脆弱。然而,该剧也让观众面对了他们可能没有准备好听到的有关种族主义的历史和现实的真相。在演出的特定时间框架内(类似于心理治疗过程的框架),这两部剧创造了自成一体的情感空间,在表演者、观众和观众之间,情感和情绪循环往复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信