The Management of older patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: implications of S1826

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
{"title":"The Management of older patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: implications of S1826","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is diagnosed in patients ages 60 and older in approximately 20%–25% of cases in Western populations. Outcomes in this subset of patients have historically been poor, with 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates significantly lower than those seen in younger patients. Challenges to overcome include age-related co-morbidities, and prominent and potentially lethal treatment-related toxicity. There have been increased efforts to study the older cHL patient population, including analysis of geriatric assessments and the integration of newer targeted therapies such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and nivolumab (N) into treatment paradigms. A recent phase 3 clinical trial (S1826, NCT03907488) led by the North American oncology cooperative groups compared brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV-AVD) with nivolumab, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD). At a median follow-up of 1-year, N-AVD improved PFS vs BV-AVD in patients and few immune adverse events were observed. Moreover, in a pre-planned subset analyses of cHL patients ages ≥60 years, the 1-year PFS for N-AVD was 93% (95% CI, 79%-98%) versus 64% (95% CI, 45%-77%) for BV-AVD. In addition, N-AVD was largely better tolerated particularly in older patients, which included markedly less neuropathy, lower treatment discontinuation, and less nonrelapse mortality. As a result, N-AVD is poised to become a standard of care for older, advanced-stage cHL patients who are fit for full-dose anthracycline-based combination therapy. More studies are needed to continue to improve outcomes for older cHL patients, especially unfit and frail populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21684,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in hematology","volume":"61 4","pages":"Pages 236-244"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0037196324000684/pdfft?md5=e89ef70dc2ccf7bbc437d3e3abd75b4a&pid=1-s2.0-S0037196324000684-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0037196324000684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is diagnosed in patients ages 60 and older in approximately 20%–25% of cases in Western populations. Outcomes in this subset of patients have historically been poor, with 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates significantly lower than those seen in younger patients. Challenges to overcome include age-related co-morbidities, and prominent and potentially lethal treatment-related toxicity. There have been increased efforts to study the older cHL patient population, including analysis of geriatric assessments and the integration of newer targeted therapies such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and nivolumab (N) into treatment paradigms. A recent phase 3 clinical trial (S1826, NCT03907488) led by the North American oncology cooperative groups compared brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV-AVD) with nivolumab, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD). At a median follow-up of 1-year, N-AVD improved PFS vs BV-AVD in patients and few immune adverse events were observed. Moreover, in a pre-planned subset analyses of cHL patients ages ≥60 years, the 1-year PFS for N-AVD was 93% (95% CI, 79%-98%) versus 64% (95% CI, 45%-77%) for BV-AVD. In addition, N-AVD was largely better tolerated particularly in older patients, which included markedly less neuropathy, lower treatment discontinuation, and less nonrelapse mortality. As a result, N-AVD is poised to become a standard of care for older, advanced-stage cHL patients who are fit for full-dose anthracycline-based combination therapy. More studies are needed to continue to improve outcomes for older cHL patients, especially unfit and frail populations.

老年霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的管理:S1826 的意义
在西方人群中,约有 20%-25% 的 60 岁及以上患者被诊断为典型霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)。这部分患者的治疗效果历来不佳,5 年无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存率明显低于年轻患者。需要克服的挑战包括与年龄相关的并发症,以及与治疗相关的突出且可能致命的毒性。对老年 cHL 患者群体的研究力度不断加大,包括老年评估分析以及将新型靶向疗法(如 brentuximab vedotin (BV) 和 nivolumab (N))纳入治疗范例。最近由北美肿瘤合作组织领导的一项三期临床试验(S1826,NCT03907488)对布伦妥昔单抗维多汀、多柔比星、长春新碱和达卡巴嗪(BV-AVD)与尼伏单抗、多柔比星、长春新碱和达卡巴嗪(N-AVD)进行了比较。在中位随访1年后,N-AVD与BV-AVD相比改善了患者的PFS,而且几乎没有观察到免疫不良事件。此外,在对年龄≥60岁的cHL患者进行的预先计划的亚组分析中,N-AVD的1年PFS为93%(95% CI,79%-98%),而BV-AVD为64%(95% CI,45%-77%)。此外,N-AVD在很大程度上耐受性更好,尤其是在老年患者中,包括神经病变明显减少、治疗中断率降低以及非复发死亡率降低。因此,N-AVD有望成为适合接受全剂量蒽环类联合疗法的老年晚期cHL患者的标准治疗方法。还需要进行更多的研究,以继续改善老年 cHL 患者的治疗效果,尤其是体质较差和虚弱的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in hematology
Seminars in hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Hematology aims to present subjects of current importance in clinical hematology, including related areas of oncology, hematopathology, and blood banking. The journal''s unique issue structure allows for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering a variety of articles that present dynamic and front-line material immediately influencing the field. Seminars in Hematology is devoted to making the important and current work accessible, comprehensible, and valuable to the practicing physician, young investigator, clinical practitioners, and internists/paediatricians with strong interests in blood diseases. Seminars in Hematology publishes original research, reviews, short communications and mini- reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信