Improved performance of k − ω SST turbulence model in predicting airfoil characteristics for a wide range of airfoil thicknesses

A. Adeel-Ur-Rehman, J. Theron, H. Kassem, B. Stoevesandt, J. Peinke
{"title":"Improved performance of k − ω SST turbulence model in predicting airfoil characteristics for a wide range of airfoil thicknesses","authors":"A. Adeel-Ur-Rehman, J. Theron, H. Kassem, B. Stoevesandt, J. Peinke","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/022064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of airfoils designed for wind turbine rotor blade applications were simulated with k − ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model in its standard form, the k − ω SST turbulence model with a modified a 1 constant (referred to as the a 1 method), the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, and the panel method XFoil. To assess their performance, the results of airfoil lift, drag, and coefficient of pressure were compared against available wind tunnel data, where available. The standard k −ω SST turbulence model is found to over-predict Reynolds shear stresses, delay the flow separation, and under-predict the separated-flow region on the airfoil’s suction side. Airfoil thicknesses between 11% and 36% of the chord length were studied. Using a modified a 1 constant, some airfoils exhibited up to a 20% improvement in the prediction of lift and drag coefficients within the post-stall range of angle of attack (AoA). It is important to note that the a 1 method’s applicability and effectiveness is specifically tested for airfoils, and its performance is highly dependent on the airfoil geometry.","PeriodicalId":16821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics: Conference Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics: Conference Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/022064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of airfoils designed for wind turbine rotor blade applications were simulated with k − ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model in its standard form, the k − ω SST turbulence model with a modified a 1 constant (referred to as the a 1 method), the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, and the panel method XFoil. To assess their performance, the results of airfoil lift, drag, and coefficient of pressure were compared against available wind tunnel data, where available. The standard k −ω SST turbulence model is found to over-predict Reynolds shear stresses, delay the flow separation, and under-predict the separated-flow region on the airfoil’s suction side. Airfoil thicknesses between 11% and 36% of the chord length were studied. Using a modified a 1 constant, some airfoils exhibited up to a 20% improvement in the prediction of lift and drag coefficients within the post-stall range of angle of attack (AoA). It is important to note that the a 1 method’s applicability and effectiveness is specifically tested for airfoils, and its performance is highly dependent on the airfoil geometry.
k - ω SST 湍流模型在预测各种机翼厚度的机翼特性方面的性能改进
采用标准形式的 k - ω 剪切应力传输(SST)湍流模型、修正了 a 1 常量的 k - ω SST 湍流模型(称为 a 1 方法)、Spalart-Allmaras 湍流模型和面板方法 XFoil 对设计用于风力涡轮机转子叶片的各种机翼进行了模拟。为了评估它们的性能,将机翼升力、阻力和压力系数的结果与现有的风洞数据(如有)进行了比较。结果发现,标准 k -ω SST 湍流模型对雷诺切应力的预测过高,延迟了气流分离,对机翼吸入侧的分离气流区域的预测不足。研究的机翼厚度介于弦长的 11% 和 36% 之间。使用修改后的 a 1 常量,一些机翼在失速后攻角(AoA)范围内的升力和阻力系数预测结果最多可提高 20%。值得注意的是,a 1 方法的适用性和有效性是专门针对机翼进行测试的,其性能在很大程度上取决于机翼的几何形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信