No Country for God: The Brutality of Western Territorial Appropriation in Blood Meridian

Anglia Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1515/ang-2024-0024
Sergio García Jiménez
{"title":"No Country for God: The Brutality of Western Territorial Appropriation in Blood Meridian","authors":"Sergio García Jiménez","doi":"10.1515/ang-2024-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1985 American author Cormac McCarthy published Blood Meridian, a novel that is set against the backdrop of the conquest of the West, a momentous and still relevant process that has acquired quasi-mythical dimensions throughout history and that is undoubtedly embedded in the United States’ national consciousness. In this article I will show the different mechanisms employed by Cormac McCarthy to deconstruct conventional Western narratives that glorify and sanction the Westward expansion as a courageous endeavour that shaped the American nation, hence underplaying the more devastating and pernicious side of this chapter of America’s imperialistic undertakings. To that end, I will argue that McCarthy contests the main tenets of the crucial 1893 Frontier Thesis proposed by Frederick Jackson Turner, in particular the depiction of American colonial expansion as a source of progress and democratic development; likewise I will contend that, in Blood Meridian, McCarthy aligns himself with the ideas of New Western Historians that offer a revisionist perspective of the country’s past, revealing such brutality and wickedness exerted in the appropriation of the western territories that seemed to deprive the process of any hope of God’s mercy.","PeriodicalId":511813,"journal":{"name":"Anglia","volume":"9 1","pages":"319 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2024-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In 1985 American author Cormac McCarthy published Blood Meridian, a novel that is set against the backdrop of the conquest of the West, a momentous and still relevant process that has acquired quasi-mythical dimensions throughout history and that is undoubtedly embedded in the United States’ national consciousness. In this article I will show the different mechanisms employed by Cormac McCarthy to deconstruct conventional Western narratives that glorify and sanction the Westward expansion as a courageous endeavour that shaped the American nation, hence underplaying the more devastating and pernicious side of this chapter of America’s imperialistic undertakings. To that end, I will argue that McCarthy contests the main tenets of the crucial 1893 Frontier Thesis proposed by Frederick Jackson Turner, in particular the depiction of American colonial expansion as a source of progress and democratic development; likewise I will contend that, in Blood Meridian, McCarthy aligns himself with the ideas of New Western Historians that offer a revisionist perspective of the country’s past, revealing such brutality and wickedness exerted in the appropriation of the western territories that seemed to deprive the process of any hope of God’s mercy.
没有上帝的国度血色子午线》中西方领土侵占的残酷性
摘要 1985 年,美国作家科马克-麦卡锡(Cormac McCarthy)出版了《血色子午线》(Blood Meridian),这部小说以征服西部为背景。在这篇文章中,我将展示科马克-麦卡锡运用不同的机制来解构传统的西方叙事,这些叙事将向西扩张美化为塑造美国民族的勇敢努力并予以认可,从而低估了美国帝国主义事业中更具破坏性和危害性的一面。为此,我将论证麦卡锡对弗雷德里克-杰克逊-特纳(Frederick Jackson Turner)于1893年提出的至关重要的 "边疆论"(Frontier Thesis)的主要原则提出的质疑,尤其是将美国的殖民扩张描绘成进步和民主发展的源泉;同样,我还将论证,在《血色子午线》中,麦卡锡与新西部史学家的观点不谋而合,他们对美国的过去提出了修正主义的观点,揭示了在侵占西部领土的过程中所表现出的野蛮和邪恶,这似乎剥夺了上帝怜悯的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书