Sensory research and Temporal Descriptive Methods: Where is this relationship going?

M.V. Galmarini , M. Visalli
{"title":"Sensory research and Temporal Descriptive Methods: Where is this relationship going?","authors":"M.V. Galmarini ,&nbsp;M. Visalli","doi":"10.1016/j.sctalk.2024.100375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is well known that perception of food and drink is a temporal phenomenon. And it is under this premise that several temporal methods have been developed in the past 50 years trying to capture, describe and quantify these sensory changes occurring during food tasting.</p><p>More than one hand is needed to count the amount of multi-attribute temporal methods which have been developed since 1994, when the Progressive Profile was first published. From one bite to a whole portion, these methods have been used to evaluate product qualities, consumer behavior and food oral processing, among other challenges. But sometimes it seems that methods are developed faster than they can be validated.</p><p>In this presentation 363 research articles (from 1991 to 2022) using temporal descriptive methods were analyzed according to a previously validated protocol. A quantitative and qualitative synthesis of the results allowed the identification of trends in how methods were developed, refined, and disseminated. Some critical research gaps in establishing the validity and reliability of the methods were identified and discussed. Results suggest the need for general guidelines on how to implement the method, analyze and interpret data, and report the results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101148,"journal":{"name":"Science Talks","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569324000835/pdfft?md5=4b00168a93f5e8f29cd5ca9c3340266b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772569324000835-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Talks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569324000835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well known that perception of food and drink is a temporal phenomenon. And it is under this premise that several temporal methods have been developed in the past 50 years trying to capture, describe and quantify these sensory changes occurring during food tasting.

More than one hand is needed to count the amount of multi-attribute temporal methods which have been developed since 1994, when the Progressive Profile was first published. From one bite to a whole portion, these methods have been used to evaluate product qualities, consumer behavior and food oral processing, among other challenges. But sometimes it seems that methods are developed faster than they can be validated.

In this presentation 363 research articles (from 1991 to 2022) using temporal descriptive methods were analyzed according to a previously validated protocol. A quantitative and qualitative synthesis of the results allowed the identification of trends in how methods were developed, refined, and disseminated. Some critical research gaps in establishing the validity and reliability of the methods were identified and discussed. Results suggest the need for general guidelines on how to implement the method, analyze and interpret data, and report the results.

感官研究与时间描述方法:这种关系将何去何从?
众所周知,对食物和饮料的感知是一种时间现象。正是在这一前提下,过去 50 年来,人们开发了多种时间方法,试图捕捉、描述和量化品尝食物过程中发生的感官变化。从一口到一整份,这些方法已被用于评估产品品质、消费者行为和食品口腔加工等难题。但有时,方法的开发速度似乎比验证速度更快。在本报告中,我们根据之前验证过的协议,对363篇使用时间描述法的研究文章(从1991年到2022年)进行了分析。通过对结果进行定量和定性的综合分析,可以发现方法的发展、完善和传播趋势。在确定方法的有效性和可靠性方面,发现并讨论了一些关键的研究差距。研究结果表明,有必要就如何实施方法、分析和解释数据以及报告结果制定一般性指导原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信