Horizontes expandidos en TAVI: explorando las rutas de acceso no transfemoral para cirujanos cardíacos

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Víctor X. Mosquera
{"title":"Horizontes expandidos en TAVI: explorando las rutas de acceso no transfemoral para cirujanos cardíacos","authors":"Víctor X. Mosquera","doi":"10.1016/j.circv.2024.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the primary treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, particularly in patients over 75 years of age and those at high surgical risk. In the last two decades, the number of TAVI procedures has significantly increased, and this trend is expected to continue. Despite the preference for transfemoral access in TAVI, it is unsuitable for up to 20% of patients due to anatomical contraindications such as inadequate vessel size, heavily calcified iliofemoral vasculature, or extreme vessel tortuosity. This has led to the exploration and development of non-TF TAVI approaches, including intrathoracic and extrathoracic approaches.</div><div>The emergence of different access routes for TAVI has not been simultaneous, and the choice between intrathoracic and extrathoracic accesses is multifaceted, influenced by the patient's anatomy, comorbidities, and the expertise of the treating center. The transapical approach, classified as intrathoracic, has been the main non transfemoral alternative for nearly a decade. However, the emergence of extrathoracic accesses, such as the transcarotid and transsubclavian approaches, has broadened the horizons of TAVI, potentially offering better outcomes for specific patient populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":42671,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 80-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the primary treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, particularly in patients over 75 years of age and those at high surgical risk. In the last two decades, the number of TAVI procedures has significantly increased, and this trend is expected to continue. Despite the preference for transfemoral access in TAVI, it is unsuitable for up to 20% of patients due to anatomical contraindications such as inadequate vessel size, heavily calcified iliofemoral vasculature, or extreme vessel tortuosity. This has led to the exploration and development of non-TF TAVI approaches, including intrathoracic and extrathoracic approaches.
The emergence of different access routes for TAVI has not been simultaneous, and the choice between intrathoracic and extrathoracic accesses is multifaceted, influenced by the patient's anatomy, comorbidities, and the expertise of the treating center. The transapical approach, classified as intrathoracic, has been the main non transfemoral alternative for nearly a decade. However, the emergence of extrathoracic accesses, such as the transcarotid and transsubclavian approaches, has broadened the horizons of TAVI, potentially offering better outcomes for specific patient populations.
拓展 TAVI 的视野:为心脏外科医生探索非经股动脉入路途径
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(Transcatheter aortic valve implantation, TAVI)已成为重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的主要治疗方法,尤其是75岁以上及手术风险高的患者。在过去的二十年里,TAVI手术的数量显著增加,预计这一趋势将继续下去。尽管TAVI首选经股入路,但由于解剖禁忌,如血管大小不足、髂股血管严重钙化或血管极度扭曲,高达20%的患者不适合经股入路。这导致了非tf TAVI入路的探索和发展,包括胸内和胸外入路。TAVI不同入路的出现并非同时发生,胸内和胸外入路的选择是多方面的,受患者解剖结构、合并症和治疗中心专业知识的影响。经根尖入路被归类为胸内入路,近十年来一直是主要的非经股入路选择。然而,胸外入路的出现,如经颈动脉入路和经锁骨下入路,拓宽了TAVI的视野,可能为特定患者群体提供更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
109
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信