Deep learning-based prediction of CME-driven shock standoff distances in metric type II radio emissions

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Kwabena Kyeremateng, Amr Hamada, Ahmed Elsaid, Ayman Mahrous
{"title":"Deep learning-based prediction of CME-driven shock standoff distances in metric type II radio emissions","authors":"Kwabena Kyeremateng,&nbsp;Amr Hamada,&nbsp;Ahmed Elsaid,&nbsp;Ayman Mahrous","doi":"10.1007/s10509-024-04319-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Type II radio emissions are events mostly found to be associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and accelerated by the CME-driven shock in the heliosphere. This study reports on the estimation of the CME-shock standoff distance at the commencement of metric type II radio emissions by combining the CME-deprojected speed and spectral features of radio bursts using a robust TensorFlow Deep-Learning Sequential (TFDLS) technique. The dataset of 96 CMEs at the commencement of type II radio bursts was used between Solar cycle 24 and the ascending phase of Solar Cycle 25. The measured root mean squared error (RMSE) was 0.145 (Rs), with an average height difference of 0.096 Rs between the observed and predicted CME-shock heights. Five (5) CMEs/radio bursts energetic events associated with solar flares were selected from the test data, and the CME shock stand-off heights were forecasted using the TFDLS and flare-onset (FL) methods. The data were used to compare the leading-edge (LE) and dynamic spectra (DS) methods. The RMSE measured between the FL and LE was 0.35 Rs, and the RMSE estimated between the TFDLS and LE approaches was 0.04 Rs. The RMSE between FL and DS was 0.34. Rs, and the RMSE between the TFDLS and the DS was 0.04 Rs. We also used the findings gained from the five selected events and compared them to the 3D shock-fitting (3D-SF) approach. The RMSE found between the TFDLS and the 3D-SF was 0.18 Rs, while the RMSE estimated between the FL and the 3D-SF was 0.23 Rs. This shows that the TFDLS has satisfactory performance and can be used as an alternative technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"369 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04319-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type II radio emissions are events mostly found to be associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and accelerated by the CME-driven shock in the heliosphere. This study reports on the estimation of the CME-shock standoff distance at the commencement of metric type II radio emissions by combining the CME-deprojected speed and spectral features of radio bursts using a robust TensorFlow Deep-Learning Sequential (TFDLS) technique. The dataset of 96 CMEs at the commencement of type II radio bursts was used between Solar cycle 24 and the ascending phase of Solar Cycle 25. The measured root mean squared error (RMSE) was 0.145 (Rs), with an average height difference of 0.096 Rs between the observed and predicted CME-shock heights. Five (5) CMEs/radio bursts energetic events associated with solar flares were selected from the test data, and the CME shock stand-off heights were forecasted using the TFDLS and flare-onset (FL) methods. The data were used to compare the leading-edge (LE) and dynamic spectra (DS) methods. The RMSE measured between the FL and LE was 0.35 Rs, and the RMSE estimated between the TFDLS and LE approaches was 0.04 Rs. The RMSE between FL and DS was 0.34. Rs, and the RMSE between the TFDLS and the DS was 0.04 Rs. We also used the findings gained from the five selected events and compared them to the 3D shock-fitting (3D-SF) approach. The RMSE found between the TFDLS and the 3D-SF was 0.18 Rs, while the RMSE estimated between the FL and the 3D-SF was 0.23 Rs. This shows that the TFDLS has satisfactory performance and can be used as an alternative technique.

Abstract Image

基于深度学习的公制 II 型射电发射中受 CME 驱动的冲击距离预测
第二类射电辐射事件大多与日冕物质抛射(CME)有关,并由日光层中CME驱动的冲击加速。本研究报告了利用稳健的 TensorFlow 深度学习序列(TFDLS)技术,结合射电暴的 CME 投影速度和光谱特征,估算公转 II 型射电辐射开始时的 CME 冲击对峙距离。在太阳周期24和太阳周期25的上升阶段之间,在II型射电暴开始时使用了96个CME数据集。测得的均方根误差(RMSE)为0.145(Rs),观测到的和预测的CME冲击高度平均相差0.096 Rs。从测试数据中选取了五(5)个与太阳耀斑相关的 CME/放射性爆发高能事件,并使用 TFDLS 和耀斑起始(FL)方法预测了 CME 冲击高度。这些数据用于比较前缘法(LE)和动态光谱法(DS)。在 FL 和 LE 之间测得的均方根误差为 0.35 Rs,在 TFDLS 和 LE 方法之间估计的均方根误差为 0.04 Rs。我们还利用从五个选定事件中获得的结果,将其与三维冲击拟合(3D-SF)方法进行了比较。发现 TFDLS 与 3D-SF 之间的均方根误差为 0.18 Rs,而 FL 与 3D-SF 之间的估计均方根误差为 0.23 Rs。这表明 TFDLS 的性能令人满意,可以作为一种替代技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astrophysics and Space Science
Astrophysics and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered. The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing. Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信