Kwabena Kyeremateng, Amr Hamada, Ahmed Elsaid, Ayman Mahrous
{"title":"Deep learning-based prediction of CME-driven shock standoff distances in metric type II radio emissions","authors":"Kwabena Kyeremateng, Amr Hamada, Ahmed Elsaid, Ayman Mahrous","doi":"10.1007/s10509-024-04319-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Type II radio emissions are events mostly found to be associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and accelerated by the CME-driven shock in the heliosphere. This study reports on the estimation of the CME-shock standoff distance at the commencement of metric type II radio emissions by combining the CME-deprojected speed and spectral features of radio bursts using a robust TensorFlow Deep-Learning Sequential (TFDLS) technique. The dataset of 96 CMEs at the commencement of type II radio bursts was used between Solar cycle 24 and the ascending phase of Solar Cycle 25. The measured root mean squared error (RMSE) was 0.145 (Rs), with an average height difference of 0.096 Rs between the observed and predicted CME-shock heights. Five (5) CMEs/radio bursts energetic events associated with solar flares were selected from the test data, and the CME shock stand-off heights were forecasted using the TFDLS and flare-onset (FL) methods. The data were used to compare the leading-edge (LE) and dynamic spectra (DS) methods. The RMSE measured between the FL and LE was 0.35 Rs, and the RMSE estimated between the TFDLS and LE approaches was 0.04 Rs. The RMSE between FL and DS was 0.34. Rs, and the RMSE between the TFDLS and the DS was 0.04 Rs. We also used the findings gained from the five selected events and compared them to the 3D shock-fitting (3D-SF) approach. The RMSE found between the TFDLS and the 3D-SF was 0.18 Rs, while the RMSE estimated between the FL and the 3D-SF was 0.23 Rs. This shows that the TFDLS has satisfactory performance and can be used as an alternative technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"369 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04319-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Type II radio emissions are events mostly found to be associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and accelerated by the CME-driven shock in the heliosphere. This study reports on the estimation of the CME-shock standoff distance at the commencement of metric type II radio emissions by combining the CME-deprojected speed and spectral features of radio bursts using a robust TensorFlow Deep-Learning Sequential (TFDLS) technique. The dataset of 96 CMEs at the commencement of type II radio bursts was used between Solar cycle 24 and the ascending phase of Solar Cycle 25. The measured root mean squared error (RMSE) was 0.145 (Rs), with an average height difference of 0.096 Rs between the observed and predicted CME-shock heights. Five (5) CMEs/radio bursts energetic events associated with solar flares were selected from the test data, and the CME shock stand-off heights were forecasted using the TFDLS and flare-onset (FL) methods. The data were used to compare the leading-edge (LE) and dynamic spectra (DS) methods. The RMSE measured between the FL and LE was 0.35 Rs, and the RMSE estimated between the TFDLS and LE approaches was 0.04 Rs. The RMSE between FL and DS was 0.34. Rs, and the RMSE between the TFDLS and the DS was 0.04 Rs. We also used the findings gained from the five selected events and compared them to the 3D shock-fitting (3D-SF) approach. The RMSE found between the TFDLS and the 3D-SF was 0.18 Rs, while the RMSE estimated between the FL and the 3D-SF was 0.23 Rs. This shows that the TFDLS has satisfactory performance and can be used as an alternative technique.
期刊介绍:
Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered.
The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing.
Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.