Contributors Page

Jürgen Buchenau, Jill Massino, Carmen Soliz, Matilde Ciolli, José Antonio Galindo Domínguez, Eunice Rojas, Thomas Ruckebusch, Mary Elizabeth Watts, Keith Richards, John Thomas, S. Mattiace, Thomas Guderjan, Camila Vidal, Jayne Howell, Andrew J. Kirkendall, Ilan Palacios Avineri
{"title":"Contributors Page","authors":"Jürgen Buchenau, Jill Massino, Carmen Soliz, Matilde Ciolli, José Antonio Galindo Domínguez, Eunice Rojas, Thomas Ruckebusch, Mary Elizabeth Watts, Keith Richards, John Thomas, S. Mattiace, Thomas Guderjan, Camila Vidal, Jayne Howell, Andrew J. Kirkendall, Ilan Palacios Avineri","doi":"10.1353/tla.2024.a929903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The essay aims to reconstruct the early dissemination of neoliberal ideas in Argentina, particularly focusing on the thought of Friedrich A. von Hayek between 1955 and 1983. It argues that outside the regions where this theory was originally conceived, namely Europe and United States, its conservative and authoritarian core was accentuated and radicalized by both Western and Argentine neoliberal intellectuals. Specifically, on the one hand, Hayek’s thought was interpreted in continuity with the Argentine liberal-conservative tradition and used to validate and restore its most elitist and anti-democratic aspects. On the other hand, it was adopted to oppose Peronism, developmentalism, and socialism as well as to justify, dictatorial regimes tasked with temporarily restoring the conditions for a free-market society. The first part of the essay, therefore, examines the institutions, think tanks, and journals that allowed the initial circulation of neoliberal ideas in Argentina, illustrating how they were adapted to the local context. While the second part analyzes Hayek’s visits to Argentina and the content of his lectures, the last part examines how Hayek’s thought was interpreted by Álvaro Alsogaray, Carlos Sanchez Sañudo, and Alberto Benegas Lynch, shedding light on how they reinforced and pushed its conservative and authoritarian nucleus to its extreme consequences.","PeriodicalId":508998,"journal":{"name":"The Latin Americanist","volume":"11 2","pages":"181 - 182 - 183 - 189 - 190 - 218 - 219 - 243 - 244 - 258 - 259 - 281 - 282 - 296 - 297 - 300 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Latin Americanist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tla.2024.a929903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The essay aims to reconstruct the early dissemination of neoliberal ideas in Argentina, particularly focusing on the thought of Friedrich A. von Hayek between 1955 and 1983. It argues that outside the regions where this theory was originally conceived, namely Europe and United States, its conservative and authoritarian core was accentuated and radicalized by both Western and Argentine neoliberal intellectuals. Specifically, on the one hand, Hayek’s thought was interpreted in continuity with the Argentine liberal-conservative tradition and used to validate and restore its most elitist and anti-democratic aspects. On the other hand, it was adopted to oppose Peronism, developmentalism, and socialism as well as to justify, dictatorial regimes tasked with temporarily restoring the conditions for a free-market society. The first part of the essay, therefore, examines the institutions, think tanks, and journals that allowed the initial circulation of neoliberal ideas in Argentina, illustrating how they were adapted to the local context. While the second part analyzes Hayek’s visits to Argentina and the content of his lectures, the last part examines how Hayek’s thought was interpreted by Álvaro Alsogaray, Carlos Sanchez Sañudo, and Alberto Benegas Lynch, shedding light on how they reinforced and pushed its conservative and authoritarian nucleus to its extreme consequences.
投稿人页面
摘要:本文旨在重构新自由主义思想在阿根廷的早期传播,尤其侧重于弗里德里希-A-冯-哈耶克在 1955 年至 1983 年间的思想。文章认为,在这一理论的最初发源地--欧洲和美国--之外,其保守和专制的内核被西方和阿根廷的新自由主义知识分子所强调和激进化。具体而言,一方面,哈耶克的思想与阿根廷的自由-保守传统一脉相承,并被用来证实和恢复其最精英和最反民主的一面。另一方面,哈耶克的思想被用来反对庇隆主义、发展主义和社会主义,并为负责暂时恢复自由市场社会条件的独裁政权辩护。因此,文章的第一部分研究了使新自由主义思想得以在阿根廷初步传播的机构、智库和期刊,说明了这些思想是如何适应当地环境的。第二部分分析了哈耶克对阿根廷的访问及其演讲内容,最后一部分则探讨了阿尔瓦罗-阿尔索加雷、卡洛斯-桑切斯-萨努多和阿尔贝托-贝内加斯-林奇是如何诠释哈耶克思想的,揭示了他们是如何强化并推动其保守和专制的核心,使其达到极端的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信