Ensuring robust OSCE assessments: A reflective account from a Scottish school of nursing

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sandra Sharp, Austyn Snowden, Ian Stables, Ruth Paterson
{"title":"Ensuring robust OSCE assessments: A reflective account from a Scottish school of nursing","authors":"Sandra Sharp,&nbsp;Austyn Snowden,&nbsp;Ian Stables,&nbsp;Ruth Paterson","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This paper reflects on the experience of one Scottish University in conducting a face-to-face Objective Structured Examination (OSCE) for large cohorts of student nurses. It outlines the challenges experienced and learning gained.</p><p>Borton’s model of reflection frames this work due to its simplicity, ease of application and cyclical nature.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>The theoretical framework for the OSCE is critical thinking, enabling students to apply those skills authentically. OSCE’s are designed to transfer classroom knowledge to clinical practice and offer an authentic work-based assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Validity and robustness are key considerations in any assessment and in OSCE, the number of stations that students encounter is important and debated. We used a case-study based OSCE approach initially over four stations and following reflection, changed to one long station with four phases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In OSCE examinations, interrater reliability is a necessity, and students expect equity of approach. We identified that despite clear marking criteria, marks were polarised, with students achieving high or low marks with little middle ground. Review of examination papers highlighted that although students’ overall performance was good, some had failed in at least one station, suggesting a four-station approach may skew results. On reflection we hypothesised that using a one station case study-based, phased approach enabled the examiner to build up a more holistic picture of student knowledge and skills. It also provided the student opportunity to develop a rapport with the examiner and standardised patient, thereby putting them more at ease. We argue that this approach is holistic, authentic and student centred.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our experience highlights that a single station, four phase OSCE is preferrable, enabling students to integrate all aspects of the assessment and provides a holistic view of clinical skills and knowledge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001501","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This paper reflects on the experience of one Scottish University in conducting a face-to-face Objective Structured Examination (OSCE) for large cohorts of student nurses. It outlines the challenges experienced and learning gained.

Borton’s model of reflection frames this work due to its simplicity, ease of application and cyclical nature.

Background

The theoretical framework for the OSCE is critical thinking, enabling students to apply those skills authentically. OSCE’s are designed to transfer classroom knowledge to clinical practice and offer an authentic work-based assessment.

Design

Validity and robustness are key considerations in any assessment and in OSCE, the number of stations that students encounter is important and debated. We used a case-study based OSCE approach initially over four stations and following reflection, changed to one long station with four phases.

Results

In OSCE examinations, interrater reliability is a necessity, and students expect equity of approach. We identified that despite clear marking criteria, marks were polarised, with students achieving high or low marks with little middle ground. Review of examination papers highlighted that although students’ overall performance was good, some had failed in at least one station, suggesting a four-station approach may skew results. On reflection we hypothesised that using a one station case study-based, phased approach enabled the examiner to build up a more holistic picture of student knowledge and skills. It also provided the student opportunity to develop a rapport with the examiner and standardised patient, thereby putting them more at ease. We argue that this approach is holistic, authentic and student centred.

Conclusions

Our experience highlights that a single station, four phase OSCE is preferrable, enabling students to integrate all aspects of the assessment and provides a holistic view of clinical skills and knowledge.

确保健全的 OSCE 评估:苏格兰护理学院的反思性报告
目的 本文反思了苏格兰一所大学为大批护士学生举办面对面客观结构化考试(OSCE)的经验。由于 Borton 的反思模型简单、易于应用且具有循环性,因此该模型为本研究提供了框架。 背景 OSCE 的理论框架是批判性思维,使学生能够真实地应用这些技能。OSCE旨在将课堂知识转移到临床实践中,并提供真实的基于工作的评估。设计在任何评估中,有效性和稳健性都是关键的考虑因素,而在OSCE中,学生遇到的站点数量是重要的,也是有争议的。在 OSCE 考试中,评分者之间的可靠性是必要条件,学生也期望评分方法公平。我们发现,尽管评分标准明确,但分数却呈现两极分化,学生的分数有高有低,几乎没有中间值。对试卷的审查表明,虽然学生的整体表现良好,但有些学生至少有一个测站不及格,这表明四测站法可能会使结果出现偏差。经过反思,我们假设采用基于案例研究的单站分阶段方法,可以让考官更全面地了解学生的知识和技能。它还为学生提供了与考官和标准化病人建立融洽关系的机会,从而使他们更加从容。我们认为,这种方法是全面、真实和以学生为中心的。结论我们的经验突出表明,单站、四阶段的 OSCE 是可取的,它能让学生整合评估的所有方面,并提供临床技能和知识的整体视图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信