Method to identify if torsional mode of a building is its first mode

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
T. G, C.V.R.Mury
{"title":"Method to identify if torsional mode of a building is its first mode","authors":"T. G, C.V.R.Mury","doi":"10.5459/bnzsee.1645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Torsionally flexible buildings (that have torsional mode as fundamental mode) twist during earthquake shaking, and may collapse partially or completely depending upon the direction and level of shaking. The problem is aggravated when the building is torsionally unsymmetrical. Some design codes (like Eurocode, Indian Code) explicitly prohibit the design of such buildings. This paper presents a simple approximate method to identify torsionally flexible RC Moment Frame and RC Structural Wall buildings at the initial proportioning stage itself without carrying out a detailed structural analysis. It is possible to identify whether or not the first mode is torsional mode of a building (i.e., torsionally flexible building) if Natural Period Ratio τ>1 by modelling the building with rigid diaphragm and distribution of mass & stiffness along the height of building, and estimating: (1) radius of gyration of rotational mass rm of each floor plan geometry by lumping the masses of slabs, beams and all vertical elements at each nodes, (2) radius of gyration of twisting stiffness rKθ of all vertical elements using their translational and torsional stiffnesses (considering flexibility of adjoining beams and vertical elements accounting for both flexural and shear deformations), and (iv) τ (=rm/rKθ). The method is validated with 3D Modal Analysis (using τ =Tθ/T, where Tθ is Uncoupled Torsional Natural Period and T Uncoupled Translational Natural Period) of hypothetical buildings using a commercial structural analysis software. Also, parameters are identified that lead to τ>1, and solutions suggested to avoid torsional flexibility in buildings. Further, the method helps identify vertical stiffness irregularity in buildings. Draft provisions are suggested for inclusion in seismic codes. Also, poor performance of multi-storey building (with τ>1) is demonstrated using nonlinear static and nonlinear time history analyses.","PeriodicalId":46396,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Torsionally flexible buildings (that have torsional mode as fundamental mode) twist during earthquake shaking, and may collapse partially or completely depending upon the direction and level of shaking. The problem is aggravated when the building is torsionally unsymmetrical. Some design codes (like Eurocode, Indian Code) explicitly prohibit the design of such buildings. This paper presents a simple approximate method to identify torsionally flexible RC Moment Frame and RC Structural Wall buildings at the initial proportioning stage itself without carrying out a detailed structural analysis. It is possible to identify whether or not the first mode is torsional mode of a building (i.e., torsionally flexible building) if Natural Period Ratio τ>1 by modelling the building with rigid diaphragm and distribution of mass & stiffness along the height of building, and estimating: (1) radius of gyration of rotational mass rm of each floor plan geometry by lumping the masses of slabs, beams and all vertical elements at each nodes, (2) radius of gyration of twisting stiffness rKθ of all vertical elements using their translational and torsional stiffnesses (considering flexibility of adjoining beams and vertical elements accounting for both flexural and shear deformations), and (iv) τ (=rm/rKθ). The method is validated with 3D Modal Analysis (using τ =Tθ/T, where Tθ is Uncoupled Torsional Natural Period and T Uncoupled Translational Natural Period) of hypothetical buildings using a commercial structural analysis software. Also, parameters are identified that lead to τ>1, and solutions suggested to avoid torsional flexibility in buildings. Further, the method helps identify vertical stiffness irregularity in buildings. Draft provisions are suggested for inclusion in seismic codes. Also, poor performance of multi-storey building (with τ>1) is demonstrated using nonlinear static and nonlinear time history analyses.
确定建筑物扭转模式是否为其第一模式的方法
具有扭转弹性的建筑物(以扭转模式为基本模式)在地震摇晃时会发生扭曲,并可能根据摇晃的方向和程度部分或全部倒塌。如果建筑物的扭转不对称,问题就会更加严重。一些设计规范(如欧洲规范、印度规范)明确禁止设计此类建筑。本文提出了一种简单的近似方法,可在初始配比阶段识别扭转柔性 RC 弯矩框架和 RC 结构墙建筑,而无需进行详细的结构分析。通过以下方法可以确定建筑物的第一模态是否为扭转模态(即如果自然周期率 τ>1 ,则可以通过对具有刚性隔墙、质量和刚度沿建筑物高度分布的建筑物进行建模,并估算出以下结果,从而确定第一种模式是否为建筑物的扭转模式(即扭转柔性建筑物):(1) 通过将楼板、梁和所有垂直构件的质量集中在每个节点上,估算每个楼层平面几何的旋转质量 rm 的回旋半径;(2) 利用所有垂直构件的平移和扭转刚度,估算所有垂直构件的扭转刚度 rKθ 的回旋半径(考虑相邻梁和垂直构件的柔性,同时考虑挠曲和剪切变形);以及 (iv) τ(=rm/rKθ)。使用商业结构分析软件对假设建筑物进行三维模态分析(使用 τ =Tθ/T,其中 Tθ 为非耦合扭转自然周期,T 为非耦合平移自然周期),对该方法进行了验证。此外,还确定了导致 τ>1 的参数,并提出了避免建筑物扭转柔性的解决方案。此外,该方法还有助于识别建筑物的垂直刚度不规则性。建议将相关规定草案纳入抗震规范。此外,还利用非线性静态和非线性时间历程分析证明了多层建筑(τ>1)的不良性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
17.60%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信