Study of Risk Factors in Patients with Post Lapartomy Wound Dehisence

S. Faris, Muhammad Hussain Safi
{"title":"Study of Risk Factors in Patients with Post Lapartomy Wound Dehisence","authors":"S. Faris, Muhammad Hussain Safi","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.1029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-laparotomy wound dehiscence is a significant complication in abdominal surgeries, characterized by the partial or complete separation of the surgical wound layers. This complication can lead to severe morbidity, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs.\nObjective: To assess the risk factors associated with wound dehiscence in patients post-laparotomy.\nMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Surgery from January 25, 2024, to April 25, 2024. A total of eighty patients who developed wound dehiscence following emergency or elective laparotomy were selected. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and clinical variables were recorded. The risk factors for wound dehiscence, including peritonitis, infection, malignancy, hypoproteinemia, and anemia, were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with Chi-square tests employed to assess associations between risk factors and comorbid conditions. A significance level of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ethical approval was obtained, and the study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki principles.\nResults: The mean age of patients was 42.67 ± 15.26 years. Males had a higher frequency of wound dehiscence compared to females. The identified risk factors included wound infection (47; 58.8%), malignancy (37; 46.2%), hypoproteinemia (35; 43.8%), anemia (30; 37.5%), and peritonitis (22; 27.5%). A significant association was found between hypertension and the risk factors of wound infection (P=0.01), malignancy (P=0.002), and hypoproteinemia (P=0.01).\nConclusion: The study concluded that wound infection, malignancy, hypoproteinemia, anemia, and peritonitis are significant risk factors for wound dehiscence post-laparotomy. Hypertension showed a notable association with wound infection, hypoproteinemia, and malignancy. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative assessment and management of these risk factors to minimize the incidence of wound dehiscence.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.1029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-laparotomy wound dehiscence is a significant complication in abdominal surgeries, characterized by the partial or complete separation of the surgical wound layers. This complication can lead to severe morbidity, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Objective: To assess the risk factors associated with wound dehiscence in patients post-laparotomy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Surgery from January 25, 2024, to April 25, 2024. A total of eighty patients who developed wound dehiscence following emergency or elective laparotomy were selected. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and clinical variables were recorded. The risk factors for wound dehiscence, including peritonitis, infection, malignancy, hypoproteinemia, and anemia, were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with Chi-square tests employed to assess associations between risk factors and comorbid conditions. A significance level of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ethical approval was obtained, and the study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki principles. Results: The mean age of patients was 42.67 ± 15.26 years. Males had a higher frequency of wound dehiscence compared to females. The identified risk factors included wound infection (47; 58.8%), malignancy (37; 46.2%), hypoproteinemia (35; 43.8%), anemia (30; 37.5%), and peritonitis (22; 27.5%). A significant association was found between hypertension and the risk factors of wound infection (P=0.01), malignancy (P=0.002), and hypoproteinemia (P=0.01). Conclusion: The study concluded that wound infection, malignancy, hypoproteinemia, anemia, and peritonitis are significant risk factors for wound dehiscence post-laparotomy. Hypertension showed a notable association with wound infection, hypoproteinemia, and malignancy. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative assessment and management of these risk factors to minimize the incidence of wound dehiscence.
腹腔镜手术后伤口裂开患者的风险因素研究
背景:腹腔镜手术后伤口裂开是腹部手术中的一种重要并发症,其特点是手术伤口层部分或完全分离。这种并发症可导致严重的发病率、延长住院时间和增加医疗费用:评估腹腔镜手术后患者伤口开裂的相关风险因素:方法:2024 年 1 月 25 日至 2024 年 4 月 25 日在外科进行了一项横断面研究。共选取了 80 名急诊或择期开腹手术后出现伤口裂开的患者。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症和临床变量。评估了伤口开裂的风险因素,包括腹膜炎、感染、恶性肿瘤、低蛋白血症和贫血。统计分析使用 SPSS 25 版进行,采用卡方检验来评估风险因素与合并症之间的关联。P≤0.05的显著性水平被认为具有统计学意义。研究获得了伦理批准,并遵守了《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则:患者的平均年龄为(42.67 ± 15.26)岁。与女性相比,男性伤口开裂的频率更高。已确定的风险因素包括伤口感染(47;58.8%)、恶性肿瘤(37;46.2%)、低蛋白血症(35;43.8%)、贫血(30;37.5%)和腹膜炎(22;27.5%)。研究发现,高血压与伤口感染(P=0.01)、恶性肿瘤(P=0.002)和低蛋白血症(P=0.01)等风险因素之间存在明显关联:研究结论:伤口感染、恶性肿瘤、低蛋白血症、贫血和腹膜炎是腹腔镜手术后伤口裂开的重要风险因素。高血压与伤口感染、低蛋白血症和恶性肿瘤明显相关。这些发现强调了术前评估和管理这些风险因素以尽量减少伤口开裂发生率的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信