{"title":"Between Alexandria and Antioch: the Diverse Sources of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45","authors":"J. J. Lee","doi":"10.1163/18177565-bja10102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPatristic exegesis is often still viewed as a binary: Alexandria vs. Antioch, allegory vs. literal. While there are clear examples of interpreters who adhered to one school’s approach, there were many who sat somewhere between these two extremes. One notable example of this is Basil of Caesarea, who, when actually studied as an exegete, has often been miscast as a student of Antioch or Alexandria. An examination of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45, however, demonstrates that the sources behind Basil’s interpretive efforts cannot be limited to one exegetical ‘school’ or another, but actually represent a diverse range of readings, from Origen of Alexandria to Eusebius of Caesarea to Diodore of Tarsus. In his christological reading of this psalm, Basil resembles the Antiochenes, while in his overall spiritual vision and penchant for allegory, he draws on Origen. The example of Basil demonstrates the complexity of the exegetical world of the early church and the non-binary lines of influence, as well as the need for scholars of patristic exegesis to recognize nuance and complexity in their treatments of these writers.","PeriodicalId":38562,"journal":{"name":"Scrinium","volume":"209 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrinium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-bja10102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patristic exegesis is often still viewed as a binary: Alexandria vs. Antioch, allegory vs. literal. While there are clear examples of interpreters who adhered to one school’s approach, there were many who sat somewhere between these two extremes. One notable example of this is Basil of Caesarea, who, when actually studied as an exegete, has often been miscast as a student of Antioch or Alexandria. An examination of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45, however, demonstrates that the sources behind Basil’s interpretive efforts cannot be limited to one exegetical ‘school’ or another, but actually represent a diverse range of readings, from Origen of Alexandria to Eusebius of Caesarea to Diodore of Tarsus. In his christological reading of this psalm, Basil resembles the Antiochenes, while in his overall spiritual vision and penchant for allegory, he draws on Origen. The example of Basil demonstrates the complexity of the exegetical world of the early church and the non-binary lines of influence, as well as the need for scholars of patristic exegesis to recognize nuance and complexity in their treatments of these writers.
教父训诂学通常仍被视为二元对立:亚历山大与安提阿,寓言与字面。虽然有明显的解释者坚持一个学派的方法,但也有很多解释者介于这两个极端之间。凯撒利亚的巴西尔(Basil of Caesarea)就是一个明显的例子,在将他作为训诂学家进行实际研究时,经常会被误认为是安提阿或亚历山大的学生。然而,对巴西尔的《Homiliae super psalmos 45》的研究表明,巴西尔的解释工作背后的资料来源不能局限于一个或另一个训诂学 "流派",而实际上代表了从亚历山大的奥利到凯撒利亚的尤西比乌斯再到大数的迪奥多尔的多种解读。在对这篇诗篇的基督论解读中,巴西尔与安提阿学派相似,而在其整体灵性视野和对寓言的偏好上,他则借鉴了奥利。巴西尔的例子表明了早期教会训诂学世界的复杂性和非二元影响线,以及教父训诂学学者需要认识到他们在处理这些作家时的细微差别和复杂性。