Between Alexandria and Antioch: the Diverse Sources of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Scrinium Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1163/18177565-bja10102
J. J. Lee
{"title":"Between Alexandria and Antioch: the Diverse Sources of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45","authors":"J. J. Lee","doi":"10.1163/18177565-bja10102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPatristic exegesis is often still viewed as a binary: Alexandria vs. Antioch, allegory vs. literal. While there are clear examples of interpreters who adhered to one school’s approach, there were many who sat somewhere between these two extremes. One notable example of this is Basil of Caesarea, who, when actually studied as an exegete, has often been miscast as a student of Antioch or Alexandria. An examination of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45, however, demonstrates that the sources behind Basil’s interpretive efforts cannot be limited to one exegetical ‘school’ or another, but actually represent a diverse range of readings, from Origen of Alexandria to Eusebius of Caesarea to Diodore of Tarsus. In his christological reading of this psalm, Basil resembles the Antiochenes, while in his overall spiritual vision and penchant for allegory, he draws on Origen. The example of Basil demonstrates the complexity of the exegetical world of the early church and the non-binary lines of influence, as well as the need for scholars of patristic exegesis to recognize nuance and complexity in their treatments of these writers.","PeriodicalId":38562,"journal":{"name":"Scrinium","volume":"209 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrinium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-bja10102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patristic exegesis is often still viewed as a binary: Alexandria vs. Antioch, allegory vs. literal. While there are clear examples of interpreters who adhered to one school’s approach, there were many who sat somewhere between these two extremes. One notable example of this is Basil of Caesarea, who, when actually studied as an exegete, has often been miscast as a student of Antioch or Alexandria. An examination of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45, however, demonstrates that the sources behind Basil’s interpretive efforts cannot be limited to one exegetical ‘school’ or another, but actually represent a diverse range of readings, from Origen of Alexandria to Eusebius of Caesarea to Diodore of Tarsus. In his christological reading of this psalm, Basil resembles the Antiochenes, while in his overall spiritual vision and penchant for allegory, he draws on Origen. The example of Basil demonstrates the complexity of the exegetical world of the early church and the non-binary lines of influence, as well as the need for scholars of patristic exegesis to recognize nuance and complexity in their treatments of these writers.
在亚历山大和安提阿之间:巴西尔《超级诗篇》的不同来源 45
教父训诂学通常仍被视为二元对立:亚历山大与安提阿,寓言与字面。虽然有明显的解释者坚持一个学派的方法,但也有很多解释者介于这两个极端之间。凯撒利亚的巴西尔(Basil of Caesarea)就是一个明显的例子,在将他作为训诂学家进行实际研究时,经常会被误认为是安提阿或亚历山大的学生。然而,对巴西尔的《Homiliae super psalmos 45》的研究表明,巴西尔的解释工作背后的资料来源不能局限于一个或另一个训诂学 "流派",而实际上代表了从亚历山大的奥利到凯撒利亚的尤西比乌斯再到大数的迪奥多尔的多种解读。在对这篇诗篇的基督论解读中,巴西尔与安提阿学派相似,而在其整体灵性视野和对寓言的偏好上,他则借鉴了奥利。巴西尔的例子表明了早期教会训诂学世界的复杂性和非二元影响线,以及教父训诂学学者需要认识到他们在处理这些作家时的细微差别和复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scrinium
Scrinium Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信