《中美科技合作协定》的回顾及其展望——基于博弈论的视角

Haopeng Wang, Feifan Hu
{"title":"《中美科技合作协定》的回顾及其展望——基于博弈论的视角","authors":"Haopeng Wang, Feifan Hu","doi":"10.55574/qhlq5232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"《中美科技合作协定》的签署历程与发展历史解释了中美两国签订该协定的动因与维持双边科技合作关系的考量,并深刻揭示了两国科技合作关系背后的经济与政治博弈。现阶段,美国对华战略认知的调整与其将科技问题安全化的倾向导致了《中美科技合作协定》遭遇续签危机,其未来走向成为中美各界尤其关心的问题。博弈论为中美科技关系的战略转型提供有效的分析框架。其中,中美猎鹿博弈模型揭示了美国对华科技脱钩力度较弱的情况下双方进行合作的进路,而重复囚徒困境博弈模型则指出长期合作与互信的建立才是中美实现双赢的关键。中美两国应努力消除分歧,构建合作与竞争并存的新型关系,避免零和游戏,共同推动科技进步和全球发展。 The signing process and development of the US-China Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement (US-China S&T Cooperation Agreement) explain the reasons for the signing of the agreement and the considerations for maintaining the bilateral S&T cooperation relationship between China and the US, and deeply reveals the economic and political games behind the S&T cooperation relationship between the two countries. At this stage, the adjustment of the U.S. strategic perception of China and its tendency to securitize science and technology issues have led to the renewal crisis of the US-China S&T Cooperation Agreement, and its future direction has become an issue of particular concern to all sectors in the U.S. and China. Game theory provides an effective analytical framework for the strategic transformation of Sino-US S&T relations. The Stag Hunt Game Model reveals the way forward for cooperation between the two sides in the case of weak US S&T decoupling from China, while the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Model points out that the establishment of long-term cooperation and mutual trust is the key to achieving a win-win situation for both China and the US. China and the United States should strive to eliminate differences, build a new type of relationship where cooperation and competition coexist, avoid zero-sum games, and jointly promote scientific and technological progress and global development.","PeriodicalId":512508,"journal":{"name":"China Law Journal","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55574/qhlq5232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

《中美科技合作协定》的签署历程与发展历史解释了中美两国签订该协定的动因与维持双边科技合作关系的考量,并深刻揭示了两国科技合作关系背后的经济与政治博弈。现阶段,美国对华战略认知的调整与其将科技问题安全化的倾向导致了《中美科技合作协定》遭遇续签危机,其未来走向成为中美各界尤其关心的问题。博弈论为中美科技关系的战略转型提供有效的分析框架。其中,中美猎鹿博弈模型揭示了美国对华科技脱钩力度较弱的情况下双方进行合作的进路,而重复囚徒困境博弈模型则指出长期合作与互信的建立才是中美实现双赢的关键。中美两国应努力消除分歧,构建合作与竞争并存的新型关系,避免零和游戏,共同推动科技进步和全球发展。 The signing process and development of the US-China Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement (US-China S&T Cooperation Agreement) explain the reasons for the signing of the agreement and the considerations for maintaining the bilateral S&T cooperation relationship between China and the US, and deeply reveals the economic and political games behind the S&T cooperation relationship between the two countries. At this stage, the adjustment of the U.S. strategic perception of China and its tendency to securitize science and technology issues have led to the renewal crisis of the US-China S&T Cooperation Agreement, and its future direction has become an issue of particular concern to all sectors in the U.S. and China. Game theory provides an effective analytical framework for the strategic transformation of Sino-US S&T relations. The Stag Hunt Game Model reveals the way forward for cooperation between the two sides in the case of weak US S&T decoupling from China, while the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Model points out that the establishment of long-term cooperation and mutual trust is the key to achieving a win-win situation for both China and the US. China and the United States should strive to eliminate differences, build a new type of relationship where cooperation and competition coexist, avoid zero-sum games, and jointly promote scientific and technological progress and global development.
《中美科技合作协定》的回顾及其展望——基于博弈论的视角
《中美科技合作协定》的签署历程与发展历史解释了中美两国签订该协定的动因与维持双边科技合作关系的考量,并深刻揭示了两国科技合作关系背后的经济与政治博弈。现阶段,美国对华战略认知的调整与其将科技问题安全化的倾向导致了《中美科技合作协定》遭遇续签危机,其未来走向成为中美各界尤其关心的问题。博弈论为中美科技关系的战略转型提供有效的分析框架。其中,中美猎鹿博弈模型揭示了美国对华科技脱钩力度较弱的情况下双方进行合作的进路,而重复囚徒困境博弈模型则指出长期合作与互信的建立才是中美实现双赢的关键。中美两国应努力消除分歧,构建合作与竞争并存的新型关系,避免零和游戏,共同推动科技进步和全球发展。中美两国应努力消除分歧,构建合作与竞争并存的新型关系,避免零和游戏,共同推动科技进步和全球发展。中美两国应努力消除分歧,构建合作与竞争并存的新型关系,避免零和游戏,共同推动科技进步和全球发展、并深刻揭示了两国科技合作关系背后的经济和政治博弈。现阶段,美国对华战略认知的调整及其科技问题的安全化倾向导致了中美科技合作协定的续签危机,其未来走向成为中美各界尤为关注的问题。博弈论为中美科技关系的战略转型提供了有效的分析框架。猎鹿博弈模型揭示了在美国科技与中国脱钩乏力的情况下双方合作的出路,而重复囚徒困境博弈模型则指出,建立长期合作与互信是实现中美双赢的关键。中美应努力消除分歧,构建合作与竞争并存的新型关系,避免零和博弈,共同推动科技进步和全球发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信