Understanding self-regulation strategies in problem-based learning through dispositional learning analytics

Dirk T. Tempelaar, Anikó Bátori, B. Giesbers
{"title":"Understanding self-regulation strategies in problem-based learning through dispositional learning analytics","authors":"Dirk T. Tempelaar, Anikó Bátori, B. Giesbers","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2024.1382771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the ongoing discussion about how learning analytics can effectively support self-regulated student learning and which types of data are most suitable for this purpose, this empirical study aligns with the framework who advocated the inclusion of both behavioral trace data and survey data in learning analytics studies. By incorporating learning dispositions in our learning analytics modeling, this research aims to investigate and understand how students engage with learning tasks, tools, and materials in their academic endeavors. This is achieved by analyzing trace data, which captures digital footprints of students’ interactions with digital tools, along with survey responses from the Study of Learning Questionnaire (SLQ), to comprehensively examine their preferred learning strategies. Additionally, the study explores the relationship between these strategies and students’ learning dispositions measured at the start of the course. An innovative aspect of this investigation lies in its emphasis on understanding how learning dispositions act as antecedents and potentially predict the utilization of specific learning strategies. The data is scrutinized to identify patterns and clusters of such patterns between students’ learning disposition and their preferred strategies. Data is gathered from two cohorts of students, comprising 2,400 first year students. This analytical approach aims to uncover predictive insights, offering potential indicators to predict and understand students’ learning strategy preferences, which holds value for teachers, educational scientists, and educational designers. Understanding students’ regulation of their own learning process holds promise to recognize students with less beneficial learning strategies and target interventions aimed to improve these. A crucial takeaway from our research underscores the significance of flexibility, which entails the ability to adjust preferred learning strategies according to the learning environment. While it is imperative to instruct our students in deep learning strategies and encourage autonomous regulation of learning, this should not come at the expense of acknowledging situations where surface strategies and controlled regulation may prove to be more effective.","PeriodicalId":508739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1382771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the ongoing discussion about how learning analytics can effectively support self-regulated student learning and which types of data are most suitable for this purpose, this empirical study aligns with the framework who advocated the inclusion of both behavioral trace data and survey data in learning analytics studies. By incorporating learning dispositions in our learning analytics modeling, this research aims to investigate and understand how students engage with learning tasks, tools, and materials in their academic endeavors. This is achieved by analyzing trace data, which captures digital footprints of students’ interactions with digital tools, along with survey responses from the Study of Learning Questionnaire (SLQ), to comprehensively examine their preferred learning strategies. Additionally, the study explores the relationship between these strategies and students’ learning dispositions measured at the start of the course. An innovative aspect of this investigation lies in its emphasis on understanding how learning dispositions act as antecedents and potentially predict the utilization of specific learning strategies. The data is scrutinized to identify patterns and clusters of such patterns between students’ learning disposition and their preferred strategies. Data is gathered from two cohorts of students, comprising 2,400 first year students. This analytical approach aims to uncover predictive insights, offering potential indicators to predict and understand students’ learning strategy preferences, which holds value for teachers, educational scientists, and educational designers. Understanding students’ regulation of their own learning process holds promise to recognize students with less beneficial learning strategies and target interventions aimed to improve these. A crucial takeaway from our research underscores the significance of flexibility, which entails the ability to adjust preferred learning strategies according to the learning environment. While it is imperative to instruct our students in deep learning strategies and encourage autonomous regulation of learning, this should not come at the expense of acknowledging situations where surface strategies and controlled regulation may prove to be more effective.
通过倾向性学习分析了解基于问题的学习中的自我调节策略
在关于学习分析如何有效支持学生自我调节学习以及哪类数据最适合这一目的的持续讨论中,本实证研究与主张在学习分析研究中同时纳入行为跟踪数据和调查数据的框架相一致。通过将学习处置纳入学习分析建模,本研究旨在调查和了解学生在学习过程中如何参与学习任务、工具和材料。为此,我们分析了学生与数字工具互动的数字足迹跟踪数据,以及学习研究问卷(SLQ)的调查反馈,以全面考察学生偏好的学习策略。此外,本研究还探讨了这些策略与学生在课程开始时的学习倾向之间的关系。这项调查的创新之处在于,它强调了解学习倾向如何作为前因,并潜在地预测特定学习策略的使用。通过对数据的仔细研究,可以发现学生的学习倾向与他们偏好的学习策略之间的模式和模式群。数据收集自两批学生,共 2400 名一年级学生。这种分析方法旨在发现预测性见解,为预测和了解学生的学习策略偏好提供潜在指标,这对教师、教育科学家和教育设计者都有价值。了解学生对自身学习过程的调控,有望识别出学习策略不太有利的学生,并有针对性地采取干预措施来改善这些策略。我们的研究得出的一个重要结论强调了灵活性的重要性,即根据学习环境调整首选学习策略的能力。虽然我们必须指导学生掌握深层次的学习策略,并鼓励他们自主调节学习,但这不应该以牺牲表面策略和控制调节可能被证明更有效的情况为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信